Erratum: Gabor filters and phase portraits for the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms (Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 10.1007/s11517-006-0088-3);Gabor filters and phase portraits for the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms

Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

Volumn 44, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 883-894

  Rangayyan, Rangaraj M ^a   Ayres, Fábio J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Architectural distortion; Breast cancer; Computer aided diagnosis; Gabor filters; Mammography; Oriented texture; Phase portraits

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; CALCIFICATION (BIOCHEMISTRY); COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; RADIOLOGY; TUMORS;

ARCHITECTURAL DISTORTION; BREAST CANCER; GABOR FILTERS; MAMMOGRAMS; PHASE PORTRAITS;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; NOISE; PECTORAL MUSCLE; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33749572444     PISSN: 01400118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-006-0109-2     Document Type: Erratum

References (43)

1. American College of Radiology (ACR) (1998) Illustrated breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston
2. Ayres FJ, Rangayyan RM (2004) Detection of architectural distortion in mammograms using phase portraits. In: Fitzpatrick JM, Sonka M (eds) Proceedings of SPIE medical imaging 2004: Image processing, vol 5370. San Diego, pp 587-597
3. Ayres FJ, Rangayyan RM (2005a) Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 24(1):59-67
4. Ayres FJ, Rangayyan RM (2005b) Detection of architectural distortion in mammograms via analysis of phase portraits and curvilinear structures. In: Hozman J, Kneppo P (eds) Proceedings of EMBEC'05: 3rd European medical and biological engineering conference, vol 11. Prague, Czech Republic, pp 1768-1773
5. Ayres FJ, Rangayyan RM (2005c) Performance analysis of oriented feature detectors. In: Proceedings of SIBGRAPI 2005: XVIII Brazilian symposium on computer graphics and image processing. IEEE Computer Society Press, Natal, pp 147-154
6. Baker JA, Rosen EL, Lo JY, Gimenez EI, Walsh R, Soo MS (2003) Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: Sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion. Am J Roentgenol 181:1083-1088
7. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC (1992) Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184:613-617
8. Broeders MJM, Onland-Moret NC, Rijken HJTM, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek ALM, Holland R (1993) Use of previous screening mammograms to identify features indicating cases that would have a possible gain in prognosis following earlier detection. Eur J Cancer 39:1770-1775
9. Burrell HC, Sibbering DM, Wilson ARM, Pinder SE, Evans AJ, Yeoman LJ, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Blamey RW, Robertson JFR (1996) Screening interval breast cancers: Mammographic features and prognostic factors. Radiology 199:811-817
10. Canny J (1986) A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 8(6):679-698
11. Cerneaz N, Brady M (1994) Enriching digital mammogram image analysis with a description of the curvi-linear structures. In: Gale AG, Astley SM, Dance DR, Cairns AY (eds) Digital mammography: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on digital mammography. Elsevier, York, pp 297-306
12. Dougherty ER (1992) An introduction to morphological image processing. SPIE, Bellingham
13. Ferrari RJ, Rangayyan RM, Desautels JEL, Frère AF (2001) Analysis of asymmetry in mammograms via directional filtering with Gabor wavelets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(9):953-963
14. Ferrari RJ, Rangayyan RM, Borges RA, Frère AF (2004a) Segmentation of the fibro-glandular disc in mammograms using Gaussian mixture modeling. Med Biol Eng Comput 42:378-387
15. Ferrari RJ, Rangayyan RM, Desautels JEL, Borges RA, Frère AF (2004b) Identification of the breast boundary in mammograms using active contour models. Med Biol Eng Comput 42:201-208
16. Gershenfeld N (1999) The nature of mathematical modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
17. Homer MJ (1997) Mammographic interpretation: A practical approach, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
18. Ichikawa T, Matsubara T, Hara T, Fujita H, Endo T, Iwase T (2004) Automated detection method for architectural distortion areas on mammograms based on morphological processing and surface analysis. In: Fitzpatrick JM, Sonka M (eds) Proceedings of SPIE medical imaging 2004: image processing, SPIE, San Diego, pp 920-925
19. Jamal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, Ries LAG, Wu X, Jamison PM, Wingo PA, Howe HL, Anderson RN, Edwards BK (2004) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer 101(1):3-27
20. Karssemeijer N, te Brake GM (1996) Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 15(5):611-619
21. Kass M, Witkin A (1987) Analyzing oriented patterns. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 37:362-385
22. Kegelmeyer WP Jr (1994) Evaluation of stellate lesion detection in a standard mammogram data set. In: Bowyer KW, Astley S (eds) State of the art in digital mammographic image analysis. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 262-279
23. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671-680
24. Liu S, Babbs CF, Delp EJ (2001) Multiresolution detection of spiculated lesions in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Image Process 10(6):874-884
25. Manjunath BS, Ma WY (1996) Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 18(8):837-842
26. Matsubara T, Fukuoka D, Yagi N, Hara T, Fujita H, Inenaga Y, Kasai S, Kano A, Endo T, Iwase T (2005) Detection method for architectural distortion based on analysis of structure of mammary gland on mammograms. In: Proceedings of the 19th international congress and exhibition on computer assisted radiology and surgery (CARS 2005). Elsevier, Berlin, pp 1036-1040
27. Metz CE (1986) ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 21:720-733
28. Mudigonda NR, Rangayyan RM (2001) Texture flow-field analysis for the detection of architectural distortion in mammograms. In: Ramakrishnan AG (ed) Proceedings of biovision, Bangalore, pp 76-81
29. Mudigonda NR, Rangayyan RM, Desautels JEL (2001) Detection of breast masses in mammograms by density slicing and texture flow-field analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(12):1215-1227
30. National Cancer Institute of Canada (2005) Canadian cancer statistics 2005. Toronto, Canada, available at http://www.cancer.ca/vgn/images/ portal/cit_86751114/48/28/401594768cw_2005stats_en.pdf, accessed on Oct 27, 2005.
31. Nguyen HT, Hung WT, Thornton BS, Lee W, Rickard M, Berry MW (2001) Detection of stellates and masses in digitised mammograms. In: Proceedings of the 23rd annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (CD-ROM), Istanbul, Turkey, pp 2709-2711
32. Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9(1):62-66
33. Qian W, Li L, Clarke LP, Mao F, Clark RA (1998) Adaptive CAD modules for mass detection in digital mammography. In: Chang HK, Zhang YT (eds) Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, vol 2. Hong Kong, pp 1013-1016
34. Rao AR (1990) A taxonomy for texture description and identification. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
35. Rao AR, Jain RC (1992) Computerized flow field analysis: Oriented texture fields. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(7):693-709
36. Rao AR, Schunck BG (1991) Computing oriented texture fields. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 53(2):157-185
37. Sampat MP, Whitman GJ, Markey MK, Bovik AC (2005) Evidence based detection of spiculated masses and architectural distortion. In: Fitzpatrick JM, Reinhardt JM (eds) Proceedings of SPIE medical imaging 2005: Image processing, vol 5747, San Diego, pp 26-37
38. Sickles EA (1986) Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. Am J Roentgenol 146:661-663
39. Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R (1993) Image processing, analysis and machine vision, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, London
40. Suckling J, Parker J, Dance DR, Astley S, Hutt I, Boggis CRM, Ricketts I, Stamakis E, Cerneaz N, Kok SL, Taylor P, Betal D, Savage J (1994) The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. In: Gale AG, Astley SM, Dance DD, Cairns AY (eds) Digital mammography: proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on digital mammography, Elsevier, York, pp 375-378
41. Wylie CR, Barrett LC (1995) Advanced engineering mathematics, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
42. Zwiggelaar R, Parr TC, Hutt IW, Taylor CJ, Astley SM, Boggis CRM (1999) Model-based detection of spiculated lesions in mammograms. Med Image Anal 3(1):39-63
43. Zwiggelaar R, Astley SM, Boggis CRM, Taylor CJ (2004) Linear structures in mammographic images: Detection and classification. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23(9):1077-1086