The president's committee on administrative management: The untold story and the federalist connection

Administration and Society

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 522-555

  Newbold, Stephanie P ^a   Terry, Larry D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Executive branch management; President's Committee on Administrative Management (1937); Unity of the executive

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749817396     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: 15523039     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009539970603800503     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams, G. B. (1992). Enthralled with modernity: The historical context of knowledge and theory development in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52, 363-373.
2. Aranson, P., Gellhorn, E., & Robinson, G. O. (1982). A theory of legislative delegation. Cornell Law Review, 68, 1-67.
3. Brownlow, L., Merriam, C., & Gulick, L. (1937). Administrative management in the government of the United States. Washington, DC: President's Committee on Administrative Management.
4. Buck, A. E., & Mansfield, H. C. (1937). Fiscal management in the national government. Washington, DC: President's Committee on Administrative Management.
5. Caldwell, L. K. (1955). The relevance of administrative history. Revue Internationale des Sciences Administratives, 21, 453-466.
6. Congressional Quarterly Press. (2006). The politics of the administrative process, 3rd edition. Retrieved from http://www.cqpress.com/product/Politics- of-the-Administrative-3.html
7. Cooke, J. E. (Ed.). (1989). The Federalist. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
8. Cushman, R. E. (1937). The independent regulatory commissions. Washington, DC: President's Committee on Administrative Management.
9. Denhardt, R. (1995). Public administration: An action orientation (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
10. Fesler, J. W. (1987). The Brownlow Committee fifty years later. Public Administration Review, 47, 291-296.
11. Gellhorn, E. (1987). Returning to first principles. American University Law Review, 60, 495-505.
12. Goodsell, C. T. (2004). The case for bureaucracy: A public administration polemic. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
13. Hart, J., & Witte, E. E. (1937). The exercise of rule-making power and the preparation of proposed legislative measures by administrative departments. Washington, DC: President's Committee on Administrative Management.
14. In memoriam: James Fesler. (2005, May 6). Yale Bulletin and Calendar. Retrieved May 6, 2006, from http://www.yale.edu/opa/v33.n28/story30.html
15. Karl, B. (1963). Executive reorganization and reform in the New Deal: The genesis of administrative management, 1900-1939. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Light, P. (1995). Thickening government: Federal hierarchy and the diffusion of accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17. Lowi, T. (1993). Two roads to serfdom: Liberalism, conservatism, and administrative power. In S. L. Elkins & K. E. Soltan (Eds.), A new constitutionalism: Designing political institutions for a good society (pp. 149-173). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Lynn, L. E. (2001). The myth of the bureaucratic paradigm: What traditional public administration really stood for. Public Administration Review, 61, 144-160.
19. MacMahon, A., Fesler, J. W., & Emmerich, H. (1937). Problems of administrative management. Washington, DC: President's Committee on Administrative Management.
20. Rabkin, J. (1995, Spring). Cornell University College of Arts and Sciences newsletter. Retrieved Spring 2005 from http://www.arts.cornell.edu/ newsletr/spring95/rabkin.htm
21. Reeves, F. W., & David, P. T. (1937). Personnel administration in the federal service. Washington, DC: President's Committee on Administrative Management.
22. Rohr, J. A. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
23. Rosenbloom, D., & Kravchuk, R. S. (2002). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
24. Sargentich, T. (1987). The delegation debate and compelling ideals of the administrative process. American University Law Review, 36, 419-442.
25. Stillman, R. (1988). Public administration: Concepts and cases (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26. Stillman, R. (1991). Preface to public administration: A search for themes and directions. New York: St. Martin's.
27. Thompson, K. W. (1995). Diplomacy, administration, and policy: The ideas and careers of Nolting, Mosher, and David. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
28. Waldo, D. (1948). The administrative state. New York: Ronald Press.
29. White, L. D. (1948). The Federalists: A study in administrative history. New York: Macmillan.
30. White, L. D. (1951). The Jeffersonians: A study in administrative history, 1801-1829. New York: Macmillan.
31. White, L. D. (1954). The Jacksonians: A study in administrative history, 1829-1861. New York: Macmillan.
32. White, L. D. (1958). The Republican era: A study in administrative history, 1869-1901. New York: Macmillan.
33. Willoughby, W. F. (1927). Principles of public administration. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.