Learning the trade a social apprenticeship model for gaining writing expertise

Written Communication

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 185-223

  Beaufort, Anne ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749853752     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088300017002002     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Anson, C. M., & Forsberg, L. L. (1990). Moving beyond the academic community: Transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication, 7,20-231.
2. Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (1983). Instructional scaffolding: Reading and writing as natural language activities. Language Arts, 60,16-175.
3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V.W. McGee, Trans; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. Bartholomae, D. (1985). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), Wlien a writer can't write (pp. 134-165). New York: Guilford.
5. Bazerman, C. (1982). Scientific writing as a social act. In P. Anderson (Ed.), New essays in technical and scientic communication (pp. 156-184). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
6. Bazerman, C., & Paradis, J. (Eds.). (1991). Textual dynamics oftlie professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7. Beaufort, A. (1997). Operationalizing the concept of discourse community: A case study of one institutional site of composing. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 48-529.
8. Beaufort, A. (1999). Writing in tlie real world: Making the transition from school to work. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). Tlte psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication, 10,47-509.
11. Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
12. Bleich, D. (1998). Know and tell: A writing pedagogy of disclosure, genre, and membership. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
13. Brandt, D. (1990). Literacy as involvement: Tlie acts ofivriters, readers, and texts. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
14. Broadhead, G. J., & Freed, R. C. (1986). Tlie variables of composition: Process andproduct in a business setting. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
15. Brodkey, L. (1987). Academic writing as social practice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
16. Brown, R. L., & Herndl, C. G. (1986). An ethnographic study of corporate writing: Job status as reflected in written text. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives (pp. 11-28). London: Frances Pinter.
17. Carter, M. (1990). The idea of expertise: An exploration of cognitive and social dimensions of writing. College Composition and Communication, 41,26-286.
18. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in tionor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. deGroot, A. D. (1965). Tliought and choice in chess. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
20. Devitt, A. J. (1991). Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies ofwriting in professional communities (pp. -357). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
21. DiPardo, A. (1994). Stimulated recall in research on writing: An antidote to "I don't know, it was fine." In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology (pp. -181). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Doheny-Farina, S. (1986). Writing in an emerging organization. Written Communication, 3,15-185.
23. Doheny-Farina, S. (1989). A case study of one adult writing in academic and nonacademic discourse communities. In C. B. Matalene (Ed.), Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work (pp. 17-42). New York: Random House.
24. Dyson, A. (1988). Unintentional helping in the primary grades: Writing in the children's world. In B. A. Rafoth & D. L. Rubin (Eds.), Tlte social construction of writ ten communication (pp. 218-248). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Dyson, A. H. (1993). Social worlds of children learning to write in an urban primary school. New York: Teachers College Press.
26. Elbow, P. (1981). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Elbow, P. (1991). Reflections on academic discourse: How it rela tes to freshmen and colleagues. College English, 53,13-155.
28. Faigley, L. (1985). Nonacademic writing: The social perspective. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 231-248). New York: Guilford.
29. Florio, S., & Clark, C. M. (1982). The functions of writing in an elementary classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 16,11-130.
30. Flower, L. (1989). Rhetorical problem solving: Cognition and professional writing. In M. Kogen (Ed.), Writing in the business professions (pp. 3-36). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English and the Association for Business Communication.
31. Flower, L. (1994). The construction of negotiated meaning: A social cognitive theoryofwriting. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
32. Fowler, A. (1982). Kinds of literature: An introduction to the theory of genres and modes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Freedman, A. (1987). Development in story writing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 8, 15-170.
34. Freedman, A. (1993). Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English, 27,22-251.
35. Freedman, A., Adam, C., & Smart, G. (1994). Wearing suits to class: Simulating genres and simulations as genre. Written Communication, 11,19-226.
36. Geisler, C. (1994). Academic literacy and tlie nature of expertise: Reading, writing and knowing in academic philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Gott, S. P., Hall, E. P., Pokorny, R A., Dibble, E., & Glaser, R (1993). A naturalistic study of transfer Adaptive expertise in technical domains. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition,and instruction (pp. 258-288). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
38. Gunnarsson, B. L. (1997). The writing process from a sociolinguistic viewpoint. Written Communication, 14,13-188.
39. Heath, S. B. (1981). Toward an ethnohistory of writing in American education. In M. F. Whiteman (Ed.), Writing: The nature, development and teaching of written communication: Vol. 1. Variation in writing: Functional and linguistic-cultural differences (pp. 25-45). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Heath, S. B. (1982a). Ethnography and education: Defining the essentials. In P. Gilmore & A. A. Glathorn (Eds.), Children in and out of school (pp. 33-55). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
41. Heath, S. B. (1982b). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society, 11,49-76.
42. Heath, S. B., & Branscombe, A. (1985). "Intelligent writing" in an audience community: Teacher, students, and researcher. In S. W. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language (pp. 3-31). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
43. Hill, A., & Boone, B. (1982). IfMaslow taught writing: A way to look at motivation in the composition classroom. Berkeley: University of California, National Writing Project.
44. Hull, G. A. (1989). Research on writing: Building a cognitive and social understanding of composing. In L. B. Resnick & L. Klopfer (Eds.), Toward tlie thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 104-128). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
45. Jacob, E. (1997). Context and cognition: Implications for educational innovators and anthropologists. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 28,3-21.
46. Johns, L. C. (1989). The file cabinet has a sex life: Insights of a professional writing consultant. In C. B. Matalene (Ed.), Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work (pp. 153-187). New York: Random House.
47. Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A theory of discourse: The aims of discourse. New York: Norton.
48. Knoblauch, C. H. (1989). The teaching and practice of "professional writing." In M. Kogen (Ed.), Writing in the business professions (pp. 246-258). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English and Association for Business Communication.
49. Langer, J. A. (1985). Children's sense of genre: A study of performance on parallel reading and writing tasks. Written Communication, 2,15-187.
50. Larson,J. (1999). Analyzing participation frameworks in kindergarten writing activity: The role of overhearer in learning to write. Written Communication, 16,22-257.
51. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: Tlie construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
54. Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67-94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56. Lovitt, C. R., & Young, A. (1997). Rethinking genre in the first-year composition course: Helping student writers get things done. Profession 1997, pp. 113-125.
57. Lutz, J. A. (1989). Writers in organizations and how they learn the image: Theory, research, and implications. In C. B. Matalene (Ed.), Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work (pp.113-135). New York: Random House.
58. Macrorie, K. (1985). Telling writing. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
59. McCarthy, L. P. (1987). A stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. Research in tlie Teaching of English, 21,23-265.
60. Mclsaac, C, & Aschauer, M. A. (1990). Proposal writing at Atherton Jordan, Inc. Management Communication Quarterly, 3,52-560.
61. Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70,15-167.
62. Moffett, J. (1983). Teaching the universe of discourse. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
63. Myers, G. (1985). The social construction of two biologists' proposals. Written Communication, 2,21-245.
64. Nelson, J. (1995). Reading classrooms as text: Exploring student writers' interpretive practices. College Composition and Communication, 46,41-429.
65. Newkirk, T. (1997). The writing conference as performance. Research in the Teaching of English, 29,19-215.
66. Nystrand, M. (1990). Sharing \vords: The effects of readers on developing writers. Written Communication, 7,13-24.
67. Odell, L., Goswami, D., Herrington, A., & Quick, D. (1983). Studying writing in non-
68. - academic settings. In P. B. Anderson, R. J. Brockman, & C. R. Miller (Eds.), New essays in technical and scientific communication: Research, theory, practice (Vol. 2, pp. 17-40). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
69. Paradis, J., Dobrin, D., & Miller, R. (1985). Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the writing environment of an R&D organization. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp.281-307). New York: Guilford.
70. Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989a). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researclier, 18,16-25.
71. Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989b). Teaching for transfer. Educational Leadership, 46, 22-32.
72. Petraglia, J. (Ed.). (1995). Reconceiving writing, rethinking writing instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
73. Porter, J. E. (1992). Audience and rhetoric: An arcluieological composition of the discourse community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
74. Prior, P. (1994). Response, revision, disciplinarity: A microhistory of a dissertation prospectus in sociology. Written Communication, 11,48-533.
75. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16,13-20.
76. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1,20-229.
77. Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14,50-554.
78. Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1987). Skill may not be enough: The role of mindfulness in learning and transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 11,62-637.
79. Sanjek, R. (Ed.). (1990). Fieldnotes: The makings of anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
80. Schryer, C. F. (1993). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10,20-234.
81. Smagorinsky, P., &: Smith, M. W. (1992). The nature of knowledge in composition and literary understanding: The question of specificity. Review of Educational Research, 62,27-305.
82. Sperling, M. (1990). I want to talk to each of you: Collaboration and the teacher-student writing conference. Research in the Teacliing of English, 24,27-321.
83. Sperling, M. (1995). Uncovering the role of role in writing and learning to write: One day in an inner-city classroom. Written Communication, 12,93-133.
84. Sperling, M., & Freedman, S. W. (1987). A good girl writes like a good girl. Written Communication, 4,34-169.
85. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
86. Todorov, T. (1976). The origin of genres. New Literary History, 8,15-170.
87. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
88. VValvrood, B. E., & McCarthy, L. P. (1990). Thinking and writing in college: A naturalistic study of students in four disciplines. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
89. Woolever, K. R. (1989). Coming to terms with different standards of excellence for written communication. In C. B. Matalene (Ed.), Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work (pp. 3-16). New York: Random House.