Personal influence and the effects of the national youth anti-drug media campaign

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 608, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 282-300

  Hornik, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Antidrug campaign; Drug use; Mass media; Personal influence; Sibling; Two step flow

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750007689     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: 15523349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716206291972     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Allen, Mike, William A. Donohue, Amy Griffin, Dan Ryan, and Monique Mitchell Turner. 2003. Comparing the influence of parents and peers on the choice to use drugs. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 30 (2). 163-186.
2. Austin, Erica W., Bruce E. Pinkleton, and Yuki Fujioka. 2000. The role of interpretation processes and parental discussion in the media's effects on adolescents' use of alcohol. Pediatrics 105: 343-349.
3. Austin, Erica W., and J. Yin. 2003. The relationship of parental reinforcement of media messages to college students' alcohol-related behaviors. Journal of Health Communication 8: 157-169.
4. Ennett, Susan T., Karl E. Baumann, Vangie E. Foshee, Michael Pemberton, and Katherine A. Hicks. 2001. Parent-child communication about adolescent tobacco and alcohol use: What do parents say and does it affect youth behavior? Journal of Marriage and Family 63: 48-62.
5. Hornik, Robert, David Maklan, Diane Cadell, Carlin Barmada, Lela Jacobsohn, Vani Henderson, Anca Romantan, Jeffrey Niederdeppe, Robert Orwin, Sanjeev Sridharan, Robert Baskin, Adam Chu, Carol Morin, Kristie Taylor, and Diane Steele. 2003. Evaluation of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign: 2003 report of findings. Washington, DC: Westat.
6. Katz, Elihu, and Paul Lazarsfeld. 1955/2006. Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. 2nd ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
7. Nathanson, Amy I. 1999. Identifying and explaining the relationship between parental mediation and children's aggression. Communication Research 26 (2). 124-143.
8. Nathanson, Amy I. 2001. Parents vs. peers: Exploring the significance of peer mediation of antisocial television. Communication Research 28 (3). 215-274.
9. Rogers, Everett. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
10. Ryan, Bryce, and Neal C. Gross. 1943. The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology 8 (1). 15-24.
11. Wright, Charles R. 1989. Mass communication: A sociological perspective. 3rd ed. New York: Random House.