The space campaign space-power theory applied to counterspace operations

Air and Space Power Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 61-70

  Ziarnick, Brent D ^a  

^a USAF   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749623449     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. James E. Oberg, Space Power Theory (Colorado Springs, CO: US Air Force Academy, [1999]).
2. James E. Oberg, Space Power Theory Ibid., 10. [1999]
3. James E. Oberg, Space Power Theory Ibid., 44.
4. James E. Oberg, Space Power Theory Ibid. 44. Oberg includes laboratories as part of the technology element, but for simplicity's sake, this article considers them facilities.
5. James E. Oberg, Space Power Theory Ibid. 44 Ibid.
6. James E. Oberg, Space Power Theory Ibid., 47.
7. Stan Lehman, "Brazil's Space Dreams Are Now in Limbo," SPACE.com, 20 October 2003, http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/ brazil_future_031020.html.
8. Figure 1's graphical representation has no mathematical basis. It reflects only the author's opinion regarding die relative effectiveness of attacking the elements of space power.
9. I am heavily indebted to Colonel Warden and Maj Jay Billups, 34th Education Squadron, USAFA, for prouding me with the inspiration to adapt a similar ring concept to a space campaign.