Lightweight email signatures

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4116 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 288-302

  Adida, Ben ^a   Chau, David ^a   Hohenberger, Susan ^b   Rivest, Ronald L ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b IBM RESEARCH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; PUBLIC KEY CRYPTOGRAPHY; SECURITY OF DATA; WEBSITES;

EMAIL PERSONALITIES; IDENTITY-BASED SIGNATURES; LIGHTWEIGHT EMAIL SIGNATURES (LES);

ELECTRONIC MAIL;

EID: 33749991591     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11832072_20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. B. Adida, S. Hohenberger, and R. L. Rivest. Ad-hoc-group signatures from hijacked keypairs, 2005. http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~rivest/publications.
2. American Banking Association. Beware of Internet Scrooges this Holiday, http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/041209/dcth013_1.html.
3. Anti-Phishing Working Group. http://www.antiphishing.org/.
4. Anti-Phishing Working Group. Digital Signatures to Fight Phishing Attacks. http://www.antiphishing.org/smim-dig-sig.htm.
5. M. Bellare, C. Namprempre, and G. Neven. Security proofs for identity-based identification and signature schemes. In EUROCRYPT, pp. 268-286, 1999.
6. S. M. Bellovin. Spamming, phishing, authentication, and privacy. Inside Risks, Communications of the ACM, 47:12, December 2004.
7. N. Borisov, I. Goldberg, and E. Brewer. Off-the-record communication, or, why not to use PGP. In WPES '04, pp. 77-84. ACM Press, 2004.
8. D. R. Brown. Deniable authentication with rsa and multicasting. In Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2005/056, 2005.
9. R. Cramer, I. Damgård, and B. Schoenmakers. Proofs of partial knowledge and simplified design of witness hiding protocols. In CRYPTO, pp. 174-187, 1994.
10. M. Crispin. RFC 1730: Internet Mail Access Protocol - Version 4, Dec. 1994.
11. R. Dhamija and J. D. Tygar. Phish. and hips: Human interactive proofs to detect phishing attacks. In HIP, vol. 3517 of LNCS, pp. 127-141, 2005.
12. E. D. et. al. Spam Attacks: P2P to the Rescue. In WWW '04, pp. 358-359, 2004.
13. M. C. et. al. Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure (latest draft). IETF Internet Drafts, Jan. 2005.
14. S. L. Garfinkel. Email-Based Identification and Authentication: An Alternative to PKI? IEEE Security & Privacy, 1(6):20-26, Nov. 2003.
15. L. C. Guillou and J.-J. Quisquater. A "paradoxical" identity-based signature scheme resulting from zero-knowledge. In CRYPTO, vol. 403, pp. 216-231, 1988.
16. A. Herzberg. Controlling spam by secure internet content selection. In 4th Security in Communication Networks (SCN), vol. 3352 of LNCS, pp. 337-350, 2004.
17. P. Huffman. SMTP Service Exten. for Secure SMTP over Transport Layer Security. Internet Mail Consortium RFC. http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3207.html.
18. IETF. The DKIM Working Group, http://mipassoc.org/dkim/.
19. IETF. MTA Authorization Records in DNS (MARID), June 2004. http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/OLD/marid-charter.html.
20. M. Jakobsson. Modeling and Preventing Phishing Attacks. In A. Patrick and M. Yung, editors, Financial Cryptography '05, LNCS, 2005.
21. M. Jakobsson, K. Sako, and R. Impagliazzo. Designated verifier proofs and their applications. In EUROCRYPT '96, vol. 1233 of LNCS, 1996.
22. H. Krawczyk and T. Rabin. Chameleon signatures. In Network and Distributed System Security (NDSS), 2000.
23. J. Levine, A. DeKok, and et al. Lightweight MTA Authentication Protocol (LMAP) Discussion and Comparison, Feb. 2004. http://www.taugh.com/draft-irtf- asrg-lmap-discussion-01.txt.
24. J. R. Levine. A Flexible Method to Validate SMTP Senders in DNS, 2004. http: //www1.ietf.org/proceedings_new/04nov/IDs/draft-levine-fsv-01.txt.
25. MAPS. RBL - Realtime Blackhole List, 1996. http://www.mail-abuse.com/ services/mds_rbl.html.
26. J. Mason. Filtering Spam with SpamAssassin. In HEANet Conference, 2002.
27. MessageLabs. Annual Email Security Report, Dec. 2004. http://www.messagelabs.com/intelligence/2004report.
28. T. Meyer and B. Whateley. SpamBayes: Effective open-source, Bayesian based, email classification system. In Conference on Email and Anti-Spam, July 2004.
29. Microsoft. Phishing Scams: 5 Ways to Help Protect Your Identity. http://www.microsoft.com/athome/security/email/phishing.mspx.
30. Microsoft. The Sender ID Framework, http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ safety/technologies/senderid/default.mspx.
31. J. Myers. RFC 1939: Post Office Protocol - Version 3, May 1996.
32. Z. News. http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9595_22-519795.html?legacy=zdnn.
33. R. L. Rivest, A. Shamir, and Y. Tauman. How to leak a secret. In ASIACRYPT '01, vol. 2248 of LNCS, pp. 552-565, 2001.
34. M. Sahami, S. Dumais, D. Heckerman, and E. Horvitz. A Bayesian Approach to Filtering Junk E-Mail. In Learning for Text Categorization, May 1998.
35. B. Schneier. Safe Personal Computing. Schneier On Security Weblog, Dec. 2004. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2004/12/safe_personal_c.html.
36. A. Shamir. Identity-based cryptosystems and signature schemes. In CRYPTO '84, vol. 196 of LNCS, pp. 47-53, 1985.
37. D. Smetters and G. Durfee. Domain-based administration of identity-based cryptosystems for secure email and IPSEC. In USENIX Security Symposium, 2003.
38. The Spamhaus Project. The Spamhaus Block List. http://www.spamhaus.org/ sbl/.
39. Tumbleweed Communications. Digitally-Signed Emails to Protect Against Phishing Attacks. http://www.tumbleweed.com/solutions/finance/antiphishing.html.
40. P. Zimmerman. Pretty Good Privacy, http://www.pgp.com.