Strong systematicity in sentence processing by an echo state network

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4131 LNCS - I, Issue , 2006, Pages 505-514

  Frank, Stefan L ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; LINGUISTICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS;

ECHO STATE NETWORK; LINGUISTIC BEHAVIOR; SENTENCE PROCESSING;

TEXT PROCESSING;

EID: 33749832400     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11840817_53     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Fodor, J.A., Pylyshyn, Z.W.: Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis. Cognition 28 (1988) 3-71
2. Chalmers, D.J.: Connectionism and compositionality: why Fodor and Pylyshyn were wrong. Philosophical Psychology 6(3) (1993) 305-319
3. Hadley, R.F.: Systematicity in connectionist language learning. Mind & Language 9(3) (1994) 247-272
4. Niklasson, L.F., Van Gelder, T.: On being systematically connectionist. Mind & Language 9 (1994) 288-302
5. Fodor, J.A., McLaughlin, B.: Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: Why Smolensky's solution does not work. Cognition 35 (1990) 183-204
6. Aizawa, K.: The systematicity arguments. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers (2003)
7. Christiansen, M.H., Chater, N.: Generalization and connectionist language learning. Mind & Language 9(3) (1994) 273-287
8. Hadley, R.F., Rotaru-Varga, A., Arnold, D.V., Cardei, V.O.: Syntactic systematicity arising from semantic predictions in a Hebbian-competetive network. Connection Science 13(1) (2001) 73-94
9. Bodén, M.: Generalization by symbolic abstraction in cascaded recurrent networks. Neurocomputing 57 (2004) 87-104
10. Elman, J.L.: Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14 (1990) 179-211
11. Jaeger, H.: Adaptive nonlinear system identification with echo state networks. In Becker, S., Thrun, S., Obermayer, K., eds.: Advances in neural information processing systems. Volume 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (2003)
12. Jaeger, H., Haas, H.: Harnessing nonlinearity: predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication. Science 304 (2004) 78-80
13. Frank, S.L.: Learn more by training less: systematicity in sentence processing by recurrent networks. Connection Science (in press)
14. Van der Velde, F., Van der Voort van der Kleij, G.T., De Kamps, M.: Lack of combinatorial productivity in language processing with simple recurrent networks. Connection Science 16(1) (2004) 21-46
15. Hadley, R.F.: Systematicity revisited: reply to Christiansen and Chater and Niklasson and van Gelder. Mind & Language 9(4) (1994) 431-444
16. Hadley, R.F.: On the proper treatment of semantic systematicity. 14 (2004) 145-172
17. Frank, S.L., Haselager, W.F.G.: Robust semantic systematicity and distributed representations in a connectionist model of sentence comprehension. In Miyake, N., Sun, R., eds.: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum (in press)