Test-retest reliability of willingness to pay

European Journal of Health Economics

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 176-181

  Shiell, Alan ^a,b   Hawe, Penelope ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c Markin Institute   (Canada)

Author keywords

Generalizability analysis; Test retest reliability; Values clarification; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; INTERVENTION STUDY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 33750048994     PISSN: 16187598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-006-0349-y     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arrow K, Solow R, Portney P et al. (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed Regist 58: 4601-4614
2. Bravo G, Potvin L (1991) Estimating the reliability of continuous measures with Cronbach's alpha or the intraclass correlation coefficient: toward the integration of two traditions. J Clin Epidemiol 44: 381-390
3. Cronbach LJ, Rajaratnam N, Gleser GC (1963) Theory of generalizability: a liberation of reliability theory. Br J Stat Psychol 16: 137-163
4. Diener A, O'Brien B, Gafni A (1998) Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature. Health Econ 7: 313-326
5. Donaldson C, Shackley P (1997) Does "process utility" exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Soc Sci Med 44: 699-707
6. EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16: 199-208
7. Gafni A (1991) Willingness-to-pay as a measure of benefits: relevant questions in the context of public decision making about health care programs. Med Care 29: 1246-1252
8. Kish L (1996) Survey sampling. Wiley: New York
9. Klose T (1999) The contingent valuation method in health care. Health Policy 47: 97-123
10. Krabbe PFM, Essink-Bot ML, Bonsel GJ (1997) The comparability and reliability of five health-state valuation methods. Soc Sci Med 45: 1641-1652
11. Marcoulides GA (1999) Generalizability theory: picking up where the Rasch IRT model leaves off? In: Embretson SE, Hershberger SL. (eds) The new rules of measurement: what every psychologist and educator should know. Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah
12. Norman GR, Streiner DL (2000) Biostatistics: the bare essentials. Becker: Hamilton
13. O'Brien B, Viramontes JL (1994) Willingness to pay: a valid and reliable measure of health state preference? Med Decis Making 14: 289-297
14. O'Connor AM, Boyd NF, Warde P et al. (1987) Eliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences. J Chronic Dis 40: 811-818
15. Olsen JA, Smith RD (2001) Theory versus practice: a review of 'willingness to pay' in health and health care. Health Econ 10: 39-52
16. Ryan M (1998) Valuing psychological factors in the provision of assisted reproductive techniques using the economic instrument of willingness to pay. J Econ Psychol 19: 179-204
17. Shiell A, Hawe P, Fletcher M (2003) Reliability of health utility measures and a test of values clarification. Soc Sci Med 56: 1531-1541
18. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86: 420-428
19. Streiner DL, Norman GR (1995) Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development. Oxford University Press: Oxford
20. Thompson MS, Read JL, Liang M (1984) Feasibility of willingness to pay measurement in chronic arthritis. Med Decis Making 4: 195-215
21. Van Agt HM, Essink-Bot ML, Krabbe PF, Bonsel GJ (1994) Test-retest reliability of health state valuations collected with the EuroQol questionnaire. Soc Sci Med 39: 1537-1544