Differences between women's and men's access to interventional cardiovascular procedures at public hospitals in Andalusia (Spain);Diferencias entre mujeres y varones en el acceso a procedimientos cardiovasculares intervencionistas en los hospitales públicos de Andalucía

Revista Espanola de Cardiologia

Volumn 59, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 785-793

  Aguado Romeo, María J ^a   Márquez Calderón, Soledad ^a   Buzón Barrera, María L ^a  

^a JUNTA DE ANDALUCÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Acute myocardial infarction; Coronary revascularization; Gender; Unstable angina

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CULTURAL FACTOR; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ASPECT; SPAIN; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS;

EID: 33749632321     PISSN: 03008932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13091882     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Gurwitz JH, Col NF, Avorn J. The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992;268:1417-22.
2. Ruiz MT, Ronda E. Atención sanitaria según el sexo de los pacientes. Med Clin (Barc). 1994;103:537-8.
3. Sans S, Puigdefábregas A, Paluzie G, Monterde D, Balaguer-Vintró I. Increasing trends of acute myocardial infarction in Spain: the MONICA-Catalonia Study. Eur Heart J. 2005; 26:505-15.
4. Wenger NK. Coronary heart disease: the female heart is vulnerable. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2003;46:199-229.
5. Lloyd-Jones DM, Larson MG, Beiser A, Levy D. Lifetime risk of developing coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1999;353:89-92.
6. Marrugat J, Sala J, Rolfs I. Posibles aplicaciones prácticas en Salud Pública de los resultados de los sistemas de monitorización de la cardiopatía isquémica. Monitorización epidemiológica de las enfermedades cardiovasculares en España y estrategias preventivas. Madrid: EMISA; 2005. p. 39-58.
7. Latour J, López-Camps V, Rodríguez-Serra M, Giner JS, Bonastre J, Rosado L. [Prognosis myocardial infarction in women. Effect of the therapeutic effort and the socioeconomic status.] Rev Esp Cardiol. 1992;45:560-5.
8. Raine RA, Black NA, Bowker TJ, Wood DA. Gender differences in the management and outcome of patients with acute coronary artery disease. J Epidemiol Com Health. 2002;56:791-7.
9. Guth AA, Hiotis K, Rockman C. Influence of gender on surgical outcomes: does gender really matter? J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 200:440-55.
10. Rohlfs I, García MM, Gavalda L, Medrano MJ, Juvinya D, Baltasar A, et al. Género y cardiopatía isquémica. Gac Sanit. 2004; 18:55-64.
11. Marrugat J, Gil M, Masiá R, Sala J, Elosúa R, Antón JM, et al, and REGICOR Investigators. Role of age and sex in short and long term mortalily anfeter a first Q wave myocardial infarction. J Epidemiol Com Health. 2001;55:487-93.
12. Red de investigación de Género y Salud (Página frontal en Internet). Granada: Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública [accedido 25 Nov 2005]. Disponible en: http://www.easp.es/redgenero/web /esp/agenda.asp
13. Boccia A, Damiani G, D'Errico MM, Farinaro E, Gregorio P, Nante N, et al. Age and sex related utilisation of cardiac procedures and interventions: a multicentric study in Italy. Intern J Cardiol. 2005;101:179-84.
14. Malenka DJ, Wennberg DE, Quinton HA, O'Rourke DJ, McGrath PD, Shubrooks SJ, et al. Gender-related changes in the practice and outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions in Northern New England from 1994 to 1999. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:2092-101.
15. Moreno R, Ortega A, Cantalapiedra JL, López DS, Delcán JL. Does a sex bias really exist in the management of women with coronary heart disease? Eur Heart J. 1999;20:600.
16. Aguilar MD, Lázaro P, Fitch K, Luengo S. Gender differences in clinical status at time of coronary revascularisation in Spain. J Epidemiol Com Health. 2002;56:555-9.
17. Librero J, Cuenca C, Peiró S. Comorbilidad e índice de Charlson. Aplicaciones en el CMBD. En: Quaderns de Saint Pública i Administració de Serveis de la Saint 18. Valencia: Escola Valenciana d'Estudis per la Saint; 2002.
18. Esplugas E, Alfonso F, Alonso JJ, Asín E, Elizaga J, Íñiguez A, et al. Guías de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología en cardiología intervencionista: angioplastia coronaría y otras técnicas. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2000;53:218-40.
19. Gersh BJ, Phil D, Frye RL. Methods of coronary revascularization-things may not be as they seem. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352:2235-7.
20. Rathore SS, Wang Y, Radford MJ, Ordin DL, Krumholz HM. Sex differences in cardiac catheterization after acute myocardial infarction: the role of procedure appropriateness. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:487-93.
21. Scirica BM, Moliterno DJ, Every NR, Anderson HV, Aguirre FV, Granger CB, et al. Differences between men and women in the management of unstable angina pectoris (The GUARANTEE Registry). The GUARANTEE Investigators. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84:1145-50.
22. Bodí V, Fácila F, Sanchís J, Llácer A, Ferrero JA, Chorro FJ. Diferencias entre sexos en pacientes con sospecha de síndrome coronario agudo sin elevatión del segmento ST. Implicaciones en el tratamiento intervencionista. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2003; 56:412-6.
23. Miller TD, Roger V, Hodge DO, Hopfenspirger MR, Baley KR, Gibbons RJ. Gender differences and temporal trends in clinical characteristics, stress test results and use of invasive procedures in patients undergoing evaluation for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:690-7.
24. García E. Intervencionismo en el contexto del infarto de miocardio. Conceptos actuales. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005;58:567-84.
25. Gibbons RJ, Grines CL. Acute PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: is later better than never? JAMA. 2005; 293:2930-2.
26. Koch CG, Khandwala F, Nussmeier N, Blackstone EH. Gender and outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting: a propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:2032-43.
27. Mosca L, Appel LJ, Benjamin EJ, Berra K, Chandra-Strobos N, Fabunmi RP, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention in women. Circulation. 2004;109:672-93.
28. Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, Camici PG, Colombo A, Hamm C, et al. Guías de práctica clínica sobre intervensionismo coronario percutáneo. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005;58:679-728.
29. Koch CG, Khandwala F, Nussmeier N, Blackstone EH. Gender profiling in coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:2044-51.
30. Keresztes PA, Merritt SL, Holm K, Penckofer S, Patel M. The coronary artery bypass experience: gender differences. Heart Lung. 2003;32:308-19.
31. Swahn E. The care of patients with ischaemic heart disease from a gender perspective. Eur Heart J. 1998;19:1758-65.
32. Álvarez-León E, Elosúa R, Zamora A, Aldasoro E, Galcerá J, Vanaclocha H, et al. Recursos hospitalarios y letalidad por infarto de miocardio. Estudio IBERICA. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2004;57:514-23.
33. Vaccarino V, Rathore SS, Wenger NK, Frederick PD, Abramson JL, Barron HV, et al. Sex and racial differences in the management of acute myocardial infarction, 1994 through 2002. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:671-82.