Feasibility study of a primary care-based model for stroke aftercare

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 56, Issue 531, 2006, Pages 775-780

  Murray, Jenni ^a   Young, John ^a   Forster, Anne ^a   Herbert, Gill ^b   Ashworth, Robert ^c  

^a ST LUKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Gill Herbert Consultancy and Development Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Patient care management; Primary healthcare; Stroke

Indexed keywords

AFTERCARE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; GROUP DYNAMICS; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PROBLEM SOLVING; STROKE;

AFTERCARE; AGED; CAREGIVERS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; STROKE;

EID: 33749613503     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Young J, Murray J, Forster A. Review of longer-term problems after disabling stroke. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology 2003; 13: 55-65.
2. Young JB. The primary care stroke gap. Br J Gen Pract 2001; 51: 787-788.
3. Department of Health. National service framework for older people. London: Department of Health, 2001.
4. Intercollegiate Working Party for Stroke. National clinical guidelines for stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2002.
5. Murray J, Ashworth R, Forster A, Young J. Developing a primary care-based stroke service: a review of the qualitative literature. Br J Gen Pract 2003; 53: 137-142.
6. Murray J, Young J, Forster A, Ashworth R. Developing a primary care-based stroke model: the prevalence of longer-term problems experienced by patients and carers. Br J Gen Pract 2003; 53: 803-807.
7. Department of Health. Guidance on the single assessment process for older people. HSC2002/001; LAC (2002) 1. London: Department of Health, 2002.
8. Orrell M, Hancock G. The Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly. London: Gaskell, 2004.
9. Philp I. EASY-Care: A systematic approach to the assessment of older people. Geriatric Medicine 2000; 30(5): 15-19.
10. Dowswell G, Lawler J, Young J. Unpacking the 'black-box' of nurse-led stroke support service. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14(2): 160-171.
11. Forster A, Young J. Stroke rehabilitation: can we do better? BMJ 1992; 305: 1446-1447.
12. Outpatient Service Trialists. Rehabilitation therapy services for stroke patients living at home: systematic review of randomised trials. Lancet 2004; 363: 352-356.
13. Knapp P, House A, Forster A, Young J. Review of non-drug strategies to address psycho-social difficulties after stroke. Age and Ageing 2000; 29: 23-30.
14. Allen KR, Hazelett S, Jarjoura D, et al. Effectiveness of a post-discharge care management model for stroke and transient ischemic attack: a randomised trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2002; 11(2): 88-98.
15. National Audit Office. Reducing brain injury: faster access to better stroke care. HC 452. London: Department of Health, 2005.
16. Murray J, Young J, Forster A, Ashworth R. A survey to investigate the role of the district nurse in stroke care. Br J Community Nurs 2004; 9(8): 318-324.