Implications of intersubjectivity for supervisory practice

Clinical Social Work Journal

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 253-265

  Cait, Cheryl Anne ^a  

^a WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Death; Intersubjectivity; Second individuation process; Supervision

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750021807     PISSN: 00911674     EISSN: 15733343     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10615-005-0014-4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Altman, N. (1995). The analyst in the inner city, Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
2. Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in Psychonanalysis, Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
3. Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death, New York: The Free Press.
4. Benjamin, J. (1988). The bonds of love, New York: Pantheon Books.
5. Benjamin, J. (1995). Like subjects, love objects, New Haven: Yale University Press.
6. Benjamin, J. (1999). Recognition and destruction: An outline of intersubjectivty (1990), In S. T. Mitchell & L. Aron (Eds.), Relational Psychoanalysis the emergence of a tradition (pp. 181-210). Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
7. Berman, E. (1997). Psychoanalytic supervision as the crossroads of a relational matrix, In M. H. Rock (Eds.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 161-185). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
8. Blos, P., (1967). The second individuation process of adolescence. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child (Vol. 22, pp. 162-186). New York: International Universities Press.
9. Dunkel, J., & Hatfield, S., (1986). Counter-transference issues in working with persons with AIDS. Social Work, March-April, 114-117.
10. Farber, E. (1994), Psychotherapy with HIV and AIDS patients: The phenomenon of helplessness in therapists. Psychotherapy, 31(4, Winter), 715-723.
11. Fiscalini, J. (1985). On supervisory parataxis and dialogue. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 21(4), 91-608.
12. Fosshage, J. (1997). Toward a model of psychoanalytic supervision from a self-sychological/ intersubjective perspective, In M. H. Rock (Eds.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 189-210). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
13. Gediman, H., & Wokenfleld, F. (1990), The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis; Its reconsideration as a triadic system, Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 49, 234-255.
14. Habermas, J. (1970). A theory of communicative competence, In H. P. Dreitzel (Eds.), Recent sociology, 2New York: Macmillan.
15. Hoffmann, I. Z. (1991). Discussion: Toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1, 74-105.
16. Kron, T., & Yerushalmi, H. (2000). The intersubjective approach in supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 19(1), 99-120.
17. Lachmann, F., & Beebe, B. (1992). Representational and self-object transferences: A developmental perspective, In A. Goldberg (Eds.), New therapeutic visions, progress in self-psychology (pp. 3-15). 8Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
18. Mahler, M. (1963). Thoughts about development and individuation. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 18, 307-324.
19. Marshall, R. J. (1997). The interactional triad in supervision, In M. H. Rock (Eds.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 77-101). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
20. Mattei, L. (1999). A Latina space: Ethnicity as an intersubjective third. Smith Studies in Social Work, 69(2), 255-267.
21. McLaughlin, J. T. (1991). Clinical and theoretical aspects of enactment. Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 39, 595-614.
22. Morgan, J. D. (1995). A philosopher looks at children and death, In E. A. Grollman (Eds.), Bereaved children and teens (pp. 159-168). Boston: Beacon Press.
23. Oarnge, Atwood, Stolorow, (1997). Working intersubjectively: Contextualism in psychoanalytic practice. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
24. Ogden, T. (1994). Subjects of analysis, Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
25. Renik, O. (1996). The perils of neutrality. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 65, 495-517.
26. Ringel, S. (2001). In the shadow of death: Relational paradigms in clinical supervision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 29(2), 171-179.
27. Stolorow, R., & Atwood, G. E. (1992). Contexts of being, Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
28. Wolkenfield, F. (1990), The parallel process phenomenon revisited: Some additional thoughts about the supervisory process, In R. C. Lane (Eds.), Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision (pp. 95-112). New York: Brunner/Mazel.