Comparing the effects of judicial versus child protective service relationships on parental attitudes in the juvenile dependency process

Research on Social Work Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 582-590

  Ashford, José B ^a,b  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Child dependency; Family drug courts; Procedural justice; Substance abusing parents

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749872410     PISSN: 10497315     EISSN: 15527581     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049731506289726     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1999, P.L. 105-89, 111 Stat. 2155 ( 1999 ).
2. Ashford, J. B. (2004). Treating substance-abusing parents: A study of the Pima County Family Drug Court approach. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 55, 27-37.
3. Ashford, J. B., & Faith, R. L. (2004). Testing models of justice and trust: A study of mediation in child dependency disputes. Social Work Research, 28, 18-27.
4. Ashford, J. B., & Holschuh, J. (2006). Fairness issues in law and mental health: Directions for future social work research. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 33, 131-152.
5. Awad, A. G. (1999). Antipsychotic medications in schizophrenia: How satisfied are our patients? In A. G. Awad (Ed.), Clear perspectives-management issues in schizophrenia: Patient satisfaction: Compliance and outcomes in schizophrenia (pp. 1-6). London: Shire Hall.
6. Awad, A. G. (2004). Antipsychotic medications: Compliance and attitude towards treatment. Current Opinion Psychiatry, 17, 75-80.
7. Azar, S. T., & Benjet, C. L. (1994). A cognitive perspective of ethnicity, race, and termination of parental rights. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 249-268.
8. Beck, C. J. A., & Sales, B. D. (2001). Family mediation: Facts, myths, and future prospects. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9. Belenko, S. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
10. Brockner, J., & Siegel, P. (1996). Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 390-413). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists. Philadelphia: Routledge.
12. Children and family futures: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Human Resources of the Committee on Ways and Means, 106th Cong., 2 (2000) (testimony of Nancy K. Young).
13. Cramer, D. (2003). Advanced quantitative data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15. Edwards, L. P. (2003). The juvenile dependency drug treatment court of Santa Clara County, California. In B. J. Winick & D. B. Wexler (Eds.), Judging in a therapeutic key: Therapeutic jurisprudence and the courts (pp. 39-42). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
16. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Harrell, A. (2003). Judging drug courts: Balancing the evidence. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 207-212.
18. Howgego, I. M., Yellowlees, P., Owen, C., Meldrum, L., & Dark, F. (2003). The therapeutic alliance: The key to effective patient outcome? A descriptive review of the evidence in community mental health case management. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 37, 169-183.
19. Jellinek, R., Murphy, J. M., Poitrast, F., Quinn, D., Bishop, S. J., & Goshko, M. (1992). Serious child mistreatment in Massachusetts: The course of 206 children through the courts. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 179-185.
20. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
21. Lovato, N., & Mack, K. (2003, March/April). Courts that heal. Children's Voice. Available at www.cwla.org
22. McGee, C. H. (1997). Family drug court: Another permanency perspective. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 48 (4). 65-67.
23. Melton, G. B., Petrilia, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. New York: Guilford.
24. National Center on Addition and Substance Abuse at Columbia University. (1999, January). No safe haven: Children of substance abusing parents. New York: Author.
25. National Drug Court Institute. (1999, May). Family drug courts: An alternative approach to processing child abuse & neglect cases. Alexandria, VA: Author.
26. Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project. (2003, November). Summary of drug court activity by state and county: Juvenile family drug courts. Washington, DC: American University.
27. SPSS. (2002). SPSS release 11.5 for Windows. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 830-838.
30. Tyler, T. R. (1998). Trust and democratic governance. In V. Braithwaite & M. Levi (Eds.), Trust in governance (pp. 269-294). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychological Press.
32. Tyler, T. R., & Degoey, P. (1996). Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 331-356). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
33. Tyler, T. R., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Whither trust? In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Williamson, O. E. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 34, 453-502.
35. Winick, B. J., & Wexler, D. B. (2003). Introduction. In B. J. Winick & D. B. Wexler (Eds.), Judging in a therapeutic key: Therapeutic jurisprudence and the courts (pp. 3-10). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
36. Young, N. K. (2003, January). Findings from the Retrospective Phase Family Drug Court National Cross-Site Evaluation. Presented at the National Association of Drug Court Professionals 4th Annual Conference in Washington, DC.
37. Young, N. K., Gardner, S. L., & Dennis, K. (1998). Responding to alcohol and other drug problems in child welfare: Weaving together practice and policy. Washington, DC: CWLA Press.