Contrasting patterns of body shape and neutral genetic divergence in marine and lake populations of threespine sticklebacks

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1803-1812

  Leinonen, T ^a   Cano, J M ^a   Makinen H ^a   Merila J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Body shape; FST; Gasterosteus aculeatus; Genetic drift; Geographic variation; Natural selection; PST; QST

Indexed keywords

FRESH WATER; SEA WATER;

BODY SHAPE; FISH; FRESHWATER; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC MARKER; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; HABITAT; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE; SEAWATER;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FINLAND; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MALE; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; SCANDINAVIA; SMEGMAMORPHA;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; FINLAND; FRESH WATER; GENETICS, POPULATION; MALE; PHENOTYPE; SCANDINAVIA; SEAWATER; SMEGMAMORPHA;

GASTEROSTEUS; GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS;

EID: 33749991791     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01182.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adams, D.C. & Funk, D.J. 1997. Morphometric inferences on sibling species and sexual dimorphism in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles: multivariate applications of the thin-plate spline. Syst. Biol. 46: 180-194.
2. Bell, M.A. & Foster, S.A. (eds.) 1994. The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback. Oxford Science, New York.
3. Bookstein, F.L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Caldecutt, W.J. & Adams, D.C. 1998. Morphometrics of trophic osteology in the threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Copeia 1998: 827-838.
5. Cardini, A. & O'Higgins, P. 2004. Patterns of morphological evolution in Marmota (Rodentia, Sciuridae): geometric morphometrics of the cranium in the context of marmot phylogeny, ecology and conservation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82: 385-407.
6. Caumul, R. & Polly, P.D. 2005. Phylogenetic and environmental components of morphological variation: skull, mandible, and molar shape in marmots (Marmota, Rodentia). Evolution 59: 2460-2472.
7. Couette, S., Escarguel, G. & Montuire, S. 2005. Constructing, bootstrapping, and comparing morphometric and phylogenetic trees: a case study of new world monkeys (Platyrrhini, primates). J. Mammal. 86: 773-781.
8. Degerman, E., Hammar, J., Nyberg, P. & Svärdson, G. 2001. Human impact on the fish diversity in the four lakes of Sweden. Ambio 30: 522-528.
9. Douglas, M.E., Douglas, M.R., Lynch, J.M. & McElroy, D.M. 2001. Use of geometric morphometrics to differentiate Gila (Cyprinidae) within the Upper Colorado River Basin. Copeia 2001: 389-400.
10. England, P.R., Osler, G.H.R., Woodworth, L.M., Montgomery, M.E., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. 2003. Effects of intense versus diffuse population bottlenecks on microsatellite genetic diversity and evolutionary potential. Cons. Gen. 4: 595-604.
11. Eronen, M., Glückert, G., Hatakka, L., van der Plassche, O., van der Plicht, J. & Rantala, P. 2001. Rates of Holocene isostatic uplift and relative sea-level lowering of the Baltic in SW Finland based on studies of isolation contacts. Boreas 30: 17-30.
12. Felsenstein, J. 2004. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
13. Gelman, A. J., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S. & Rubin, D. 2004. Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London.
14. Goudet, J. 2001. FSTAT: A Computer Program to Estimate and Test Gene Diversities and Fixation Indices (version 2.9.3.1). Available at: www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.html.
15. Hendry, A.P. & Taylor, E.B. 2004. How much of the variation in adaptive divergence can be explained by gene flow? An evaluation using lake-stream stickleback pairs. Evolution 58: 2319-2331.
16. Hendry, A.P., Taylor, E.B. & McPhail, J.D. 2002. Adaptive divergence and the balance between selection and gene flow: lake and stream stickleback in the Misty system. Evolution 56: 1199-1216.
17. Jones, L.P., Frankham, R. & Barker, J.S.F. 1968. The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila II. Long-term response. Genet. Res. 12: 249-266.
18. Klingenberg, C.P. & Leamy, L.J. 2001. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution 55: 2342-2352.
19. Kristjansson, B.K., Skulason, S. & Noakes, D.L.G. 2002. Morphological segregation of Icelandic threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76: 247-257.
20. Lande, R. 1976. Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution. Evolution 30: 314-334.
21. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402-416.
22. Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
23. Langerhans, R.B. & DeWitt, T.J. 2004. Shared and unique features of evolutionary diversification. Am. Nat. 164: 335-349.
24. Lee, C.E. & Frost, B.W. 2002. Morphological stasis in the Eurythemora affinis species complex (Copepoda: Temoridae). Hydrobiologia 480: 111-128.
25. Lynch, M. 1990. The rate of morphological evolution in mammals from the standpoint of the neutral expectation. Am. Nat. 136: 727-741.
26. McKinnon, J.S. & Rundle, H.D. 2002. Speciation in nature: the threespine stickleback model systems. TREE 17: 480-488.
27. McPhail, J.D. 1984. Ecology and evolution of sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteus): morphological and genetic evidence for a species pair in Enos Lake, British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 62: 1402-1408.
28. McPhail, J.D. 1994. Speciation and evolution of reproductive isolation. In: The Evolutionary Biology of the Threespine Stickleback (M. A. Bell & S. A. Foster, eds). Oxford Science, New York.
29. Mantel, N.A. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27: 209-220.
30. McKay, J.K. & Latta, R.G. 2002. Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. TREE 17: 285-291.
31. Merilä, J. & Crnokrak, P. 2001. Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 892-903.
32. Merilä, J., Björklund, M. & Baker, A.J. 1997. Historical demography and present day population structure of the greenfinch, Carduelis chloris - an analysis of mtDNA controlregion sequences. Evolution 51: 946-956.
33. Monteiro, L.R., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., dos Reis, S.F. & Araujo, E.D. 2002. Geometric estimates of heritability of biological shape. Evolution 56: 563-572.
34. Münzing, J. 1963. The evolution of variation and distributional patterns in European populations of the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Evolution 17: 320-332.
35. Mäkinen, H.S., Cano, J.M. & Merilä, J. 2006. Genetic relationships among marine and freshwater populations of the European three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) revealed by microsatellites. Mol. Ecol. 15: 1519-1534.
36. Niemelä, E. & Vilhunen, J. 1987. Utsjoen tunturivesien kalakantojen käyttö- ja hoitosuunnitelma 1987. Riista-ja kalatalouden tutkimuslaitos, Helsinki. In Finnish.
37. Page, R. D. M. 1996. TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 12: 357-358.
38. Pritchard, J.R. & Schluter, D. 2001. Declining interspecific competition during character displacement: summoning the ghost of competition past. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3: 209-220.
39. Raeymaekers, J.A.M., Maes, G.E., Audenaert, E. & Volckaert, F.A.M. 2005. Detecting Holocene divergence in the anadromous-freshwater three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) system. Mol. Ecol. 14: 1001-1014.
40. Reimchen, T.E. & Nosil, P. 2004. Variable predation regimes predict the evolution of sexual dimorphism in a population of threespine stickleback. Evolution 58: 1274-1281.
41. Robertson, A. 1960. A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 153: 234-249.
42. Rohlf, F.J. 1998. On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 47: 147-158.
43. Rohlf, F.J. 2000. NTSYS-pc: Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System, version 2.11s. Exeter Software, Setauket, NY.
44. Rohlf, F.J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55: 2143-2160.
45. Rohlf, F.J. 2002a. tpsDig, digitize landmarks and outlines, version 1.37. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
46. Rohlf, F.J. 2002b. tpsRelw, relative wraps analysis, version 1.31. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
47. Rohlf, F.J. 2003. tpsSmall, version 1.20. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
48. Rohlf, F.J. 2004. tpsRegr, shape regression, version 1.30. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
49. Rohlf, F.J. & Marcus, L.F. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. TREE 8: 129-132.
50. Rohlf, F.J. & Slice, D.S. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39: 40-59.
51. Rohlf, F.J., Loy, A. & Corti, M. 1996. Morphometric analysis of Old World Talpidae (Mammalia, Insectivora) using partial-warp scores. Syst. Biol. 45: 344-362.
52. Saint-Laurent, R., Legault, M & Bernatchez, L. 2003. Divergent selection maintains adaptive differentiation despite high gene flow between sympatric rainbow smelt ecotypes (Osmerus mordax Mitchill). Mol. Ecol. 12: 315-330.
53. Schluter, D, Clifford, E.A., Nemethy, M. & McKinnon, J.S. 2004. Parallel evolution and inheritance of quantitative traits. Am. Nat. 163: 809-822.
54. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Thomas, A., Best, N.G. & Lunn, D. 2003. WinBUGS. Version 1.4. User manual. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK.
55. Spitze, K. 1993. Population structure in Daphnia obtusa: quantitative genetic and allozymic variation. Genetics 135: 367-374.
56. Storz, J. 2002. Contrasting patterns of divergence in quantitative traits and neutral DNA markers: analysis of clinal variation. Mol. Ecol. 11: 2537-2551.
57. Taylor, E.B. & McPhail, J.D. 2000. Historical contingency and ecological determinism interact to prime speciation in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 2375-2384.
58. Taylor, E.B., Boughman, J.W., Groenenboom, M., Sniatynski, M., Schluter, D. & Gow, J.L. 2006. Speciation in reverse: morphological and genetic evidence of the collapse of a three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) species pair. Mol. Ecol. 15: 343-355.
59. Volis, S., Yakubov, B., Shulgina, I., Ward, D. & Mendlinger, S. 2005. Distinguishing adaptive from nonadaptive genetic differentiation: comparison of QST and FST at two spatial scales. Heredity 95: 466-475.
60. Walker, J.A. 1997. Ecological morphology of lacustrine three-spine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus L. (Gasterosteidae) body shape. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61: 3-50.
61. Walker, J.A. & Bell, M.A. 2000. Net evolutionary trajectories of body shape evolution within a microgeographic radiation of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J. Zool. Lond. 252: 293-302.
62. Weber, K.E. & Diggins, L.T. 1990. Increased selection response in larger populations. II. Selection for ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster at two population sizes. Genetics 125: 585-597.
63. Weir, B.S. & Cockerham, C.C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370
64. Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.