Vigilance and error detection in an automated command and control environment

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 6, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Biros, David P ^a   Marett, Kent ^b   Langhals, Brent T ^c  

^a OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c USAF   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA MANIPULATION; INFORMATION WARFARE; VIGILANCE LEVELS;

DATA ACQUISITION; DATA REDUCTION; FINITE AUTOMATA; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; SECURITY OF DATA;

ERROR DETECTION;

EID: 33749617426     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2006.531     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Adams, J. A. Criticisms of vigilance research: A discussion. Human Factors, (1997), 29: p. 737-740.
2. Alberts, D. S. Defensive Information Warfare. National Defense University, Institute for National Strategic Studies, August 1996.
3. Balakrishnan, J. D. Measures and interpretations of vigilance performance: Evidence against the detection criterion. Human Factors, (1998), 40: p.601-623.
4. Biros, D., J. George, and R. Zmud. Inducing sensitivity to deception in order to improve decision making performance: A field study. MIS Quarterly, (2002), 26: p.119-144.
5. Blocher, E., R. Moffie and R. Zmud. Report format and task complexity: Interaction in risk judgments. Accounting Organizations and Society, (1986), 11: p.457-470.
6. Davies, D.R. and Parasuraman R. The Psychology of Vigilance, New York: Academic Press, 1982.
7. Dittmar, ML. and J. Warm. Sex differences in vigilance performance and perceived workload. Journal of General Psychology, (1993), 120: p.309-322.
8. Dwivedi, C. B. Induced arousal and orienting tasks as determinants of intentional recall. Journal of General Psychology, (1992), 119: p.265-277.
9. Gluckman, J.P. and J. Warm. Demand transitions and sustained attention. Journal of General Psychology, (1993), 120: p.323-337.
10. Hackley, S. and F. Valle-Inclan. Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, (1993), 11: p.321-329.
11. Hackley, S. and F. Valle-Inclan. Which stages of processing are speeded by a warning signal? Biological Psychology, (2003), 64(1-2), p. 27-45.
12. Klein BD, Goodhue DL, Davis GB. Can humans detect errors in data?: Impact of base rates, incentives, and goals. MIS Quarterly, (1997), 21(2): p. 169-94.
13. Jerison, H. Signal detection theory in the analysis of human vigilance. Human Factors, (1967), 9(3): p.285-288.
14. Jerison, H. Vigilance: A paradigm and other physiological speculations. Acta Physiologica, (1970), 33: p.367-380.
15. Jones, M. PC Reliability: Things Fall Apart. Excerpt from unpublished article, n. pag. http://www.pcworld.com/features/article.asp?aid=16808.
16. Mackworth, N. H. Some factors affecting vigilance. Advancements in Science, (1957), 53: 389-393.
17. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Mehabrian, A. Theory and evidence bearing on a scale of trait arousability, Current Psychology, (1995), 14: p.3-28.
19. Molloy, R. and R. Parasuraman. Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: Vigilance and task complexity effects. Human Factors, (1996), 38: p. 311-322.
20. Mosier, Kathleen L., Linda J. Skitka, and Susan T. Heers. Does automation bias decision-making? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, (1999), 51: p.991-1006.
21. Parasuraman, R. Memory load and event ratecontrol sensitivity decrements in sustained attention. Science, (1979), 205: p.924-927.
22. Parasuraman, R. Human-computer monitoring. Human Factors, (1987), 29: p.695-706.
23. Parasuraman, R. and D. R. Davies. Varieties of Attention. New York: Academic Press, 1984.
24. Parasuraman, R. and Giambra, L. Skill development in vigilance: Effects of event rate and age. Psychology and Aging, (1991), 6: p.155-169.
25. Paus, T. and R. Zatorre. Time-related changes in neural systems underlying attention and arousal during the performance of an auditory vigilance task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, (1997), 9: p. 392-408.
26. Pigeau, R. and R. G. Angus. Vigilance latencies to aircraft detection among NORAD surveillance operators. Human Factors, (1995), 37: p.622-634.
27. Singh, I. and R. Molloy. Individual differences in monitoring failures of automation. Journal of General Psychology, (1993), 120: p.357-373.
28. Stiff, JB, Kim, HJ, & Ramesh, CN. Truth biases and aroused suspicion in relational deception. Communication Research, (1992), 19: 326-345.
29. Tipples, J. and D. Sharma. Orienting to exogenous cues and attentional bias to affective pictures reflect separate processes. British Journal of Psychology, (2000), 91: 87-97.
30. Webster, W.H. Cybercrime... cyberterrorism... cyberwarfare... Washington D.C.: CSIS Press, 1998.
31. Wickens, C. Automation in air traffic control: The human performance issues. Report to the Federal Aviation Administration. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1999.
32. Zmud, R., "Opportunities for strategic information manipulation through new information technology," in Organizations and Information Technology, Fulk and Steinfeld, Editors. (1990), Sage Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA.