GearBi: Towards an online arbitration environment based on the design principles simplicity, awareness, orientation, and timeliness

Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 297-321

  Vreeswijk, Gerard A W ^a   Lodder, Arno R ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dispute resolution; Online arbitration; Systems design; Usability engineering

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; DISPUTE RESOLUTION; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS DISPUTES; ONLINE ARBITRATION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 33749661717     PISSN: 09248463     EISSN: 15728382     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10506-006-9015-z     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Blanchard R. E. (1993). Situation awareness-transition from theory to practice. In: Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society: 32nd Annual Meeting. Santa Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Monica, CA, pp. 39-42.
2. Carroll, J. M., Neale, D. C., Isenhour, P. L., Rosson, M. B. and McCrickard, D. S. (2003). Notification and Awareness: Synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58(5): 605-632, Elsevier.
3. Chi, E. H. P. and Pirolli, J. Pitkow (2000). The scent of a site: a system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a Web site, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 161-168, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands.
4. Dufner, D., Kwon, O. and Hadidi, R. (1999). Web-CCAT: A collaborative learning environment for geographically distributed information technology students and working professionals. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 12, March 1999.
5. E-Arbitration-T (2002). E-Arbitration-T Project: An Alternative Dispute Resolution for SMEs. World Arbitration Newsletter, Number 2, June 2002. Available at http://www.e-global.es/arbitration.
6. Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems, Human Factors 37(1): 32-64.
7. Grover, A. (2002). More Security is Needed For Online ADR Applications, 20 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 135.
8. Gutwin, C. and Greenberg S. (1998). Effects of awareness support on groupware usability, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 511-518, April 18-23, 1998, Los Angeles, California, United States.
9. Hill, R. (1999), Online arbitration: Issues and Solutions, Arbitration International, April 1999 issue, 〈http://www.umass.edu/dispute/hill. htm〉.
10. Hunt, A. and Thomas, D. (2000). The Pragmatic. Programmer. Addison-Wesley.
11. Katsh, E. and Rifkin, J. (2001). Online Dispute Resolution: Conflict Resolution in Cyberspace. Jossey-Bass 2001: San Francisco.
12. Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Schultz, T. (2004). Online Dispute Resolution: Challenges for Contemporary Justice. Kluwer Law International: The Hague.
13. Lodder, A. R. and Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (2004). 'Online Arbitration Services at a Turning Point: An Appraisal', ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Special Supplement 'Using Technology to Resolve Business Dispute, pp. 35-42.
14. Lodder, A. R. and Huygen, P. E. M. (2001). 'eADR: A Simple Tool to Structure the Information Exchange Between Parties in Online Alternative Dispute Resolution'. In Verheij, B. et al. (eds.), JURIX 2001, IOS Press, pp. 117-129.
15. Lodder, A. R. (1999). DiaLaw, On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht/Boston/London.
16. Lodder, A. R. (2004). 'Information Security & Online Dispute Resolution', Proceedings of Symposium Putting ICT into dispute resolution practice, London, September 6, 2004.
17. Nakano, R. (2001). Web Content Management: A Collaborative Approach. Addison-Wesley: Boston.
18. Online Arbitration: What Technology can do for Arbitral Institutions. Introductory document for a January 20th 2003 one-day seminar organized by the E-Arbitration-T consortium.
19. Oskamp, A., Lodder, A. R. and Apistola, M. (eds.) (2004). IT Support of the Judiciary: Australia, Singapore, Venezuela, Norway, The Netherlands and Italy, TMC Asser Press/Cambridge University Press.
20. Philippe, M. (2004). 'NetCase: A New ICC Arbitration Facility', ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Special Supplement 'Using Technology to Resolve Business Dispute', pp. 53-58.
21. Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp, H. (2002). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY.
22. Rule, C. (2002). Online Dispute Resolution for Businesses. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco Ca.
23. Schäfer, E. (2003). 'Videoconferencing in arbitration', ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 1, Spring, pp. 35-45.
24. Schäfer, E. (2004). 'IT in Arbitration: The Work of the ICC Task force', ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Special Supplement 'Using Technology to Resolve Business Dispute, pp. 59-62.
25. The Standards, Operating Standards for Using IT in International Arbitration (2004). ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, Special Supplement 'Using Technology to Resolve Business Dispute, pp. 75-98.
26. Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (1993). Studies in Defeasible Argumentation. PhD thesis, Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
27. Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (2003). 'A Simple Scheme to Structure and Process the Information of Parties in Online Forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution', ADR Online Monthly, October 2003.
28. Wahab, M. (2004). The Global Information Society and Online Dispute Resolution: A New Dawn for Dispute Resolution, Journal of International Arbitration 21(2): 143-168.
29. Yu, H. and Nasir, M. (2003). Can Online Arbitration Exist Within the Traditional Arbitration Framework, Journal of International Arbitration 20(5): 455-473.