Modelling multi-modal learning in a hawkmoth

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4095 LNAI, Issue , 2006, Pages 422-433

  Balkenius, Anna ^a,b   Kelber, Almut ^b   Balkenius, Christian ^c  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY COGNITIVE SCIENCE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MODAL ANALYSIS;

LEARNING MODELS; MULTI-MODAL LEARNING; RESCORLA-WAGNER MODEL;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33749673446     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11840541_35     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. S. Andersson. Foraging responses in the butterflies Inachis io, Aglais urticae (nymphalidae), and Gonepteryx rhamni (pieridae) to floral scents. J. Chem. Ecol. 13:1-11, 2003.
2. A Balkenius and A. Kelber. Colour constancy in diurnal and nocturnal hawkmoths. J. Exp. Biol., 207:3307-3316, 2004.
3. A. Balkenius and A. Kelber. Colour preferences influence odour learning in the hawkmoth, Macroglossum stellatarum. Naturwissenschaften, pages 1-4, 2006.
4. A. Balkenius, A. Kelber, and C. Balkenius. A model of selection between stimulus and place strategy in a hawkmoth. Adaptive Behavior, 12(1):21-35, 2004.
5. A. Balkenius, W. Rosén, and A. Kelber. The relative importance of olfaction and vision in a diurnal and a nocturnal hawkmoth. Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 192(4):431-437, 2006.
6. N. B. M. Brantjes. Sensory responses to flowers in night-flying moths. In A. J. Richards, editor, The pollinaton of flowers by insects, pages 13-19. The Dorset Press, Dorchester, 1978.
7. P. A. Couvillon, L. Arakaki, and M. E. Bitterman. Intramodal blocking in honeybees. Anim. Learn. Behav., 25:277-282, 1997.
8. P. A. Couvillon, A. C. Campos, T. D. Bass, and M. E. Bitterman. Intermodal blocking in honeybees. Exp. Psychol. Soc., 54B:369-381, 2001.
9. P. A. Couvillon, E. T. Mateo, and M. E. Bitterman. Reward and learning in honeybees: Analysis of an overshadowing effect. Anim. Learn. Behav., 24:19-27, 1996.
10. J. P. Cunningham, C. J. Moore, M. P. Zalucki, and S. A. West. Learning, odour preference and flower foraging in moths. J. Exp. Biol., 207:87-94, 2004.
11. E. S. Funayama, P. A. Couvillon, and M. E. Bitterman. Compound conditioning in honeybees: Blocking tests of the independence assumption. Anim. Learn. Behav., 23:429-437, 1995.
12. R. C. Gallistel. The organization of learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
13. B. Gerber and J. Ullrich. No evidence for olfactory blocking in honeybee classical conditioning. J. Exp. Biol., 202:1839-1854, 1999.
14. M. Giurfa, J. Núñez, and W. Backhaus. Odour and colour information in the foraging choice behaviour of the honeybee. J. Comp. Physiol. A., 175:773-779, 1994.
15. M. Giurfa, J. Núñez, L. Chittka, and R. Menzel. Colour preferences of flower-naive honeybees. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 177:247-259, 1995.
16. C. M. Herrera. Activity pattern and thermal biology of a day-flying hawkmoth (Macroglossum stellatarum) under mediterranean summer conditions. Ecol. Entomol., 17:52-56, 1992.
17. L. J. Kamin. Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell and R. M. Church, editors. Punishment and Aversive Behavior. pages 279-296. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1969.
18. A. Kelber. Innate preferences for flower features in the hawkmoth Macroglossum stellatarum. J. Exp. Biol., 200:826-835, 1997.
19. A. Kelber and U. Hénique. Trichromatic colour vision in the hummingbird hawkmoth, Macroglossum stellatarum. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 184:535-541, 1999.
20. A. Kelber, M. Vorobyev, and D. Osorio. Animal colour vision - behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biol. Rev., 78:81-118, 2003.
21. J. Kunze and A. Gumbert. The combined effect of color and odor on flower choice behavior of bumble bees in flower mimicry systems. Behav. Ecol., 12:447-456, 2001.
22. R. C. Luo and M. G. Kay. Data fusion and sensor integration: state-of-the-art 1990s. In M. A. Abidi and R. C. Gonzalez, editors, Data Fusion in Robotics and Machine Intelligence. Academic Press, Boston, 1992.
23. N. J. Mackintosh. The Physiology of Animal Learning. Academic Press, London, 1974.
24. R. Menzel. Untersuchungen zum erlernen von Spektralfarben durch die honigbiene (Apis mellifica). Z. t vergl. Physiol., 56:25-37, 1967.
25. I. P. Pavlov. Conditioned Reflexes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1927.
26. C. Pelz, B. Gerber, and R. Menzel. Odorant intensity as a determinant for olfactory conditioning in honeybees: roles in discrimination, overshadowing and memory consolidation. J. Exp. Biol., 200:837-847, 1997.
27. M. Pfaff and A. Kelber. Ein vielseitiger Futterspender für anthophile Insekten. Entomol. Zt., 113:360-361, 2003.
28. R. A. Raguso and M. A. Willis. Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naive hawkmoths, Manduca sexta. Anim. Behav., 64:685-695, 2002.
29. C. Rowe. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Anim. Behav., 58(921-931), 1999.
30. M. V. Srinivasan, S. W. Zhang, and H. Zhu. Honeybees links sight to smell. Nature, 396:637-638, 1998.
31. K. von Frisch. Der Farbensinn und Formensinn der Biene. Zool. Jb. Abt. Zool. Physiol., 15:193-260, 1914.
32. K. von Frisch. Über den Geruchssinn der Bienen und seine blütenbiologische Bedeutung. Zool. Jb. Abt. Zool. Physiol., 37:2-238, 1919.
33. M. Weiss. Innate colour preferences and flexible colour learning in the pipevine swallowtail. Anim. Behav., 53:1043-1052, 1997.
34. M. Weiss. Vision and learning in some neglected pollinators: beetles, flies, moths, and butterflies. In L. Chittka and J. D. Thomson, editors, Cognitive Ecology of Pollination, pages 171-190. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
35. T. R. Zentall and D. A. Riley. Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. J. gen. Psychol., 127:45-66, 2000.