Parachute approach to evidence based medicine: As obvious as ABC [1]

British Medical Journal

Volumn 333, Issue 7572, 2006, Pages 807-

  Reeves, Barnaby C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PENICILLIN G;

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HARM REDUCTION; NOTE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HARM REDUCTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 33750090361     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Potts M, Prata N, Walsh J, Grossman A. Parachute approach to evidence based medicine. BMJ 2006; 333:701-3. (30 September.)
2. Electronic responses. Parachute approach to evidence based medicine. http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/333/7570/701 (accessed 3 Oct 2006).
3. Atkins D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, et al, GRADE Working Group. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new system. BMC Health Serv Res 2005;5(1):25.
4. Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001;323:42-6.
5. Smith GD. Classics in epidemiology: should they get it right? Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:441-2.