Plume-in-grid modeling for particulate matter

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 40, Issue 38, 2006, Pages 7280-7297

  Karamchandani, Prakash ^a   Vijayaraghavan, Krish ^a   Chen, Shu Yun ^a   Seigneur, Christian ^a   Edgerton, Eric S ^b  

^a ATMOSPHERIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b Atmospheric Research and Analysis Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

CMAQ; Plume chemistry; PM2.5; SCICHEM; SEARCH; Subgrid scale

Indexed keywords

CMAQ; PLUME CHEMISTRY; PM2.5; SCICHEM; SEARCH; SUBGRID-SCALE;

AEROSOLS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NITROGEN OXIDES;

PARTICLES (PARTICULATE MATTER);

OZONE; SULFATE;

AEROSOL; ERROR ANALYSIS; MODEL TEST; NITRATE; PLUME; SULFATE; TRANSFORMATION;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PARTICULATE MATTER; PLUME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 33749990386     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.033     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Byun D.W., and Schere K. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Applied Mechanics Review 59 (2006) 51-77
2. Edgerton E.S., Hartsell B.E., and Jansen J.J. Mercury speciation in coal-fired power plant plumes observed at three surface sites in the southeastern U.S. Environmental Science & Technology 40 (2006) 4563-4570
3. Gillani N.V., Meagher J.F., Valente R.J., Imhoff R.E., Tanner R.L., and Luria M. Relative production of ozone and nitrates in urban and rural power plant plumes 1. Composite results based on data from 10 field measurements days. Journal of Geophysical Research 103 (1998) 22593-22615
4. Godowitch, J., 2004. Simulations of aerosols and photochemical species with the CMAQ plume-in-grid modeling system. In: Third Annual CMAS Models-3 User's Conference, 18-20 October, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
5. Hansen D.A., Edgerton E.S., Hartsell B.E., Jansen J.J., Kandasamy N., Hidy G.M., and Blanchard C.L. The Southeastern aerosol research and characterization study: part 1-overview. Journal of Air Waste Management Association 53 (2003) 1460-1471
6. Karamchandani P., Koo A., and Seigneur C. A reduced gas-phase kinetic mechanism for atmospheric plume chemistry. Environmental Science & Technology 32 (1998) 1709-1720
7. Karamchandani P., and Seigneur C. Simulation of sulfate and nitrate chemistry in power plant plumes. Journal of Air Waste Management Association 49 (1999) PM175-PM181
8. Karamchandani P., Santos L., Sykes I., Zhang Y., Tonne C., and Seigneur C. Development and evaluation of a state-of-the-science reactive plume model. Environmental Science & Technology 34 (2000) 870-880
9. Karamchandani P., Seigneur C., Vijayaraghavan K., and Wu S.-Y. Development and application of a state-of-the-science plume-in-grid model. Journal of Geophysical Research 107 (2002) 4403-4415
10. Kumar N., and Russell A.G. Development of a computationally efficient, reactive subgrid-scale plume model and the impact in the northeastern United States using increasing levels of chemical detail. Journal of Geophysical Research 101 (1996) 16737-16744
11. Nenes A., Pandis S.N., and Pilinis C. Continued development and testing of a new thermodynamic aerosol module for urban and regional air quality models. Atmospheric Environment 33 (1999) 1553-1560
12. Pun, B.K., Seigneur, C., Knipping, E., 2004. Optimizing secondary organic aerosol representation in particulate matter air quality models. In: AWMA Regional and Global Perspectives on Haze: Causes, Consequences and Controversies-Visibility Specialty Conference, Asheville, NC.
13. Richards L.W., Anderson J.A., Blumenthal D.L., Brandt A., McDonald J.A., Waters N., Macias E.S., and Bhardwaja P.S. The chemistry, aerosol physics and optical properties of a western coal-fired power plant plume. Atmospheric Environment 15 (1981) 2111-2134
14. Seigneur C., Tesche T.W., Roth P.M., and Liu M.K. On the treatment of point source emissions in urban air quality modeling. Atmospheric Environment 17 (1983) 1655-1676
15. Seigneur C., Pun B., Pai P., Louis J.-F., Solomon P., Emery C., Morris R., Zahniser M., Worsnop D., Koutrakis P., White W., and Tombach I. Guidance for the performance evaluation of three-dimensional air quality modeling systems for particulate matter and visibility. Journal of Air Waste Management Association 50 (2000) 588-599
16. Sykes R.I., and Henn D.S. Representation of velocity gradient effects in a Gaussian puff model. Journal of Applied Meteorology 34 (1995) 2715-2723
17. Sykes, R.I., Lewellen, W.S., Parker, S.F., Henn, D.S., 1988. A hierarchy of dynamic plume models incorporating uncertainty, volume 4: second-order closure integrated puff. EPRI EA-6095 volume 4, Project 1616-28, EPRI, Palo Alto, CA.
18. Sykes R.I., Parker S.F., Henn D.S., and Lewellen W.S. Numerical simulation of ANATEX tracer data using a turbulence closure model for long-range dispersion. Journal of Applied Meteorology 32 (1993) 929-947
19. Vijayaraghavan K., Karamchandani P., and Seigneur C. Plume-in-grid modeling of summer air pollution in central California. Atmospheric Environment 40 (2006) 5097-5109
20. Zhang, Y., Pun, B., Vijayaraghavan, K., Wu, S.-Y., Seigneur, C., Pandis, S.N., Jacobson, M.Z., Nenes, A., Seinfeld, J.H., 2004. Development and application of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization, and Dissolution (MADRID). Journal of Geophysical Research 109, doi:10.1029/2003JD003501.