Seeing the forest for the trees: A rebuttal

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 111-114

  Manne, Sharon L ^a,c   Andrykowski, Michael A ^b  

^a FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^c Psycho Oncology Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DISTRESS SYNDROME; EFFECT SIZE; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

COGNITIVE THERAPY; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 33749643132     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15324796abm3202_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Manne SL, Andrykowski M: Are psychological interventions effective and accepted by cancer patients? II. Using empirically supported therapy guidelines to decide. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2006, 32:98-103. [this issue]
2. Lepore SJ, Coyne JC: Psychological interventions for distress in cancer patients: A review of reviews. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2006, 32:85-92. [this issue]
3. Newell SA, Sanson-Fisher RW, Savolainen NJ: Systematic review of psychological therapies for cancer patients: Overview and recommendations for future research. Journal or the National Cancer Institute. 2002, 94:558-584.
4. Andrykowski M, Manne SL: Are psychological interventions effective and accepted by cancer patients? I. Standards and levels of evidence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2006, 32:93-97. [this issue]
5. Chambless DL, Hollon SD: Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1998, 66:7-18.
6. Zakowski SG, Ramati A, Morton C, Johnson P, Flanigan R: Written emotional disclosure buffers the effects of social constraints on distress among cancer patients. Health Psychology. 2004, 23:555-563.
7. Coyne JC, Lepore SJ, Palmer SC: Efficacy of psychosocial interventions in cancer care: Evidence is weaker than it first looks. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2006, 32:104-110. [this issue]
8. Jacobsen PB, Donovan KA, Trask PC, et al.: Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients: A multicenter evaluation of the distress thermometer. Cancer. 2005, 103:1494-1502.
9. Manne S, Ostroff J, Winkel G, et al.: Couple-focused group intervention for women with early stage breast cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2005, 73:634-646.
10. Scott J, Halford K, Ward B: United we stand? The effects of a couple-coping intervention on adjustment to early stage breast or gynecological cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2004, 72:1122-1135.
11. Devine EC, Westlake SK: The effects of psychoeducational care provided to adults with cancer: Meta-analysis of 116 studies. Oncology Nursing Forum. 1995, 22:1369-1381.
12. Sheard T, Maguire P: The effect of psychological interventions on anxiety and depression in cancer patients: Results of two meta-analyses. British Journal of Cancer. 1999, 80:1170-1780.
13. Ropka ME, Spencer-Cisek P: PRISM: Priority Symptom Management Project Phase I. Assessment. Oncology Nursing Forum. 2001, 28:1585-1594.
14. Wampold BE: The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods, and Findings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 2001.
15. Wampold BE, Mondin GW, Moody M, et al.: A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, "all must have prizes." Psychological Bulletin. 1997, 122:203-215.
16. Baskin T: Establishing specificity in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis of structural equivalence of placebo controls. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2003, 71:973-979.
17. Wade W, Treat T, Stuart G: Transporting an empirically supported treatment for panic disorder to a service clinic setting: A benchmarking strategy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1998, 66:231-239.
18. Weersing V: Benchmarking the effectiveness of psychotherapy: Program evaluation as a component of evidence-based practice. Journal of the Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2005, 10:1058-1062.