![]() |
Volumn 72, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 6860-6861
|
Possible errors in the interpretation of ethidium bromide and picogreen DNA staining results from ethidium monoazide-treated DNA [2]
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AGAROSE;
AZIDE;
BACTERIAL DNA;
CHEMICAL AGENT;
ETHIDIUM;
ETHIDIUM AZIDE;
ETHIDIUM BROMIDE;
INTERCALATING AGENT;
UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;
AGAR GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;
ARTIFACT;
BACTERIAL CELL;
CELL VIABILITY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DNA BINDING;
DNA DETERMINATION;
DNA EXTRACTION;
DNA HELIX;
DNA ISOLATION;
ESCHERICHIA COLI;
FLUORESCENCE;
LETTER;
LIGHT EXPOSURE;
NONHUMAN;
POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;
REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;
SALMONELLA ENTERICA;
SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;
STAINING;
ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;
AZIDES;
BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
DNA;
ETHIDIUM;
ORGANIC CHEMICALS;
STAINING AND LABELING;
|
EID: 33750061026
PISSN: 00992240
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01243-06 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (16)
|
References (6)
|