Recent studies improve understanding of population dynamics across species ranges

Oikos

Volumn 115, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 386-388

  Sagarin, Raphael D ^a   Gaines, Steven D ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750063167     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14438.x     Document Type: Note

References (25)

1. Brewer, A. M. and Gaston, K. J. 2002. The geographical range structure of the holly leaf-miner. I. Population density. - J. Anim. Ecol. 71: 99-111.
2. Brown, J. H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. - Am. Nat. 124: 255-279.
3. Brown, J. H., Stevens, G. C. and Kaufman, D. M. 1996. The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 597-623.
4. Curnutt, J. L., Pimm, S. L. and Maurer, B. A. 1996. Population variability of sparrows in space and time. - Oikos 76: 131-144.
5. Gaston, K. J. 2003. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. - Oxford Univ. Press.
6. Gaylord, B. and Gaines, S. D. 2000. Temperature or transport? Range limits in marine species mediated solely by flow. - Am. Nat. 155: 769-789.
7. Grant, M. C. and Antonovics, J. 1978. Biology of ecologically marginal populations of Anthoxanthum odoratum. I. Phenetics and dynamics. - Evolution 32: 822-838.
8. Guo, Q., Taper, M., Schoenberger, M. and Brandle, J. 2005. Spatial-temporal population dynamics across species range: from centre to margin. - Oikos 108: 47-57.
9. Hampe, A. and Petit, R. J. 2005. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters. - Ecol. Lett. 8: 461-467.
10. Hengeveld, R. and Haeck, J. 1982. The distribution of abundance. I. Measurements. - J. Biogeogr. 9: 303-316.
11. Herlihy, C. R. and Eckert, C. G. 2005. Evolution of self-fertilization at geographical range margins? A comparison of demographic, floral, and mating system variables in central vs peripheral populations of Aquilegia canadensis (Ranunculaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 92: 744-751.
12. Klok, C. J., Chown, S. L. and Gaston, K. J. 2003. The geographical range structure of the Holly leaf-miner. III. Cold hardiness physiology. - Funct. Ecol. 17: 858-868.
13. Kluth, C. and Bruelheide, H. 2005. Central and peripheral Hornungia petraea populations: patterns and dynamics. - J. Ecol. 93: 584-595.
14. Lawton, J. H. 1993. Range, population abundance and conservation. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 409-413.
15. Lesica, P. and Allendorf, F. W. 1995. When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? - Conserv. Biol. 9: 753-760.
16. McGeoch, M. A. and Price, P. W. 2004. Spatial abundance structures in an assemblage of gall-forming sawflies. - J. Anim. Ecol. 73: 506-516.
17. Nathan, R., Safriel, U. N. and Shirihai, H. 1996. Extinction and vulnerability to extinction at distribution peripheries: an analysis of the Israeli breeding avifauna. - Isr. J. Zool. 42: 361-383.
18. Parmesan, C., Ryrholm, N., Stefanescu, C. et al. 1999. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. - Nature 399: 579-583.
19. Safriel, U. N., Volis, S. and Kark, S. 1994. Core and peripheral populations and global climate change. - Isr. J. Plant Sci. 42: 331-345.
20. Sagarin, R. and Gaines, S. 2002a. The'abundant centre' distribution: to what extent is it a biogeographic rule? - Ecol. Lett. 5: 137-147.
21. Sagarin, R. and Gaines, S. 2002b. Geographical abundance distributions of coastal invertebrates: using 1-dimensional ranges to test biogeographic hypotheses. - J. Biogeogr. 29: 985-998.
22. Soule, M. 1973. The epistasis cycle: a theory of marginal populations. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4: 165-187.
23. Stevens, R. D., Willig, M. R. and Gamarra de Fox, I. 2004. Comparative community ecology of bats from eastern Paraguay: taxonomic, ecological, and biogeographic perspectives. - J. Mammal. 85: 698-707.
24. Vucetich, J. A. and Waite, T. A. 2003. Spatial patterns of demography and genetic processes across the species' range: null hypotheses for landscape conservation genetics. - Conserv. Genet. 4: 639-645.
25. Williams, C. K., Ives, A. R. and Applegate, R. D. 2003. Population dynamics across geographical ranges: time-series analyses of three small game species. - Ecology 84: 2654-2667.