Why don’t organizations pay attention to (and use) findings from the science of training?

Human Resource Development Quarterly

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 487-491

  Salas, Eduardo ^a   Kosarzycki, Mary P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749685599     PISSN: 10448004     EISSN: 15321096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.1081     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Galvin, T. (2001, October). Industry report 2001.
2. Training. Available on-line: http://209.11.43.229/training/images/pdf/2001_industry_report.pdf.
3. Goldstein, I. L. (1980). Training in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 229–272.
4. Kosarzycki, M. P., Salas, E., DeRouin, R., & Fiore, S. M. (2003). Distance learning in organizations: A review and assessment of future needs. In D. Stone (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research (pp. 69–98). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
5. Latham, G. P. (1988). Human resource training and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 545–582.
6. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471–499.
7. Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Rhodenizer, L., & Bowers, C. A. (1999). Training in organizations: Myths, misconceptions, and mistaken assumptions. Personnel and Human Resources Management, 17, 123–161.
8. Tannenbaum, S. I., & Yukl, G. (1992). Training and development in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 399–441.
9. Wexley, K. N. (1984). Personnel training. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 519–551.