On ontology alignment experiments

Webology

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2006, Pages

  Abolhassani, Hassan ^a   Hariri, Babak Bagheri ^a   Haeri, Seyed H ^a  

^a SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Compound measure; Lexical measure; Ontology alignment; Sensitivity analysis; Structural measure

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750057655     PISSN: 1735188X     EISSN: 1735188X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bach, L., Dieng-Kuntz; R., & Gandon, F. (2004). On ontology matching problems (for building a corporate semantic web in a multi-communities organization). In: Proceedings of the oICEIS, 2004, 2004.
2. Barthlemy, J.-P., & Gunoche, A. (1992). Trees and Proximity Representations. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons, 1992.
3. Bouquet, P., Ehrig, M., Euzenat, J., Franconi, E., Hitzler, P., et al. (2005). Specification of a Common Framework for Characterizing Alignment. Knowledge Web, Statistical Research Division, Room 3000-4, Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC, 20233-9100 USA, Tech. Rep. deliverable 2.2.1, February 2005.
4. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., & Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Belmont: Wadsworth, 1984.
5. Dieng, R., & Hug, S. (1998). Comparison of personal ontologies represented through conceptual graphs. In: Proceedings of the 13th ECAI Conference, 1998, pp. 341-345.
6. Doan, A., Domingos, P., & Halevy, A. (2003). Learning to match the schemas of data sources: A multistrategy approach. Machine Learning, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 279-301, 2003.
7. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., & Halevy, A. (2003). Learning to map ontologies on the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), 2003, pp. 662-673.
8. Ehrig, M., Staab, S., & Sure, Y. (2005). Bootstrapping ontology alignment methods with APFEL. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-2005). ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Y. Gil, E. Motta, and R. Benjamins, Eds., 2005, pp. 186-200.
9. Ehrig, M., & Sure, Y. (2004). Ontology mapping - an integrated approach. In: Proceedings of the European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS), May 2004, pp. 76-91.
10. Euzenat, J., Barrasa, J., Bouquet, P., Bo, J.D., et al. (2004). State of the Art on Ontology Alignment. Knowledge Web, Statistical Research Division, Room 3000-4, Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC, 20233-9100 USA, deliverable 2.2.3, 2004.
11. Euzenat,, J., & Valtchev, P. (2003). An integrative proximity measure for ontology alignment. In: Proceedings of Semantic Integration workshop at ISWC, 2003.
12. Euzenat, J., & Valtchev, P. (2004). Similarity-based ontology alignment in owllite. In: Proceedings of ECAI, 2004, pp. 333-337.
13. Jaro, M. (1995). Probabilistic Linkage of Large Public Health Data Files. Molecular Biology, Vol. 14, pp. 491-498.
14. Kalfoglou, Y., & Hu, B. (2005). Crosi mapping system (cms) results of the 2005 ontology alignment contest. In: Proceedings of K-Cap'05 Integrating Ontologies workshop, 2005, pp. 77-85.
15. Larose, D.T. (2005). Discovering Knowledge in Data. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley and Sons, 2005.
16. Levenshtein, V. (1966). Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions and Reversals. Soviet Physics-Doklady, Vol. 10, pp. 707-710, August 1966.
17. Madhavan, J., Bernstein, P., & Rahm, E. (2001). Schema matching using cupid. In: Proceedings of the 27th VLDB Conference, 2001, pp. 48-58.
18. Maedche, A., & Zacharias, V. (2002). Clustering ontologybased metadata in the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the 13th ECML and 6th PKDD, 2002.
19. Monge, A.E., & Elkan, C.P. (1996). The Field-Matching Problem: Algorithm and Applications. In: Proceedings of the second international Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1996.
20. Needleman, S., & Wunsch, C. (1970). A General Method Applicable to the Search for Similarities in the Amino Acid Sequence of two Proteins. Molecular Biology, Vol. 48, 1970.
21. Noy, N., & Musen, M. (2001). Anchor-prompt: using non-local context for semantic matching. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2001, pp. 63-70.
22. Ross, S. (1976). A First Course in Probability. Macmillan, 1976.
23. Smith, T., & Waterman, M. (1981). Identification of Common Molecular Subsequences. Molecular Biology, 147(1), 195-197.
24. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G., & Kollias, S. (2005). A String Metric for Ontology Alignment. In: Proceedings of the ninth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, October 2005, pp. 624-237.
25. Sure, Y., Corcho, O., Euzenat, J., & Hughes, T. (2004). Eds. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Evaluation of Ontology-based tools (EON), 2004.
26. Valtchev, P. (1999). Construction automatique de taxonomies pour laide la reprsentation de connaissances par objets. Ph.D. Dissertation, Universite Grenoble.
27. Valtchev, P., & Euzenat, J. (1997). Eds., Dissimilarity measure for collections of objects and values, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. London, UK: Springer, 1997, vol. 1280.
28. Winkler, W.E. (1999). The State Record Linkage and Current Research Problems. U. S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Research Division, Room 3000-4, Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC, 20233-9100 USA, Tech. Rep., 1999.
29. Zhong, J., Zhu, H., Li, Y., & Yu, Y. (1995). Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), 1995.
30. Zhong, J., Zhu, H., Li, Y., & Yu, Y. (2002). Conceptual graph matching for semantic search. In: Proceedings of Conceptual Structures: Integration and Interfaces (ICCS-2002), 2002, pp. 92-106.