The visual politics of animals in bioscience - Earmice in the public sphere

Xenotransplantation

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 501-505

  Brown, Nik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Earmouse; Public Understanding of Science; Visual politics

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOLOGY; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; ORGANIZATION; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION; SOCIOLOGY; UNITED KINGDOM; XENOTRANSPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MICE; POLICY MAKING; TRANSPLANTATION, HETEROLOGOUS;

EID: 33750082321     PISSN: 0908665X     EISSN: 13993089     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2006.00352_2.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Franklin S. Drawing the line at not fully human. Am J Bioethics 2003; 3: 25-27.
2. Brown N, Webster A. New Medical Technologies and Society: Reordering Life. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004.
3. MacNaghten P. Animals in their nature: a case study of public attitudes on animals genetic modification and 'nature'. Sociology 2004; 38: 533-551.
4. Franklin A. Animals and Modern Cultures: A Sociology of Human-Animal Relations in Modernity. London: Sage, 1999.
5. Lundin S. The boundless body: cultural perspectives on xenotransplantation. Ethnos 1999; 64: 5-31.
6. Douglas M. Purity and Danger. An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge, 1994 (1966).
7. Brown N. Xenotransplantation: normalising disgust. Sci Cult 1999; 8: 327-355.
8. Irwin A, Wynne B (eds). Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
9. Wellcome Trust, Medicine and Society Programme. Public Perspectives on Human Cloning. London: The Wellcome Trust, 1998.
10. Brown N, Michael M. Switching between science and culture in transpecies transplantation. Sci Technol Human Values 2001; 26: 3-22.