Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: The preferred technique in a small but important group of rectal neoplasms

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 731-732

  Haboubi, Najib ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANUS CONTINENCE; COST CONTROL; DEFECATION; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; EDITORIAL; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION; MICROSURGERY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECTOSCOPY; RECTUM ADENOMA; RECTUM BIOPSY; RECTUM CANCER; RECTUM POLYP; RECURRENCE RISK; RISK FACTOR; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC MICROSURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADENOMA; ENDOSCOPY; HUMANS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RECTAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 33749608781     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01141.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Leslie A, Carey FA, Pratt MR, Steele RJ. The colorectal adenoma - carcinoma sequence. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 845-60.
2. Stryker SJ, Wolf BG, Culp CE, Libbe SD, Ilstrup DM, MacCarty RL. Gastroenterology 1987; 93: 1009-13.
3. Cataldo PA, O'Brian S, Osler T. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: A prospective evaluation of functional results. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1366-71.
4. Absar MS, Haboubi NY. Colonic neoplastic polyps: Biopsy is not efficient to exclude malignancy. The Trafford experience. Tech Coloproctol 2004: 8; S257-60.
5. Middelton PF, Sutherland LM, Maddern GJ. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery:.A systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 270-84.
6. Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, et.al. Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2002; 235: 449-57.