Controlled Support MEG imaging

NeuroImage

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 878-885

  Nagarajan, Srikantan S ^a   Portniaguine, Oleg ^b   Hwang, Dosik ^b   Johnson, Chris ^b   Sekihara, Kensuke ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

^c TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; DATA ANALYSIS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33750036702     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.023     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aliprantis C.D., and Burkinshaw O. Locally Solid Riesz Spaces (1978), Academic Press, New York and London
2. Baillet S., and Garnero L. A Bayesian approach to introducing anatomo-functional priors in the EEG/MEG inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 44 5 (1997) 374-385
3. Baillet, S., Mosher, J.C., Leahy, R.M., 2001. Electromagnetic brain mapping. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 18(6), 14--30.
4. Bertrand C., Hamada Y., and Kado H. MRI prior computation and parallel tempering algorithm: a probabilistic resolution of the MEG/EEG inverse problem. Brain Topogr. 14 1 (2001) 57-68
5. Bertrand C., Ohmi M., Suzuki R., and Kado H. A probabilistic solution to the MEG inverse problem via MCMC methods: the reversible jump and parallel tempering algorithms. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48 5 (2001) 533-542
6. Eckhart U. Weber's problem and Weiszfeld's algorithm in general spaces. Math. Program. 18 (1980) 186-196
7. Farquharson C.G., and Oldenburg D.W. Non-linear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure. Geophys. J. Int. 134 (1998) 213-227
8. Fletcher R. Practical Methods of Optimization (1981), Wiley and Sons
9. Gorodnitsky I.F., and George J.S. Neuromagnetic source imaging with focus: a recursive weighted minimum norm algorithm. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 95 4 (1995) 231-251
10. Gorodnitsky I.F., and Rao B.D. Sparse signal reconstruction from limited data using focus: a recursive weighted norm minimumization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 45 (1997) 600-616
11. Hadamard J. Sur les problemes aux derivees parielies et leur signification physique. Bull. Univ. Princeton (1902) 49-52 (in French)
12. Hamalainen M., Hari R., Ilmoniemi R.J., Knuutila J., and Lounasmaa O.V. Magnetoencephalography theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working brain. Rev. Modern Phys. 65 (1993) 413-497
13. Huang M.X., Mosher J.C., and Leahy R.M. A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. Phys. Med. Biol. 44 2 (1999) 423-440
14. Kozinska D., Carducci F., and Nowinski K. Automatic alignment of EEG/MEG and MRI data sets. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112 (2001) 1553-1561
15. Last B.J., and Kubik K. Compact gravity inversion. Geophysics 48 (1983) 713-721
16. Leahy R.M., Mosher J.C., Spencer M.E., Huang M.X., and Lewine J.D. A study of dipole localization accuracy for MEG and EEG using a human skull phantom. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 107 2 (1998) 159-173
17. Matsuura K., and Okabe Y. Selective minimum-norm solution of the biomagnetic inverse problem. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 42 6 (1995) 608-615
18. O'Leary D.P. Robust regression computation using iteratively reweighted least squares. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 11 (1990) 466-480
19. Pascual-Marqui R.D., and Biscay-Lirio R. Spatial resolution of neuronal generators based on EEG and MEG measurements. Int. J. Neurosci. 68 1-2 (1993) 93-105
20. Phillips J.W., Leahy R.M., and Mosher J.C. Meg-based imaging of focal neuronal current sources. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 16 3 (1997) 338-348
21. Portniaguine, O., 1999. Image focusing and data compression in the solution of geophysical inverse problems. PhD thesis, University of Utah.
22. Portniaguine O., and Zhdanov M.S. Focusing geophysical inversion images. Geophysics 64 (1999) 874-887
23. Sarvas J. Basic mathematical and electromagnetic concepts of the biomagnetic inverse problem. Phys. Med. Biol. 32 (1987) 11-22
24. Schmidt D.M., George J.S., and Wood C.C. Bayesian inference applied to the electromagnetic inverse problem. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7 3 (1999) 195-212
25. Tikhonov A.N., and Arsenin Y.V. Solution of Ill-posed Problems (1977), Winston and Sons
26. Uutela K., Hamalainen M., and Somersalo E. Visualization of magnetoencephalographic data using minimum current estimates. NeuroImage 10 2 (1999) 173-180
27. Wang J.Z., Williamson S.J., and Kaufman L. Magnetic source images determined by a lead-field analysis: the unique minimum-norm least-squares estimation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39 7 (1992) 665-675
28. Wolke R., and Schwetlick H. Iteratively reweighted least squares: algorithms, convergence analysis, and numerical comparisons. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 9 (1988) 907-921