Remediation of pesticide-polluted waters through membranes

Separation and Purification Reviews

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-38

  Bhattacharya, A ^a  

^a CSIR CENTRAL SALT AND MARINE CHEMICALS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Hydrophobicity; Membrane charge; Nanofiltration membrane; Pesticides; Pores; Stokes radius

Indexed keywords

HYDROPHOBICITY; NANOFILTRATION; OSMOSIS MEMBRANES; PESTICIDES; REMEDIATION; WATER POLLUTION CONTROL;

MEMBRANE CHARGE; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; STOKES RADIUS;

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT);

EID: 33750078717     PISSN: 15422119     EISSN: 15422127     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15422110500536151     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Gohil, J.M., Ray, P., and Bhattacharya, A. (2005) Pesticides in water-alarm and encountering. Science and Culture, 71 (9-10): 348-350.
2. Available on world wide web (http://www.epa.gov/safewater/mcl.html). List of Contaminants and their Maximum Contaminant Level (MCLs).
3. Available on world wide web (http://ianpubs.unl.edu/water/g1489.htm). Drinking Water Treatment: Activated Carbon Filtration.
4. Martin-Gullon, I. and Font, R. (2001) Dynamic pesticide removal with activated carbon fibers. Water Res., 35 (2): 516-522.
5. Heijman, S.G.J. and Hopman, R. (1990) Activated carbon filtration in drinking water production: Model prediction and new concepts. Colloids and Surf A: Phys. and Eng. Aspects, 151 (1-2): 303-310.
6. LaGrega, M., Buckingham, P., and Evans (1994) J. Hazardous Waste Management; McGraw-Hill Inc.: New York.
7. Matsuura, T. (1994) Synthetic Membranes and Membrane Separation Processes; CRC Press Inc.: Boca Raton, FL.
8. Bhattacharya, A. and Misra, B.N. (2004) Grafting: A versatile means of polymer modification techniques, factors and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci., 29 (8): 767-814.
9. Bhattacharya, A. and Ghosh, P. (2004) Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane: Theory and application in separation of electrolytes. Review in Chem. Eng., 20 (1-2): 111-180.
10. Vander Bruggen, B. and Vandecasteele, C. (2003) Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. Em. Poll., 122: 435-445.
11. The New Encyclopedia Britannica. (1998) 15th edition. Vol. 2. Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.
12. O'Brien & Gere Engineers, Inc. (1995) Innovative Engineering Technologies for Hazardous Waste Remediation; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York.
13. Available on world wide web (http://www.frtr.gov/matrix2/section4/456. html). Ultraviolet (UV) Oxidation.
14. Kiso, Y., Nishimura, Y., Kitao, T., and Nishimura, K. (2000) Rejection properties of non-phenylic pesticides with nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 171: 229-237.
15. Vander Bruggen, B., Schaep, J., Maes, W., Wilms, D., and Vandecasteele, C. (1998) Nanofiltration as a treatment method for the removal of pesticides from groundwaters. Desalination, 117: 139-147.
16. Boussahel, R., Bouland, S., Moussaoui, K.M., and Montiel, A. (2000) Removal of pesticide residues in water using the nanofiltration process. Desalination, 132: 205-209.
17. Kamide, K. and Iijima, H. (1994) Recent advances in cellulose membranes. In Polymers, Blends and Composites; Gilbert, R.D. (ed.), Carl Hanser Verlag: Munich, 189-207.
18. Ho, C.C. and Zydney, A.L. (2000) Measurement of membrane pore interconnectivity. J. Membr. Sci., 170: 101-112.
19. Masselin, I., Chasseray, X., Chevalier, M.-R., Laine, J.-M., and Lemordant, D. (2000) Determination of the porosity to thickness ratio Ak/Ax for UF and MF membranes by diffusion experiments. J. Membr. Sci., 172: 125-133.
20. Serrano, D.A. and Wio, H.S. (2002) Separation factor of membranes used for isotopic separation by gaseous diffusion: Pore morphology influence and effect of cracks. J. Membr. Sci., 204: 5-25.
21. Fritzsche, A.K., Arevalo, A.R., Connolly, A.F., Moore, M.D., Elings, V., and Wu, C.M. (1992) The structure and morphology of the skin polyethersulfone ultra-filtration membranes: A comparative atomic force microscope and scanning electron microscope study. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 45: 1945-1950.
22. Matsuura, T. (2001) Progress in membrane science and technology for seawater desalination-a review. Desalination, 134: 47-54.
23. Bowen, W.R. and Doneva, T.A. (2000) Atomic force microscopy studies of nano-filtration membranes: Surface morphology, pore size distribution and adhesion. Desalination, 129 (2): 163-172.
24. Matsuura, T. and Sourirajan, S. (1981) Reverse osmosis transport through capillary pores under the influence of surface forces. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 20: 273-282.
25. Kastelan-Kunst, L., Dananic, V., Kunst, B., and Kosutie, K. (1996) Preparation and porosity of Cellulose triacetate reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 109: 223-230.
26. Kosutie, K., Kastelam-Kunst, L., and Kunst, B. (2000) Porosity of some commercial reverse osmosis and nanofiltration polyamide thin-film composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 168: 101-108.
27. Peterson, R.J. (1993) Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 83:81-150.
28. Bellona, C., Drewes, J.F., Xu, P., and Amy, G. (2004) Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment - A literature review. Water Res., 38: 2795-2809.
29. Kiso, Y., Kitao, T., Kiyokatsu, J., and Miyagi, M. (1992) The effects of molecular width on permeation of organic solute through cellulose acetate reverse osmosis membrane. J. Membr. Sci., 74 (1-2): 95-103.
30. Kiso, Y., Ton, K., Kitao, T., and Nishimura, K. (2001) Rejection properties of alkyl phthalates with nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 182: 205-214.
31. Hyperchem. (1994) Release 3 for Windows, Molecular Modeling System; Hyperchem Inc. and Autodesk, Inc.: Waterloo, Ontario.
32. Taylor, J.S., Chen, S.-S., Mulford, L.A., and Norris, C.D. (2000) Flat sheet, bench and pilot testing for pesticide removal using reverse osmosis. AWWA Research Foundation Report: Denver, Co.
33. Van Derbruggen, B. and Vandecasteele, C. (2002) Modelling of the retention of uncharged molecules with nanofiltration. Water Res., 36: 1360-1368.
34. Kiso, Y., Mizuno, A., Othman, R.A.A., Jung, Y.J., Kumano, A., and Ariji, A. (2002) Rejection properties of pesticides with a hollow fiber NF membrane (HNF-1). Desalination, 143: 147-157.
35. Kiso, Y., Sugiura, Y., Kitao, T., and Nishimura, K. (2001) Effects of hydrophobicity and molecular size on rejection of aromatic pesticides with nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 192: 1-10.
36. Kiso, Y. (2001) Factors affecting adsorption of organic solutes on cellulose in an aqueous system. Chromatography, 22 (1): 55-58.
37. Kiso, Y. (1986) Factors affecting adsorption of organic compounds on cellulose acetate in an aqueous solution system. Chromatographia, 22: 55-60.
38. Kosutic, K. and Kunst, B. (2002) Removal of organics from aqueous solutions by commercial RO and NF membranes of characterized porosities. Desalination, 142: 47-56.
39. Schaep, J., Vander Bruggen, B., Van Decasteele, C., and Wilms, D. (1998) Influence of ion size and charge in a nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Tech., 14: 155-162.
40. Sourirajan, S. and Matsura, T. (1985) Reverse Osmosis/Ultrafiltration Process Principles; National Research Council Canada: Ottawa, Chapters 1, 2, 5.
41. Vander Bruggen, B., Schaep, J., Wilms, D., and Vandecasteele, C. (1999) Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci., 156: 29-41.
42. Vander Bruggen, B., Everaert, K., Wilms, D., and Vandecasteele, C. (2001) Application of nanofiltration for removal of pesticides, nitrate and hardness from ground water: Rejection properties and economic evaluation. J. Membr. Sci., 193: 239-248.
43. Zhang, Y., Vander Bruggen, B., Chen, G.X., Braeken, L., and Vandecasteele, C. (2004) Removal of pesticides by nanofiltraion: Effect of the water matrix. Sep. Purif. Tech., 38 (2): 163-172.
44. Berg, P., Hagmeyer, G., and Gimbel, R. (1997) Removal of pesticides and other micropollutants by nanofiltration. Desalination, 113: 205-208.
45. Thanuttamavong, M., Yamammuto, K., Oh, J.L., and Choo, K.H. (2002) Rejection characteristics of organic and inorganic pollutants by ultralow-pressure nanofiltration of surface water for drinking water treatment. Desalination, 145: 257-264.
46. Boussahel, R., Montiel, A., and Baudu, M. (2002) Effects of organic and inorganic matter on pesticide rejection by nanofiltration. Desalination, 145: 109-114.
47. Hofman, J.A.M., Noij, T.N.M., and Schrippers, J.C. (1993) Removal of pesticides and other organic micropollutants with membrane filtration. Water Supply, 11: 101-111.
48. Yoon, S.H., Lee, C.H., Kim, K.J., and Fand, A.G. (1998) Effect of calcium ion on the fouling of nanofilter by humic acid in drinking water production. Water Res., 32 (7): 2180-2186.
49. Devitt, E.C., Ducellier, F., Cote, P., and Wiesner, M.R. (1998) Effects of natural organic matter and the raw water matrix on the rejection of atrazine by pressure driven membranes. Water Res., 32 (9): 2563-2568.
50. Rajalakshmi, N., Sivarajan, S.R., and Vold, R.D. (1959) The viscosity of sodium humate solutions from coal. J. Colloid Sci., 14: 419-429.
51. Ghosh, K. and Schnitzer, M. (1980) Macromolecular structures of humic substances. Soil Sci., 129: 266-276.
52. Wang, Y., Combe, C., and Clark, M.M. (2001) The effects of pH and calcium on the diffusion coefficient of humic acid. J. Membr. Sci., 183: 49-60.
53. Majeswska-Nowak, K. and Winnicki, T. (1999) Analysis of membrane fouling in the treatment water solutions containing humic acids and mineral salts. Desalination, 126: 179-185.
54. Hong, S. and Elimlech, M. (1997) Chemical and physical aspects of natural matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci., 132: 159-181.
55. Manttari, M., Puro, L., Jokinen, J.N., and Nystrom, M. (2000) Fouling effects of polysaccharides and humic acid in nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci., 165: 1-17.
56. Elimlech, M., Chen, W.H., and Wayapa, J.J. (1994) Measuring the zeta (electro-kinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer. Desalination, 95: 269-286.
57. Jordan, D.O. and Taylor, A.J. (1952) Electrophoretic mobilities of hydrocarbon droplets in water and dilute solution of EtOH. Trans. Faraday Soc., 48: 346-351.
58. Voegtli, L.P. and Zukoski, C.F. (1991) Adsortion of ionic species to the surfaces of polystyrene latexes. J. Coll. Inter. Sci., 141: 92-96.
59. Elimelech, M. and O'Melia, C.R. (1990) Effect of particle size on collision efficiency in the deposition of Brownian particles with electrostatic energy barriers. Coll. Surf., 44: 165-170.
60. Shaw, D.J. (1969) Electrophoresis; Academic Press: London.
61. Westall, J. and Hohl, H.A. (1980) Comparison of electrostatic models for the oxide solution interfaces. Adv. Coll. Inter. Sci., 12: 265-294.
62. Elimlech, M. and O'Melia, C.R. (1990) Effect of electrolyte type on the electrophoretic mobility of Polystyrene latex colloids. Coll. Surf., 44: 165-178.
63. Fievet, P., Sbai, M., Szymezyk, A., and Vidonne, A. (2003) Determining the ζ-potential of plane membranes from tangential streaming potential measurements: Effect of membrane body conductance. J. Membr. Sci., 226: 227-236.
64. Mockel, D., Staude, E., Cin, M.D., Darcovich, K., and Quiver, M. (1998) Tangential flow streaming potential measurements: Hydrodynamic cell characterization and zeta potentials of caroxylated polysulfone membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 145: 211-222.
65. Childress, A.E. and Elimlech, M. (1996) Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 119: 253-268.
66. Chen, S.S., Taylor, J.S., Mulford, L.A., and Norris, C.D. (2004) Influences of molecular weight, molecular size, flux and recovery for aromatic pesticide removal by nanofiltration membranes. Desalination, 160: 103-111.
67. Vander Bruggen, B., Geens, J., and Vandecasteele, C. (2002) Influence of organic solvents on the performance of polymeric nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol., 37 (4): 783-797.
68. Machado, D.R., Hasson, D., and Semiat, R. (1999) Effect of solvent properties on permeate flow through nanofiltration membranes. Part I. Investigation of parameters affecting solvent flux. J. Membr. Sci., 163: 93-102.
69. Yang, X.J., Livingston, A.G., and Freitas dos Santos, L. (2001) Experimental observations of nanofiltration with organic solvents. J. Membr. Sci., 190: 45-55.
70. Geens, J., Vander Bruggen, B., and Vandecasteele, C. (2004) Characterisation of the solvent stability of polymeric nanofiltration membranes by measurement of contact angles and swelling. Chem. Eng. Sci., 59 (5): 1161-1164.
71. Tarleton, E.S., Robinson, J.P., Millington, C.R., and Nijmeije, A. (2005) Non-aqueous nanofiltration: Solute rejection in low polarity binary systems. J. Membr. Sci., 252: 123-131.
72. Mulder, M. (1997) Basic Principles of Membrane Technology, 2nd ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
73. Bhanushali, D., Kloos, S., Kurth, C., and Bhattacharyya, D. (2001) Performance of solvent-resistant membranes for non-aqueous systems: Solvent permeation results and modeling. J. Membr. Sci., 189: 1-21.
74. Geens, J., Peeters, K., Vander Bruggen, B., and Vandecasteele, C. (2005) Polymeric nanofiltration of binary water-alcohol mixtures: Influence of feed composition and membrane properties on permeability and rejection. J. Membr. Sci., 255: 255-264.
75. White, L.S. (2002) Transport properties of a polyimide solvent resistant nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci., 205: 191-202.
76. Vander Bruggen, B., Geens, J., and Vandecasteele, C. (2002) Fluxes and rejections for nanofiltration with solvent stable polymeric membranes in water, ethanol and n-hexane. Chem. Eng. Sci., 57: 2511-2518.
77. Bonne, P.A.C., Beerendonk, E.F., Vander Hoek, J.P., and Hofman, J.A.M.H. (2000) Retention of herbicides and pesticides in relation to aging of RO membranes. Desalination, 132: 189-193.
78. Futselaar, H., Schonewille, H., and Vander Meer, W. (2002) Direct capillary nano-filtration - A new high grade purification concept. Desalination, 145: 75-80.