Approaches to multiplicity issues in complex research in microarray analysis

Statistica Neerlandica

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 414-437

  Yekutieli, Daniel ^a   Reiner Benaim, Anat ^a   Benjamini, Yoav ^a   Elmer, Gregory I ^b   Kafkafi, Neri ^b   Letwin, Noah E ^c   Lee, Norman H ^c  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

False discovery rate; Hierarchical testing; High throughput analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750022361     PISSN: 00390402     EISSN: 14679574     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2006.00343.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. ABROMOVICH, F., Y. BENJAMINI, D. L. DONOHO and I. M. JOHNSTONE (1998), The amalgamation challenge to signal de-noising, Research paper of the Department of Statistics and OR, Tel Aviv University, RP-SOR-98-03.
2. BENJAMINI, Y. and Y. HOCHBERG (1995), Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 57, 289-300.
3. BENJAMINI, Y. and Y. HOCHBERG (2000), On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 25, 60-83.
4. BENJAMINI, Y. and D. YEKUTIELI (2001), The control of the false discovery rate under dependency, Annals of Statistics 29, 1165-1188.
5. BENJAMINI, Y. and D. YEKUTIELI (2005), Quantitative trait loci analysis using the false discovery rate, Genetics 171, 783-790.
6. BENJAMINI, Y., Y. HOCHBERG and Y. KLING (1999), False discovery rate controlling procedures for pairwise comparisons, Technical Report, Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Tel-Aviv.
7. BENJAMINI, Y., A. KRIEGER and D. YEKUTIELI (2001), Two-staged linear step-up FDR controlling procedure (Revised, 2003). Department of Statistics and Operation Research, Tel-Aviv University, and Department of Statistics, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Technical Report.
8. BONHOMME, F. and J. L. GUENET (1996), The laboratory mouse and its wild relatives, in: M. F. LYON, S. RASTAN and S. D. M. BROWN (eds.), Genetic variants and strains of the laboratory mouse, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1577-1596.
9. COWLES C. R., J. N. HIRSCHHORN, D. ALTSHULER and E. S. LANDER (2002), Detection of regulatory variation in mouse genes, Nature Genetics 32, 432-437.
10. EFRON, B., R. TIBSHIRANI, J. D. STOREY and V. TUSHER (2001), Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment, Journal of the American Statistical Association 96, 1151-1160.
11. EMERSON, J. D. and G. Y. WONG (1985), Resistant nonadditive fits for two-way tables, in: D. C. HOAGLIN, D. MOSTELLER and J. W. TUKEY (eds.), Exploring data tables, trends and shapes, Wiley, New York, 67-124.
12. HOCHBERG, Y. and Y. BENJAMINI (1990), More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing, Statistics in Medicine 9, 811-818.
13. GENOVESE, C. and L. WASSERMAN (2002), Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 64, 499-517.
14. JIANG, H. (2004), A two step procedure for multiple pairwise comparisons in microarray experiments, PhD thesis, Department of Statistics, Purdue University.
15. KAFKAFI, N., Y. BENJAMINI, A. SAKOV, G. I. ELMER and I. GOLANI (2005), Genotype-environment interactions in mouse behavior: a way out of the problem, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102, 4619-4624.
16. KESSELMAN, H. J., R. CRIBBLE and B. HOLLAND (1999), The pairwise multiple comparison multiplicity problem: an alternative approach to familywise and comparisonwise type I error control, Psychological Methods 4, 58-69.
17. LEE, H., J. C. M. DEKKERS, M. SOLLER, M. MALEK, R. I. FERNANDO and M. F. ROTHSCHILD (2002), Application of the false discovery rate to quantitative trait loci interval mapping with multiple traits, Genetics 161, 905-914.
18. LE ROY, I., P. L. ROUBERTOUX, L. JAMOT, F. MAAROUF, S. TORDJMAN, S. MORTAUD, C. BLANCHARD, B. MARTIN, P.-V. GUILLOT and V. DUQUENNE (1998), Neuronal and behavioural differences between mus musculus domesticus (C57BL/6JBy) and Mus musculus castaneus (CAST/Ei), Behavioral Brain Research 95, 135-142.
19. REINER, A., D. YEKUTIELI and Y. BENJAMINI (2003), Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures, Bioinformatics 19, 368-75.
20. SCHWEDER, T. and E. SPJØVTOLL (1982), Plots of P-values to evaluate many tests simultaneously, Biometrika 69, 493-502.
21. STOREY, J. D. (2002), A direct approach to false discovery rates, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 64, 479-498.
22. STOREY, J. D. (2003), The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value, Annals of Statistics 31, 2013-2035.
23. STOREY, J. D. and R. TIBSHIRANI (2003), SAM thresholding and false discovery rates for detecting differential gene expression in DNA microarrays, in: G. PARMIGIANI, E. S. GARRETT, R. A. IRIZARRY and S. L. ZEGER (eds.), The analysis of gene expression data: methods and software, Springer, New York, 272-290.
24. STOREY J. D., J. E. TAYLOR and D. SIEGMUND (2004), Strong control, conservative point estimation, and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 66, 187-205.
25. TUKEY, J. W. (1977), Exploratory data analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
26. TURKHEIMER, F. E., C. B. SMITH, and K. SCHMIDT (2001), Estimation of the "true" null hypotheses in multivariate analysis of neuroimaging data. Neuroimage 13, 920-930.
27. TUSHER, V., R. TIBSHIRANI and G. CHU (2001), Significance analysis of microarrays applied to transcriptional responses to ionizing radiation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 98, 5116-5121.
28. WESTFALL, P. H. and S. S. YOUNG (1993), Resampling based multiple testing, Wiley, New York.
29. YEKUTIELI, D. (2002a), Theoretical results needed for applying the false discovery rate in statistical problems, PhD Thesis, Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Tel-Aviv University.
30. YEKUTIELI, D. (2002b), Elkund-Seeger-Simes is conservative for testing all pairwise comparisons, Technical Report, Department of Statistics and Operations Research, University of Tel-Aviv.