"a4": A technique to improve perception of contacts with under-actuated haptic devices in virtual reality

Proceedings - 1st Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems; World Haptics Conference, WHC 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 316-322

  Lecuyer, Anatole ^a   Burkhardt, Jean Marie ^b   Le Biller, Jildaz ^b   Congedo, Marco ^a  

^a CAMPUS DE BEAULIEU   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REMOTE CONTROL; VIRTUAL REALITY;

CONTACT NORMALS; EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION; FORCE FEEDBACK; HAPTIC DEVICES; HAPTIC EXPLORATIONS; UNDER-ACTUATION; VIRTUAL OBJECTS; VIRTUAL SCENES;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 33750093352     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WHC.2005.1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. P. Bach-Y Rita, J. G. Webster, W. J. Thompkins, and T. Crabb, "Sensory substitution for space gloves and for space robots", Workshop on Space Telerobotics, Vol. 2, pp. 51-57, 1987.
2. F. Barbagli and K. Salisbury, "The effects of sensor/actuator asymmetries in haptic interfaces", Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2003.
3. Haption Company. http://www.haption.com
4. K. Hinckley, R. F. Pausch, J. C. Goble, and N. F. Kassell, "A Survey of Design Issues in Spatial Input", ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 213-222, 1994.
5. M. Koutek and F. H. Post, "Spring-based manipulation tools for virtual environments", Symposium on Immersive Projection Technology and Virtual Environments, pp. 61-70, 2001.
6. A. Lécuyer, S. Coquillart, A. Kheddar, P. Richard and P. Coiffet, "Pseudo-Haptic Feedback: Can Isometric Input Devices Simulate Force Feedback?", IEEE International Conference on Virtual Reality, pp. 83-90, 2000.
7. A. Lécuyer, A. Kheddar, S. Coquillart, L. Graux, and P. Coiffet, "A Haptic Prototype for the Simulations of Aeronautics Mounting/Unmounting Operations", IEEE International Workshop on Robot-Human Interactive Communication, 2001.
8. M. J. Massimino and T. B. Sheridan, "Sensory Substitution for Force Feedback in Teleoperation", Presence, Vol. 2, Num. 4, pp. 344-352, 1994.
9. Reachin Technologies. http://www.reachin. se
10. P. Richard, G. Birebent, P. Coiffet, G. Burdea, D. Gomez, and N. Langrana, "Effect of Frame Rate and Force Feedback on Virtual Object Manipulation", Presence, Vol. 5, Num. 1, pp. 95-108, 1996.
11. SensAble Technologies. http://www.sensable.com
12. B. J. Unger, A. Nicolaidis, P. J. Berkelman, A. Thompson, S. J. Lederman, R. L. Klatzky, and R. L. Hollis, "Virtual Peg-in-Hole Performance Using a 6-DOF Magnetic Levitation Haptic Device: Comparison with Real Forces and with Visual Guidance Alone", Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pp. 263-270, 2002.
13. S. Wang and M. A. Srinivasan, "The role of torque in haptic perception of objet location in virtual environment", Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2003.
14. C. Zilles and J. K. Salisbury, "A Constraint-based God-Object Method for Haptic Display", IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1995.