Feasibility and validity of International Classification of Diseases based case mix indices

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 6, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Yang, Che Ming ^a   Reinke, William ^b  

^a TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE MIX; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP; EMERGENCY CARE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH INSURANCE; HOSPITAL CARE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; LENGTH OF STAY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICARE; REIMBURSEMENT; TAIWAN; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; CLASSIFICATION; HOSPITALIZATION; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY;

DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MEDICARE; RESEARCH DESIGN; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TAIWAN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33750080184     PISSN: 14726963     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-125     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Young WW, Swinkola RB, Zorn DM: The measurement of hospital case mix. Med Care 1982, 20:501-512.
2. Richardson D, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Lee SK: Risk adjustment for quality improvement. Pediatrics 1999, 103:255-265.
3. Lichtig LK: Hospital Information System for Case Mix Management New York: John Wiley & Sons Press; 1986.
4. Salkever DS, Steinwachs DM: Utilization and case-mix impacts of per case payment in Maryland. Health Care Financ Rev 1988, 9:23-32.
5. Rosko MD, Chilingerian JA: Estimating hospital inefficiency: does case mix matter? J Med Syst 1999, 23:57-71.
6. Smits HL, Fetter RB, McMahon LF: Variation in resource use within diagnosis-related groups: the severity Issue. Health Care Financ Rev 1984:71-78.
7. Rogowski JR, Byrne DJ: Comparison of alternative weight recalibration methods for diagnosis-related groups. Health Care Financ Rev 1990, 12:87.
8. Bureau of National Health Insurance: Notice National Health Insurance Review NO. 0910023203 Taiwan: Executive Yuan Department of Health; 2002.
9. Department of Health: Medical Care Act Taiwan: Executive Yuan; 1986.
10. Lewis-Beck MS: Applied Regression: An Introduction California: Sage Press; 1980.
11. Rutledge R, Osler T: The ICD-9-based illness severity score: A new model that outperforms both DRG and APR-DRG as predictors of survival and resource utilization. J Trauma 1998, 45:791-799.
12. Shen Y: Applying the 3 M All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups Grouper to measure inpatient severity in the VA. Med Care 2003, 41:II-103-II-110.
13. Quan H, Parsons GA, Ghali WA: Validity of information on comorbidity derived from ICD-9-CCM administrative data. Med Care 2002, 40:675-685.
14. Grace MC, Farley DO: A longitudinal comparison of charge-based weights with cost-based weights. Health Care Financ Rev 1992, 13:53-63.