Are the peer assessment rating index and the index of treatment complexity, outcome, and need suitable measures for orthognathic outcomes?

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 462-466

  Templeton, K M ^a   Powell, R ^a   Moore, M B ^a   Williams, A C ^b   Sandy, J R ^c  

^a ROYAL DEVON AND EXETER HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c BRISTOL DENTAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; JAW; MALOCCLUSION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY;

HUMANS; JAW; MALOCCLUSION; OBSERVER VARIATION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33749592395     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cji120     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bailey L-J, Haltiwanger G H, Blakey G H, Proffit W R 2001 Who seeks surgical-orthodontic treatment: a current review. International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 16: 280-292
2. Bergström K, Halling A 1997 Comparison of three indices in evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 55: 36-43
3. Brook P H, Shaw W C 1989 The development of an index of orthodontic treatment priority. European Journal of Orthodontics 11: 309-320
4. Cons N C, Jenny J, Kohout F J 1986 DAI: the Dental Aesthetic Index. College of Dentistry, University of Iowa
5. Cunningham S, Crean S J, Hunt N P, Harris M 1996 a Preparation, perceptions and problems: a long-term follow-up study of orthognathic surgery. International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 11: 41-47
6. Cunningham S, Hunt N P, Feinmann C 1996b Perceptions of outcome following orthognathic surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 34: 210-213
7. Daniels C, Richmond S 2000 The development of the index of complexity, outcome and need (ICON). Journal of Orthodontics 27: 149-62
8. DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig K W L, Vig P S, Weyant R J, O'Brien K D 1995 The validation of the peer assessment rating for malocclusion severity and treatment diffi culty. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 107: 172-176
9. Finlay P M, Atkinson J M, Moos K F 1995 Orthognathic surgery: patient expectations; psychological profile and satisfaction with outcome. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 33: 9-14
10. Firestone A R, Beck F M, Beglin F M, Vig K W L 2002 a Evaluation of the Peer Assessment Rating index as an index of orthodontic treatment need. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 122: 463-469
11. Firestone A R, Beck F M, Beglin F M, Vig K W L 2002 b Validity of the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON) in determining orthodontic treatment need. Angle Orthodontist 72: 15-20
12. Fox N A, Daniels C, Gilgrass T 2002 A comparison of the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON) with the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) and the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). British Dental Journal 24: 193 225-230
13. Hinman C 1996 The Dental Practice Board. Orthodontics-the current status. British Journal of Orthdontics 22: 287-290
14. Jenny J, Cons N 1996 Comparing and contrasting two orthodontic indices, the index of orthodontic treatment need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 110: 410-416
15. Landis J R, Koch G G 1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33: 159-174
16. McMullan R E, Doubleday B, Muir J D, Harradine N W, Williams J K 2003 Development of a treatment outcome standard as a result of a clinical audit of the outcome of fixed appliance therapy undertaken by hospital-based consultant orthodontists in the UK. British Dental Journal 194: 81-84
17. Nurminen L, Pietilä T, Vinkka-Puhakka H 1999 Motivation for and satisfaction with orthodontic-surgical treatment: a retrospective study of 28 patients. European Journal of Orthodontics 21: 79-87
18. Richmond S et al. 1992 The development of the PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. European Journal of Orthodontics 14: 125-139
19. Siow K K, Ong S T, Lian C B, Ngeow W C 2002 Satisfaction of orthognathic surgical patients in a Malaysian population. Journal of Oral Science 44: 165-171
20. Younis J W, Vig K W L, Rinchuse D J, Weyant R J 1997 A validation study of three indexes of orthodontic treatment need in the United States. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 25: 358-362
21. Zhou Y H, Hägg U, Rabie A B M 2001 Patient satisfaction following orthognathic surgical correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery 16: 99-107