A two-pass approach for handling out-of-vocabulary words in a large vocabulary recognition task

Computer Speech and Language

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 206-218

  Scharenborg, Odette ^a   Seneff, Stephanie ^b   Boves, Lou ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LARGE FALLBACK LEXICONS; TELEPHONE ACCESS SPOKEN DIALOGUE SYSTEMS;

GRAPH THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH CODING; SPEECH SYNTHESIS;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 33749572014     PISSN: 08852308     EISSN: 10958363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2006.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bazzi, I., Glass, J.R., 2000. Modeling out-of-vocabulary words for robust speech recognition. In: Proceedings of ICSLP, Beijing, China, pp. 401-404.
2. Bazzi, I., Glass, J.R., 2001. Learning units for domain-independent out-of-vocabulary word modeling. In: Proceedings of Eurospeech, Aalborg, Denmark, pp. 61-64.
3. Bouwman, G., Boves, L., 2001. Using information on lexical stress for utterance verification. In: Proceedings of ITRW on Prosody in ASRU, Red Bank, NJ, pp. 29-34.
4. Chung, G., Wang, C., Seneff, S., Filisko, E., Tang, M., 2004a. Combining linguistic knowledge and acoustic information in automatic pronunciation lexicon generation. In: Proceedings of Interspeech, Jeju Island, Korea, pp. 328-332.
5. Chung, G., Seneff, S., Wang, C., Hetherington, I.L., 2004b. A dynamic vocabulary spoken dialogue interface. In: Proceedings of ICSLP, Jeju Island, Korea, pp. 327-330.
6. Geutner, P., Finke, M., Waibel, A., 1999. Selection criteria for hypothesis driven lexical adaptation. In: Proceedings of ICASSP, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 617-620.
7. Glass J.R. A probabilistic framework for segment-based speech recognition. Computer Speech and Language 17 (2003) 137-152
8. Glass, J.R., Hazen, T.J., Hetherington, I.L., 1999. Real-time telephone-based speech recognition in the Jupiter domain. In: Proceedings of ICASSP, Phoenix, AZ, pp. 61-64.
9. Laureys, T., Vandeghinste, V., Duchateau, J., 2002. A hybrid approach to compounds in LVCSR. In: Proceedings of ICSLP, Denver, CO, pp. 697-700.
10. Ney H., and Ortmanns S. Progress in dynamic programming search for LVCSR. Proceedings of the IEEE 88 8 (2000) 1224-1240
11. Norris D. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52 (1994) 189-234
12. Scharenborg O., Norris D., ten Bosch L., and McQueen J.M. How should a speech recognizer work?. Cognitive Science 29 6 (2005) 867-918
13. Scharenborg, O., Boves, L., ten Bosch, L., in press. 'Early recognition' of polysyllabic words in continuous speech. Computer Speech and Language, in press, doi:10.1016/j.csl.2005.12.001.
14. Seneff S. Response planning and generation in the Mercury flight reservation system. Computer Speech and Language 16 (2002) 283-312
15. Seneff S. The use of subword linguistic modeling for multiple tasks in speech recognition. Speech Communication 42 3-4 (2004) 373-390
16. Seneff, S., Wang, C., Hazen, T.J., 2003. Automatic induction of N-gram language models from a natural language grammar. In: Proceedings of Eurospeech, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 641-644.
17. Sturm J., and Boves L. Effective error recovery strategies for multimodal form-filling applications. Speech Communication 45 (2005) 289-303
18. Tang, M., Seneff, S., Zue, V., 2003. Two-stage speech recognition using feature-based models: a preliminary study. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands, pp. 49-54.
19. Zue V., Seneff S., Glass J., Polifroni J., Pao C., Hazen T.J., and Hetherington L. Jupiter: a telephone-based conversational interface for weather information. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 8 1 (2000) 85-96