메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 46, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1397-1405

A decision framework for natural resource management: A case study using plant introductions

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; INTRODUCED SPECIES; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 33749597004     PISSN: 08161089     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/EA05219     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (13)

References (29)
  • 1
    • 0012105151 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand and Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Forestry Ministers, Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra
    • ARMCANZ, ANZECCFM (1999) 'The national weeds strategy: a strategic approach to weed problems of national significance.' (Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand and Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Forestry Ministers, Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra)
    • (1999) The National Weeds Strategy: A Strategic Approach to Weed Problems of National Significance
  • 2
    • 0002473274 scopus 로고
    • The forestry problem: Adaptive lurches of renewal
    • (Eds LH Gunderson, CS Holling, SS Light). (Columbia University Press: New York, NY)
    • Baskerville GL (1995) The forestry problem: adaptive lurches of renewal. In 'Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions'. (Eds LH Gunderson, CS Holling, SS Light) pp. 86-102. (Columbia University Press: New York, NY)
    • (1995) Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions , pp. 86-102
    • Baskerville, G.L.1
  • 3
    • 13744256604 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Salinity mitigation versus weed risks - Can conflicts of interest in introducing new plants be resolved?
    • doi:10.1071/EA04049
    • Bennett SJ, Virtue JG (2004) Salinity mitigation versus weed risks - can conflicts of interest in introducing new plants be resolved? Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 1141-1156. doi:10.1071/EA04049
    • (2004) Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture , vol.44 , pp. 1141-1156
    • Bennett, S.J.1    Virtue, J.G.2
  • 5
    • 33749595531 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia: Canberra). (verified 21 March 2005)
    • Biosecurity Australia (2005) 'Draft administrative framework for import risk analysis. A handbook.' (Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia: Canberra). Available at http://www.daff.gov.au/corporate_docs/ publications/pdf/market_ac cess/biosecurity/IRA_framework.pdf (verified 21 March 2005).
    • (2005) Draft Administrative Framework for Import Risk Analysis. A Handbook
  • 6
    • 26844538938 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Economic evaluation of biological invasions - A survey
    • Born W, Rauschmayer F, Bräuer I (2005) Economic evaluation of biological invasions - a survey. Ecological Economics 55, 321-336.
    • (2005) Ecological Economics , vol.55 , pp. 321-336
    • Born, W.1    Rauschmayer, F.2    Bräuer, I.3
  • 7
    • 7044232108 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An essay on some topics concerning invasive species
    • doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01340.x
    • Brown JH, Sax DF (2004) An essay on some topics concerning invasive species. Austral Ecology 29, 530-536. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01340.x
    • (2004) Austral Ecology , vol.29 , pp. 530-536
    • Brown, J.H.1    Sax, D.F.2
  • 8
    • 21444442198 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Short note: Biological invasions and scientific objectivity: Reply to Cassey et al. (2005)
    • doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01504.x
    • Brown JH, Sax DF (2005) Short note: biological invasions and scientific objectivity: reply to Cassey et al. (2005). Austral Ecology 30, 481-483. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01504.x
    • (2005) Austral Ecology , vol.30 , pp. 481-483
    • Brown, J.H.1    Sax, D.F.2
  • 11
    • 21444446814 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Short note: Concerning invasive species: Reply to Brown and Sax
    • doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01505.x
    • Cassey P, Blackburn TM, Duncan RP, Chown SL (2005) Short note: concerning invasive species: reply to Brown and Sax. Austral Ecology 30, 475-480. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2005.01505.x
    • (2005) Austral Ecology , vol.30 , pp. 475-480
    • Cassey, P.1    Blackburn, T.M.2    Duncan, R.P.3    Chown, S.L.4
  • 13
    • 0028984819 scopus 로고
    • An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions
    • doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040761.x
    • Hobbs RJ, Humphries SE (1995) An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conservation Biology 9, 761-770. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09040761.x
    • (1995) Conservation Biology , vol.9 , pp. 761-770
    • Hobbs, R.J.1    Humphries, S.E.2
  • 17
    • 12244252031 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Pest risk assessment in the United States: Guidelines for qualitative assessments for weeds
    • (Eds RH Groves, FD Panetta, JG Virtue). (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
    • Lehtonen PP (2001) Pest risk assessment in the United States: guidelines for qualitative assessments for weeds. In 'Weed risk assessment.' (Eds RH Groves, FD Panetta, JG Virtue) pp. 117-123. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
    • (2001) Weed Risk Assessment , pp. 117-123
    • Lehtonen, P.P.1
  • 19
    • 0005883644 scopus 로고
    • Research paper no. 6. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra
    • Resource Assessment Commission (1992a) Multi-criteria analysis as a resource assessment tool. Research paper no. 6. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.
    • (1992) Multi-criteria Analysis as a Resource Assessment Tool
  • 22
    • 0000673014 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Federal Register (verified 20 March 2005).
    • United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Guidelines for ecological assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Federal Register 63(93):26846-26924. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ncea/ (verified 20 March 2005).
    • (1998) Guidelines for Ecological Assessment , vol.63 , Issue.93 , pp. 26846-26924
  • 23
    • 33645099319 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Priorities for weed risk assessment: Using a landscape context to assess indicators of functions, services and values
    • (Eds RH Groves, FD Panetta, JG Virtue). (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
    • Wainger LA, King DM (2001) Priorities for weed risk assessment: using a landscape context to assess indicators of functions, services and values. In 'Weed risk assessment'. (Eds RH Groves, FD Panetta, JG Virtue) pp. 34-51. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)
    • (2001) Weed Risk Assessment , pp. 34-51
    • Wainger, L.A.1    King, D.M.2
  • 25
    • 0038406105 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Confusing means with ends: A manager's reflections on experience in agricultural landscapes of Western Australia
    • doi:10.1046/j.1442-8903.2003.00134.x
    • Wallace KJ (2003) Confusing means with ends: a manager's reflections on experience in agricultural landscapes of Western Australia. Ecological Management and Restoration 4, 23-28. doi:10.1046/j.1442-8903.2003.00134.x
    • (2003) Ecological Management and Restoration , vol.4 , pp. 23-28
    • Wallace, K.J.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.