The implications of including women's daily lives in a feminist GIScience

Transactions in GIS

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 751-761

  Gilbert, Melissa R ^a   Masucci, Michele ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE AGENTS; COLLABORATIVE WORK; COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS; DAILY LIVES; GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT; PHILADELPHIA;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION; FEMINISM; GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH; GIS; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; WOMENS STATUS;

NORTH AMERICA; PENNSYLVANIA; PHILADELPHIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33750083315     PISSN: 13611682     EISSN: 14679671     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01026.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bondi L and Rose D 2003 Constructing gender, constructing the urban: A review of Anglo-American feminist urban geography. Gender, Place and Culture 10: 229-45
2. Carver S 2003 The future of participatory approaches using geographic information: Developing a research agenda for the 21st century. URISA Journal 15 (APA 1): 61-71
3. Craig W J, Harris T M, and Weiner D (eds) Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems. London, Taylor and Francis
4. Drew C 2003 Transparency: Considerations for PPGIS research and development. URISA Journal (APA I) 15: 73-8
5. Ghose R and Elwood S 2003 Public participation GIS and local political context: Propositions and research directions. URISA Journal 15 (APA II): 17-24
6. Gilbert M 1993 Feminism and difference in urban geography. Urban Geography 18: 166-79
7. Gilbert M 2001 From the "Walk for Adequate Welfare" to the "3 for our Lives": Welfare rights organizing in the 1960s and 1970s. Urban Geography 22: 440-56
8. Gilbert M and Masucci M 2004 Feminist praxis in university community partnerships: Reflections on ethical crises and turning points in Temple-North Philadelphia IT partnerships. In Fuller D and Kitchin R (eds) Radical Theory/Critical Praxis: Making a Difference Beyond the Academy. Okanagan, Praxis (e) Press: 147-58
9. Gilbert M and Masucci M 2005a Research directions for information and communication technology and society in geography. Geoforum 36: 277-9
10. Gilbert M and Masucci M 2005b Moving beyond "gender and GIS" to a feminist perspective on information technologies: The impact of welfare reform on women's IT needs. In Nelson L and Seager J (eds) A Companion to Feminist Geography. Malden, Blackwell Publishing: 305-21
11. Hanson S 2002 Connections. Gender, Place and Culture 9: 301-3
12. Heath S 1986 Narrative space. In Rosen P (ed) Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology. New York, Columbia University Press: 379-420
13. Kwan M P 2002a Introduction: Feminist geography and GIS. Gender, Place and Culture 9: 261-2
14. Kwan M P 2002b Is GIS for women? Reflections on the critical discourse in the 1990s. Gender, Place and Culture 9: 271-9
15. Kwan M P 2002c Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92: 645-61
16. Kwan M P 2002d Time, information technologies and the geographies of everyday life. Urban Geography 23: 471-82
17. Massey D 1993 Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In Bird J, Curtis B, Putman T, Robertson G, and Tickner L (eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures Global Change. New York, Routledge: 59-69
18. Massey D 1994 Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press
19. McDowell L 1993 Space, place, and gender relations: Part II, Identity, difference, feminist geometries, and geographies. Progress in Human Geography 17: 305-18
20. McLafferty S 2002 Mapping women's worlds: Knowledge, power, and the bounds of GIS. Gender, Place and Culture 9: 263-9
21. Pavlovskaya M 2002 Mapping urban change and changing GIS: Other views of economic restructuring. Gender, Place and Culture 9: 281-9
22. Pickles J (ed) 1995 Ground Truth: The Social Implications of Geographic Information Systems. New York, Guilford Press
23. Preston V and Ustundag E 2005 Feminist geographies of the "city": Multiple voices, multiple meanings. In Nelson L and Seager J (eds) A Companion to Feminist Geography. Malden, Blackwell Publishing: 211-27
24. Schroeder P 1997a A public participation approach to charting information spaces. In Proceedings of AutoCarto 13, Seattle, Washington: 244-53
25. Schroeder P 1997b GIS in public participation settings. Unpublished Paper Presented at 1997 UCGIS Summer Assembly, Bar Harbor, Maine
26. Schroeder P 1999 Changing expectations of inclusion: Toward community self-discovery. URISA Journal 11: 43-51
27. Schuurman and Pratt G 2002. Care of the subject: Feminism and critiques of GIS. Gender, Place and Culture 9: 291-9
28. Seiber R E 2003 Public participation geographic information systems across borders. Canadian Geographer 47: 50-61
29. United Nations 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. WWW document, http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html