Progress and challenge of artificial intelligence

Journal of Computer Science and Technology

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 810-822

  Shi, Zhong Zhi ^a   Zheng, Nan Ning ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b XI'AN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Agent computing; Artificial intelligence; Intelligence science; Machine learning; Semantic web; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION; WORLD WIDE WEB;

AGENT COMPUTING; INTELLIGENCE SCIENCE; SEMANTIC WEB; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 33750087506     PISSN: 10009000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11390-006-0810-5     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. McCarthy J. The future of AI-A manifesto. AI Magazine, 2005, 26(4): 39.
2. Zhongzhi Shi. Intelligence Science. Tsinghua University Press, 2006.
3. Kirsh D. Foundations of artificial intelligence: The big issues. Artificial Intelligence, 1991, 47(1-3): 3-30.
4. Minsky M L. The Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1986.
5. HSFP home page, http://www.hfsp.org/.
6. Marr D. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1982.
7. Chen L. Topological structure in visual perception. Science, 1982, 218: 699-700.
8. Lin Chen, Shaowu Zhang, Mandyam V Srinivasan. Global perception in small brains: Topological pattern recognition in honey bees. In Proc. the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 27, 2003, 100(11): 6884-6889.
9. Kuffler S W. Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1953, (16): 37-68.
10. Hubel D H, Wiesel T N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, London, 1962, (160): 106-154.
11. Britten K H. Attention is everywhere. Nature, 1996, 382: 497.
12. Qingyong Li, Jun Shi, Zhongzhi Shi. A model of attentionguided visual sparse coding. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Cognitive Informatics, California, USA, 2005, pp.120-125.
13. Selfridge O G. Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. In Proc. the Symp. Mechanisation of Thought Processes, Blake D V, Uttley A M (eds.), London: HM Stationery Office, 1959, pp.511-529.
14. Hobbs J R. Granularity. In Proc. IJCAI, Los Angeles, 1985, pp.432-435.
15. Ling Zhang, Bo Zhang. Fuzzy reasoning model under quotient space structure. Inf. Sci., 2005, 173(4): 353-364.
16. Jerry R Hobbs. Granularity. In Proc. the 9th Int. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, LA, CA, USA, 1985, pp.432-435.
17. Craig A Knoblock. Generating Abstraction Hierarchies: An Automated Approach to Reducing Search in Planning. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993.
18. Yiyu Yao. Granular computing: Basic issues and possible solutions. In Proc. the 5th Joint Conf. Information Sciences, 2000, pp.186-189.
19. Lotfi A Zadeh. Towards a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its centrality in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1997, 19: 111-127.
20. Witold Pedrycz (ed.). Granular Computing: An Emerging Paradigm. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag, 2001.
21. Andrzej Bargiela, Witold Pedrycz. Granular Computing: An Introduction. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.
22. Zdzislaw Pawlak. Rough Sets Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991.
23. Yiyu Yao, Ning Zhong. Granular Computing Using Information Table. Data Miming, Rough Sets and Granular Computing, Lin T Y, Yao Y Y, Zadeh L A (eds.), Physica-Verlag, 2000, pp.102-124.
24. Zheng Z, Hu H, Shi Z Z. Tolerance granular space and its applications. IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, Beijing, China, 2005, pp.367-372.
25. Zheng Z, Hu H, Shi Z Z. Tolerance relation based information granular space. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, 3641: 682-691.
26. Zhongzhi Shi, Fen Lin, Qing Yu, Jiewen Luo. MAGE: Multiagent environment for humanized systems. In ISHS2005, Wuhan, China, 2005, pp.24-29.
27. FIPA. http://www.flpa.org/.
28. Ma Xiaoxing, Lv Jian, Tao Xianping et al. Mobile-agent-based approach to software coordition in the HO OPE system. Science in China (Series F), 2002, 45(3): 203-219.
29. Jiannong Cao, Xinyu Feng, Jian Lv, Sajal K. Das: Mailbox-based scheme for designing mobile agent communication protocols. IEEE Computer, 2002, 35(9): 54-60.
30. Zhongzhi Shi, Haijun Zhang, Yong Cheng et al. MAGE: An agent-oriented programming environment. IEEE ICCI, Victoria, Canada, 2004, pp.250-257.
31. T Berners-Lee, J Hendler, O Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific American, 2001, 284(5): 34-43.
32. http://www.w3.org/TR/daml+oil-reference.
33. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/.
34. Ian Horrocks. DAML+OIL: A description logic for the semantic web. Bull, the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Data Engineering, 2002, 25(1): 4-9.
35. Ian Horrocks, Peter F Patel-Schneider. Reducing OWL entailment to description logic satisfiability. In Proc. of the 2005 International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2005), Dieter Fensel, Katia Sycara, John Mylopoulos (eds.), Berlin: Springer, 2003, pp.17-29.
36. Franz Baader, Ian Horrocks, Ulrike Sattler. Description logics as ontology languages for the semantic web. In Festschrift in Honor of Jörg Siekmann, Dieter Hutter, Werner Stephan (eds.), Berlin: Springer, 2003.
37. McIlraith S, Son T C, Zeng H. Semantic web services. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on the Semantic Web, 2001, 16(2): 46-53.
38. Zhongzhi Shi, Mingkai Dong, Yuncheng Jiang, Haijun Zhang. A logic foundation for the semantic web. Science in China (Series F, Information Sciences), 2005, 48(2): 161-178.
39. Intelligence Science, http://www.intsci.ac.cn/.
40. Zhongzhi Shi. MSMiner: A platform for data mining. In Proc. 2002 Int. Conf. Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Beijing, China, Nov.4-5, 2002.
41. Katia Sycara, Seth Widoff, Matthias Klusch, Jianguo Lu. LARKS: Dynamic matchmaking among heterogenous software agents in Cyberspace. Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 2002, 5(2): 173-203.
42. Gerhard Jurgen Wickler. Using expressive and flexible action representations to reason about capabilities for intelligent agent cooperation [Dissertation], University of Edinburgh, 1999.
43. Khaled Arisha, Sarit Kraus, Fatma Ozean et al. IMPACT: The interactive Maryland platform for agents collaborating together. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 1999, 14(2): 64-72.
44. Nilsson N J. Human-level artificial intelligence? Be serious! AI Maganine, 2005, 26(4): 68-75.
45. Zhongzhi Shi, Sulan Zhang. Case-based introspective learning. ICCI2005, Irvine, CA, USA, pp.43-48.
46. Reber A S. Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 1967, 6: 855-863.
47. Richard F T, Kim J J. Memory system in the brain and localization of a memory. In Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, Nov. 1996, 93: 13438-13444.
48. Chomsky N. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
49. Mayeux R, Kandel E R. Disorders of Language: The Aphasias. Principles of Neural Science. 3rd Edition, Kandel E R, Schwarz J H, Jessell T M (eds.). Elsevier, 1991, pp.840-851.
50. Sun N Zheng, H Shum. Stereo matching using belief propagation. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 2003, 25: 787-800.
51. Greg Miller. What is the biological basis of consciousness? Science, July 1, 2005, 309(5731): 79.