Teachers' conceptions of assessment: Validation of an abridged version

Psychological Reports

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 166-170

  Brown, Gavin T L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; EDUCATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNIVERSITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ATTITUDE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FACULTY; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33749840530     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PR0.99.1.166-170     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. ARBUCKLE, J. L. (2003) AMOS (Version 5). Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corp. [computer software]
2. BROWN, G. T. L. (2002) Teachers' conceptions of assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Auckland: Univer. of Auckland.
3. BROWN, G. T. L. (2004a) Teachers' conceptions of assessment: implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Policy, Principles and Practice, 11, 305-322.
4. BROWN, G. T. L. (2004b) Measuring attitude with positively packed self-report ratings: comparison of agreement and frequency scales. Psychological Reports, 94, 1015-1024.
5. BROWNE, M. W., & CUDEK, R. (1989) Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24. 445-455.
6. BROWN, M. W., & CUDEK, R. (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit, In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.). Testing, structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Pp. 136-162.
7. BYRNE, B. M. (2001) Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. CHOU, C-P., & BENTLER, P. M. (1995) Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 37-55.
9. GABLE, R. K., & WOLF, M. B. (1993) Instrument development in the affective domain: measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings. (2nd ed.) Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
10. HOYLE, R. H. (1995) The structural equation modeling approach: basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 1-15.
11. HOYLE, R. H., & DUVALL, J. L. (2004) Determining the number of factors in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methodology for social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 301-315.
12. KLEM, L. (2000) Structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.). Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: APA. Pp. 227-260.
13. MACCALLUM, R. C. (1995) Model specification: procedures, strategies, and related issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, Pp. 16-36.
14. STATE OF QUEENSLAND. (2004) The New Basics Research Report, Brisbane, Qld., Australia: Department of Education and the Arts, June.
15. THOMPSON, B. (2000) Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: APA. Pp. 261-283.