Testing the fraud detection ability of different user profiles by means of FF-NN classifiers

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4132 LNCS - II, Issue , 2006, Pages 872-883

  Hilas, Constantinos S ^a   Sahalos, John N ^b  

^a TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SERRES   (Greece)

^b ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CRIME; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; SECURITY OF DATA;

TELECOMMUNICATIONS FRAUDS; USER PROFILES;

FEEDFORWARD NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 33749825000     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11840930_91     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Gosset, P. and Hyland, M.: Classification, detection and prosecution of fraud in mobile networks. Proceedings of ACTS Mobile Summit, Sorrento Italy (1999)
2. Bolton, R. J. and Hand, D. J.: Statistical fraud detection: a review. Statistical Science, vol. 17, no. 3. (2002) 235-255
3. ACTS ACo95, project ASPeCT: Legal aspects of fraud detection. AC095/KUL/W26/DS/P/25/2. (1998)
4. Hilas, C. S. and Sahalos, J. N.: User profiling for fraud detection in telecommunications networks. Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Technology and Automation - ICTA '05, Thessaloniki Greece (2005) 382-387
5. Moreau Y., Preneel B., Burge P., Shawe-Taylor J., Stoermann C., Cooke C.: Novel Techniques for Fraud Detection in Mobile Telecommunication Networks. ACTS Mobile Summit. Granada Spain (1997)
6. Buschkes, R., Kesdogan, D., and Reichl, P.: How to increase security in Mobile Networks by Anomaly Detection. Proc. of the 14th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference - ACS AC '98. (1998) 8
7. Rosset, S., Murad, U., Neumann, E., Idan, Y., and Pinkas G.: Discovery of fraud rules for telecommunications - challenges and solutions. Proc. of ACM SIGKDD-99. ACM Press, San Diego, CA, USA (1999) 409-413
8. Adomavicious, G. and Tuzhilin, Al.: User profiling in Personalization Applications through Rule Discovery and Validation. Proc. of ACM SIGKDD-99. ACM Press, San Diego, CA, USA (1999) 377 - 381
9. Fawcett, T. and Provost, F.: Adaptive Fraud Detection. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1, Kluwer (1997) 291 - 316
10. Oh, S. H. and Lee, W. S.: An anomaly intrusion detection method by clustering normal user behavior. Computers & Security, Vol. 22, No. 7. (2003) 596-612
11. Cox, K. C., Eick, S. G., Wills, G. J. and Brachman R. J.: Visual data mining: Recognizing telephone calling fraud. J. Data Mining and Knowledge Discover, 1 (2). (1997) 225-231
12. Taniguchi, M., Haft, M., Hollmen, J. and Tresp V.: Fraud detection in communication networks using neural and probabilistic methods. Proc. of the 1998 IEEE Int. Conf. in Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. 2. (1998) 1241-1244
13. Manikopoulos, C. and Papavassilliou, S.: Network Intrusion and Fault Detection: A Statistical Anomaly Approach. IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 40, 10. (2002) 76-82
14. Hollmen, J. and Tresp, V.: Call-based fraud detection in mobile communication networks using a hierarchical regime switching model. Proc. of the 1998 Conf. on Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems II, MIT Press, (1999), 889-895
15. Phua, C., Alahakoon, D. and Lee, V.: Minority Report in Fraud Detection: Classification of Skewed Data. ACM SIGKDD Explorations - Special Issue on Imbalanced Data Sets, vol. 6(1). (2004) 50-58
16. Fawcett, T. and Phua, C.: Fraud Detection Bibliography, Accessed From: http://liinwww.ira.uka.de/bibliography/Ai/fraud.detection.html. (2005)
17. Hinde, S. F.: Call Record Analysis. Making Life Easier - Network Design and Management Tools (Digest No: 1996/217), IEE Colloquium on, (1996) 8/1 - 8/4
18. nd ed. Chapman & Hall. (1994)
19. Lin, Chin-Teng, and Lee, George C. S.: Neural-Fuzzy Systems: a neuro fuzzy synergism to intelligent systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. (1996)
20. Riedmiller, M., and H. Braun.: A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: The RPROP algorithm. Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks, Vol.1. (1993) 586-591
21. Downey, T. J., Meyer, D. J., Price R. K., and Spitznagel E. L.: Using the receiver operating characteristic to asses the performance of neural classifiers. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks, Vol. 5. (1999) 3642 -3646
22. Provost, F., Fawcett, T. and Kohavi, R.: The case against accuracy estimation for comparing induction algorithms. Proc of the Fifteenth Int. Conf. on Machine Learning. San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann (1998) 43-48
23. Kajitani, Yoshio, Hipel, Keith W., McLeod Ian A.: Forecasting nonlinear time series with feed-forward neural networks: a case study of Canadian lynx data. Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 24 (2). (2005) 105-117