Comparing electronic-keypad responses to paper-and-pencil questionnaires in group assessments of alcohol consumption and related attitudes

Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 31, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2334-2338

  LaBrie, Joseph ^a   Earleywine, Mitch ^b   Lamb, Toby ^a   Shelesky, Kristin ^a  

^a LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol consumption; Assesstment; College students; Handheld keypads; Self report questionnaires; Social norms

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; ELECTRONICS; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF-ASSESSMENT;

EID: 33750068863     PISSN: 03064603     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Baer J.S., Stacy A., and Larimer M.E. Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 52 (1991) 580-586
2. Del Boca F.K., and Darkes J. The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: State of the science and challenges for research. Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and Other Drugs 98 Suppl. 2 (2003) 1-12
3. Dimeff L., Baer J., Kvilahan D., and Marlatt A.G. Brief alcohol screening and intervention for college students: A harm reduction approach (BASICS) (1999), Guilford, NY
4. Korcuska J.S., and Thombs D.L. Gender role conflicts and sex-specific drinking norms: Relationships to alcohol use in undergraduate women and men. Journal of College Student Development 44 2 (2003) 204-215
5. LaBrie J., Pedersen E.R., and Earleywine M. A group-administered timeline followback assessment of alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 66 (2005) 693-697
6. Martin G. OPTIONS: Target, systems update (1995), Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto
7. Miller E.T., Neal D.J., Roberts L.J., Baer J.S., Cressler S.O., Metrik J., et al. Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: Is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods?. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 16 1 (2002) 56-63
8. Perkins, H. W., & Craig, D. W. (2004). The Social Norms Surveys Online. Accessible at http://alcohol.hws.edu
9. Raghunathan T.E., Rosenthal R., and Rubin D.B. Comparing correlated but non-overlapping correlations. Psychological Methods 1 2 (1996) 178-183
10. Rimal R.N., and Real K. Understanding the influence of perceived norms on behaviors. Communication Theory 13 2 (2003) 184-203
11. Sobell L.C., Brown J., Leo G.I., and Sobell M.B. The reliability of the alcohol timeline followback when administered by telephone and by computer. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 42 (1996) 49-54