Speech-clarity judgments of hearing-aid-processed speech in noise: Differing polar patterns and acoustic environments

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 319-330

  Amlani, Amyn M ^a,b   Rakerd, Brad ^a   Punch, Jerry L ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Directional microphone hearing aids; Omnidirectional microphone hearing aids; Paired comparisons; Polar patterns; Reverberation time

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HEARING; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MICROPHONE; MONAURAL HEARING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SPEECH; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; VIBRATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; ENVIRONMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOISE; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 33750041383     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14992020600582109     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Amlani, A.M. 2001. Efficacy of directional microphone hearing aids: A meta-analytic perspective. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 202-214.
2. Amlani, A.M. 2003. Paired-comparison preferences for polar directivity patterns in different listening environments. (Doctoral Dissertation, Michigan State University, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 5994.
3. Bentler, R.A., Egge, J.L.M., Tubbs, J.L., Dittberner, A.B. & Flamme, G.A. 2004a. Quantification of directional benefit across different polar response patterns. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 649-659.
4. Bentler, R.A., Palmer, C. & Dittberner, A.B. 2004b. Hearing-in-noise: Comparison of listeners with normal and (aided) impaired hearing. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 216-225.
5. Beranek, L.L. 1954. Acoustics. New York: McGraw-Hill Electrical and Electronic Engineering Series.
6. Boymans, M. & Dreschler, W.A. 2000. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality. Audiology, 39, 260-268.
7. Burkhard, M.D. & Sachs, R. 1975. Anthropometric manikin for acoustic research. J Acous Soc Am, 58, 214-222.
8. Byrne, D. 1986. Effects of frequency response characteristics on speech discrimination and perceived intelligibility and pleasantness of speech for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acous Soc Am, 80, 494-504.
9. Byrne, D. 1991. Evaluation measures of speech intelligibility and quality - Research and clinical application. In G.A. Studebaker, F. Bess & L. Beck (eds.) Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report II. Parkton, MD: York Press, pp. 195-199.
10. Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Ching, T., Katsch, R. & Keidser, G. 2001. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 37-51.
11. Byrne, D., Parkinson, A. & Newall, P. 1990. Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/profoundly hearing-impaired. Ear Hear, 11, 40-49.
12. Chasin, M. 1994. Improving signal-to-noise ratio with directional microphones. Hear Inst, 45(2), 31-33.
13. Cord, M.T., Surr, R.K., Walden, B.E. & Dyrlund, O. 2004. Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 353-364.
14. Cord, M.T., Surr, R.K., Walden, B.E. & Olson, L. 2002. Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 295-307.
15. Cox, R.M. & Alexander, G.C. 1991. Preferred hearing aid gain in everyday environments. Ear Hear, 12, 123-126.
16. Dillon, H. 1999. NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids. Hear J, 52(4), 10-16.
17. Dittberner, A. & Bentler, R. 2003. Interpreting the directivity index (DI). Hearing Rev, 10(6), 16, 18-19.
18. Dybala P. 1996. The effect of reverberation on omnidirectional, directional, and multimicrophone arrays. Poster presented at the American Academy of Audiology Annual Convention, Salt Lake City, Utah.
19. Fabry, D.A. & Schum, D.J. 1994. The role of subjective measurement techniques in hearing aid fittings. In M. Valente (ed.), Strategies for Selecting and Verifying Hearing Aid Fittings. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, pp. 136-155.
20. Hall, J.W. & Fernandes, M.A. 1983. Monaural and binaural intensity discrimination in normal and cochlear-impaired listeners. Audiol, 22, 364-371.
21. Hawkins, D.B. & Yacullo, W.S. 1984. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Speech Hear Disord, 49, 278-286.
22. Jerger, J. & Thelin, J. 1968. Effects of electroacoustic characteristics of hearing aids on speech understanding. Bull Pros Res, Fall, 159-185.
23. Keidser, G. 1996. Selecting different amplification for different listening conditions. J Am Acad Audiol, 7, 92-104.
24. Killion, M.C., Schulerin, R., Christensen, L., Fabry, D., Revit, L., et al. 1998. Real-world performance of an ITE directional microphone. Hear J, 51(4), 24-26, 30, 32, 35-36, 38.
25. Kuk, F. 1996. Subjective preference for microphone types in daily listening environments. Hear J, 49(4), 29-30, 32-35.
26. nd ed.). London: Elsevier Science Publishers, pp. 110-134.
27. Leeuw, A.R. & Dreschler, W.A. 1991. Advantages of directional hearing aid microphones related to room acoustics. Audiol, 30, 330-344.
28. Madison, T.K. & Hawkins, D.B. 1983. The signal-to-noise ratio advantage of directional microphones. Hear Inst, 34(2), 18, 49.
29. Mueller, H.G., Grimes, A.M. & Erdman, S.A. 1983. Subjective ratings of directional amplification. Hear Inst, 34(2), 14-16, 47-48.
30. Murray, N. & Byrne, D. 1986. Performance of hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with various high-frequency cut-offs in hearing aids. Austr J Audiol, 8, 21-28.
31. Naidoo, S.V. & Hawkins, D.B. 1997. Monaural/binaural preferences: Effect of hearing aid circuit on speech intelligibility and sound quality. J Am Acad Audiol, 8, 188-202.
32. Nielsen, H.B. 1973. A comparison between hearing aids with a directional microphone and hearing aids with conventional microphones. Scand Audiol, 2, 45-48.
33. Nielsen, H. & Ludvigsen, C. 1978. Effects of hearing aids with directional microphones in different acoustic environments. Scand Audiol, 7, 217-224.
34. Peutz, U.M.A. 1971. Articulation loss of consonants as a criterion for speech transmission in a room. J Audio Eng Soc, 19, 915-919.
35. Preminger, J., Neuman, A., Bakke, M., Walters, D. & Levitt, H. 2000. An examination of the practicality of the simplex procedure. Ear Hear, 21, 177-193.
36. Preves, D.A. 1997. Directional microphone use in ITE hearing instruments. Hear Rev, 4(7), 21-22, 24-27.
37. Preves, D.A., Sammeth, C.A. & Wynne, M.K. 1999. Field trial evaluations of a switched directional/omnidirectional ITE. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 273-284.
38. Punch, J.L. & Beck, E.L. 1980. Low-frequency response of hearing aids and judgments of aided speech quality. J Speech Hear Disord, 45, 325-335.
39. Punch, J.L. & Beck, L.B. 1986. Relative effects of low-frequency amplification on syllable recognition and speech quality. Ear Hear, 7, 57-62.
40. Punch, J. & Rakerd, B. 1993. Loudness matching of signals spectrally shaped by a simulated hearing aid. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 36, 357-364.
41. Punch, J.L., Robb, R. & Shovels, A.H. 1994. Aided listener preference in laboratory versus real-world environments. Ear Hear, 15, 50-61.
42. Rakerd, B., Punch, J., Hooks, W., Amlani, A. & Vander Velde, T.J. 1999. Loudness discrimination of speech signals spectrally shaped by a simulated hearing aid. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 42, 1285-1294.
43. Ricketts, T. 2000a. Directivity quantification in hearing aids: Fitting and measurement effects. Ear Hear, 21, 45-58.
44. Ricketts, T. 2000b. Impact of head angle on monaural and binaural performance with directional and omnidirectional hearing aids. Ear Hear, 21, 318-328.
45. Ricketts, T. 2000c. Impact of noise source configuration on directional hearing aid benefit and performance. Ear Hear, 21, 194-205.
46. Ricketts, T. & Dhar, S. 1999. Comparison of performance across three directional hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 180-189.
47. Ricketts, T. & Henry, P. 2002. Low-frequency-gain compensation in directional hearing aids. Am J Audiol, 11, 29-41.
48. Ricketts, T., Henry, P. & Gnewikow, D. 2003. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids. Ear Hear, 24, 424-439.
49. Ricketts, T. & Mueller, H.G. 1999. Making sense of directional microphone hearing aids. Am J Audiol, 8, 117-127.
50. Ricketts, T.A. & Hornsby, B.W.Y. 2003. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit. Ear Hear, 24, 472-484.
51. Sommers, M. 1979. Directional/non-directional hearing aids: One, the other, or both? Hear Aid J, 31(1), 7, 27.
52. Speaks, C., Trine, T.D., Crain, T.R. & Niccum, N. 1994. A revised Speech Intelligibility Rating (RSIR) test. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 110, 75-83.
53. Studebaker, G. 1982. Hearing aid selection: An overview. In G. Studebaker & F. Bess (eds.) The Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report: State of the Art Research Needs. Upper Darby, PA: Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, pp. 147-155.
54. Studebaker, G., Bisset, J. & Van Ort, D. 1980a. Paired comparison judgments of relative speech intelligibility. Paper presented at the meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Los Angeles, CA.
55. Studebaker, G.A., Cox, R.M. & Formby, C. 1980b. The effect of environment on the directional performance of head-worn hearing aids. In G.A. Studebaker & I. Hochberg (eds.) Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, pp. 81-105.
56. Surr, R.K., Walden, B.E., Cord, M.T. & Olson, L. 2002. Influence of environmental factors on hearing aid microphone performance. J Am Acad Audiol, 13, 308-322.
57. Valente, M. 1999. Use of microphone technology to improve user performance in noise. Trends Amp, 4, 112-135.
58. nd ed.). San Diego: Singular Thompson Learning, pp. 247-284.
59. Valente, M., Fabry, D.A. & Potts, L.G. 1995. Recognition of speech-in-noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. J Am Acad Audiol, 6, 440-449.
60. Valente, M., Fabry, D., Potts, L.G. & Sandlin, R. 1998. Comparing the performance of the Widex Senso digital hearing aid with analog hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 9, 342-360.
61. Walden, B.E., Surr, R.K., Cord, M.T. & Dyrlund, O. 2004. Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening. J Am Acad Audiol, 15, 365-396.
62. Walden, B.E., Surr, R.K., Cord, M.T., Edwards, B. & Olson, L. 2000. Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 540-560.