Fine needle aspiration of the vocal fold lamina propria in an animal model

Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

Volumn 115, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 764-768

  Cobell, Will ^a   Duflo, Suzy M ^a   Magrufov, Akhmar ^a   Thibeault, Susan L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanical properties; Collagen; Elastin; Fine needle aspiration; Scar; Vocal fold

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN; ELASTIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOLOGY; FLOW KINETICS; HISTOLOGY; LAMINA PROPRIA; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; SHEAR STRESS; VISCOELASTICITY; VISCOUS MODULUS; VOCAL CORD; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 33750074446     PISSN: 00034894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000348940611501009     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Behrman A, Sulica L, He T. Factors predicting patient perception of dysphonia caused by benign vocal fold lesions. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1693-700.
2. Roy N, Weinrich B, Tanner K, Corbin-Lewis K, Stemple J. Replication, randomization, and clinical relevance: a response to Dworkin and colleagues. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004;47:358-65.
3. Courey MS, Garrett CG, Ossoff RH. Medial microflap for excision of benign vocal fold lesions. Laryngoscope 1997;107:340-4.
4. Oertel YC, Zorsky PE. Fine needle aspiration as a means to cost-effective health care. South Med J 1993;86:282-4.
5. Orell SR. Fine needle aspiration biopsy in perspective. Pathology 1982;14:113-4.
6. Bottles K, Miller TR, Cohen MB, Ljung BM. Fine needle aspiration biopsy. Has its time come? Am J Med 1986;81:525-31.
7. Amedee RG, Dhurandhar NR. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1551-7.
8. Cannon CR, Replogle WH. Fine-needle aspiration: survey of clinical utility. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:563-5.
9. Frable WJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a review. Hum Pathol 1983;14:9-28.
10. Vargas HI, Masood S. Implementation of a minimally invasive breast biopsy program in countries with limited resources. Breast J 2003;9(suppl 2):S81-S85.
11. Kaminsky DB. Aspiration biopsy in the context of the new Medicare fiscal policy. Acta Cytol 1984;28:333-6.
12. Rimm DL, Stastny JF, Rimm EB, Ayer S, Frable WJ. Comparison of the costs of fine-needle aspiration and open surgical biopsy as methods for obtaining a pathologic diagnosis. Cancer 1997;81:51-6.
13. Layfield LJ, Chrischilles EA, Cohen MB, Bottles K. The palpable breast nodule. A cost-effectiveness analysis of alternate diagnostic approaches. Cancer 1993;72:1642-51.
14. Thibeault SL, Gray SD, Bless DM, Chan RW, Ford CN. Histologic and rheologic characterization of vocal fold scarring. J Voice 2002;16:96-104.
15. Klemuk SA, Titze IR. Viscoelastic properties of three vocal-fold injectable biomaterials at low audio frequencies. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1597-603.
16. Rousseau B, Hirano S, Chan RW, et al. Characterization of chronic vocal fold scarring in a rabbit model. J Voice 2004;18:116-24.
17. Hansen JK, Thibeault SL, Walsh JF, Shu XZ, Prestwich GD. In vivo engineering of the vocal fold extracellular matrix with injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogels: early effects on tissue repair and biomechanics in a rabbit model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2005;114:662-70.
18. Duflo S, Thibeault S, Li W, Shu XZ, Prestwich G. Effect of a synthetic extracellular matrix on vocal fold lamina propria gene expression on early wound healing. Tissue Eng (in press).