On the evolution of e-Government: The user imperative

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2739, Issue , 2003, Pages 139-142

  Flak, Leif Skiftenes ^a   Moe, Carl Erik ^a   Sæbø, Øystein ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTERS;

COMPLEX BODIES; E-GOVERNMENTS; POTENTIAL BENEFITS; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; USER INVOLVEMENT;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 33750033328     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/10929179_25     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Layne, K., Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-Government: A four stage model. Government information quarterly Vol 18, issue 2, p 122 15p
2. nd European Conference on e-Government, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 39-48
3. Roy J (2003). E-Government - Introduction. Social science computer review.
4. Ho ATK (2002). Reinvening local governments and the e-Government initiative. Public administration review
5. Doucet, Kristin, 2001. Canada Ranks First in E-Government Services. CMA Management, Vol. 75 Issue 4, p 8.
6. Muir, A. and Oppenheim, C. (2002). National information policy developments worldwide: electronic government. Journal of information science, Vol 28, Issue 3, pp 173-186
7. Ives B and Olson MH (1984). User involvement and MIS success- a review of research. Management of science 30 (5)
8. Gallivan MJ, Keil M (2003). The user-developer communication process: a critical case study. Information system journal (1)
9. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. (1994). Measuring user participation, user involvement and user attitude. MIS quarterly, march 1994
10. Krenner, J. (2002). Reflections on the requirements gathering in a one-stop government project. Proceedings of Electronic Government, First international conference, EGOV, Aix-en-Provence, France, pp 124-128.
11. Heinderyckx, F. (2002). Assessing e-Government implementation processes: A pan-European survey of administrations officials. Proceedings of Electronic Government, First international conference, EGOV, Aix-en-Provence, France, pp 111-115
12. Christensen, T. and Egeberg, M. (1997). Forvaltningskunnskap. Tano Aschehoug
13. nd European Conference on E-Government, St Catherine's College, Oxford, UK, pp 79-89.
14. Klein G and Jiang JJ. (2001). Seeking consonance in information systems. Journal of System Software 56 (2): 195-202.
15. Vidgen R (1997). Stakeholders, soft systems and technology: Separation and mediation in the analysis of information system requirements. Information system journal 7 (1): 21-46
16. nd European Conference on E-Government, St Catherine's College, Oxford, UK, pp 419-423.
17. nd European Conference on E-Government, St Catherine's College, Oxford, UK, pp 299-311.
18. Clarke, T. (1998). The Stakeholder Corporation: A Business Philosophy for the Information Age, Long Range Planning, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 182-194
19. Kotter, J. P. and Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. The free press. New York.