A method for calculating the exact angle required during pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal deformity: Comparison with the trigonometric method

Neurosurgery

Volumn 59, Issue 4 SUPPL. 2, 2006, Pages

  Yang, Benson P ^a   Ondra, Stephen L ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Angle; Pedicle subtraction osteotomy; Sagittal balance; Trigonometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AXIS; CALCULATION; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; OSTEOTOMY; PEDICLE SUBTRACTION OSTEOTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; SACRAL SPINAL CORD; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; VALIDATION PROCESS; VERTEBRA MALFORMATION;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KYPHOSIS; LAMINECTOMY; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOTOMY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33750085877     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000232628.46247.15     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bridwell K, Lewis S, Edwards C, Lenke L, Iffrig T, Berra A, Baldus C, Blanke K: Complications and outcomes of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine 28:2093-2101, 2003.
2. Bridwell K, Lewis S, Lenke L, Baldus C, Blanke K: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:454-463, 2003.
3. Bridwell K, Lewis S, Rinella A, Lenke L, Baldus C, Blanke K: Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:44-49, 2004.
4. Domanic U, Talu U, Dikici F, Hamzaoglu A: Surgical correction of kyphosis. Posterior total wedge resection osteotomy in 32 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 75:449-455, 2004.
5. Glassman S, Berven S, Bridwell K, Horton W, Dimar J: Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine 30:682-688, 2005.
6. Horton W, Brown C, Bridwell K, Glassman S, Suk S, Cha C: Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36″ radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine 30:427-433, 2005.
7. Kim KT, Suk KS, Cho YJ, Hong GP, Park BJ: Clinical outcome results of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with kyphotic deformity. Spine 27:612-618, 2002.
8. Murrey D, Brigham C, Kiebzak G, Finger F, Chewning S: Transpedicular decompression and pedicle subtraction osteotomy (eggshell procedure). Spine 27:2338-2345, 2002.
9. Ondra S: Spinal deformity: The role of the neurosurgeon. Clin Neurosurg 50:228-238, 2002.
10. Ondra S, Salehi S, Koski T, Silva F: Trigonometric calculations of pedicle subtraction osteotomy size. Presented at the 11th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques, Southampton, Bermuda, July 1-3, 2004.
11. Rosner M, Ondra S: Surgical management of degenerative scoliosis. Semin Spine Surg 17:205-214, 2005.
12. Smith-Peterson M, Larson C, Aufranc O: Osteotomy of the spine for correction of flexion deformity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 27:1-11, 1945.
13. Thiranont N, Netrawichien P: Transpedicular decancellation closed wedge vertebral osteotomy for treatment of fixed flexion deformity of spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Spine 18:2517-2522, 1993.
14. Thomasen E: Vertebral osteotomy for correction of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 194:142-152, 1985.