Mothers and daughters "do," fathers "don't do" family: Gender and generational bonds

Journal of Marriage and Family

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 812-816

  Bianchi, Suzanne M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749569218     PISSN: 00222445     EISSN: 17413737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00296.x     Document Type: Note

References (15)

1. Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1-16.
2. Casper, L. M., & Bryson, K. R. (1998). Co-resident grandparents and their grandchildren: Grandparent maintained families (Current Population Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
3. Connidis, I. A., & McMullin, J. A. (2002). Sociological ambivalence and family ties: A critical perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 558-567.
4. Cox, D. (2003). Private transfers within the family: Mothers, fathers, sons and daughters. In A. H. Munnell & A. Sunden (Eds.), Death and dollars: The role of gifts and bequests in America (pp. 168-197). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
5. Elder, G. H., Jr., & Conger, R. D. (2000). Children of the land: Adversity and success in rural America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Hagestead, G. O. (1996). On-time, off-time, out of time? Reflections on continuity and discontinuity from an illness perspective. In V. L. Bengtson (Ed.), Adulthood and aging: Research on continuities and discontinuities (pp. 204-222). New York: Springer.
7. Katz, R., Lowenstein, A., Phillips, J., & Daatland, S. O. (2005). Theorizing intergenerational family relations: Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence in cross-national contexts. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 393-420). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. McGarry, K. (2003). Comment. In A. H. Munnell & A. Sunden (Eds.), Death and dollars: The role of gifts and bequests in America (pp. 202-209). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
9. Nelson, M. K. (2006). Single mothers "do" family. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 781-795.
10. Pillemer, K., & Suitor, J. J. (2005). Ambivalence and the study of intergenerational relations. In M. Silverstein (Ed.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, Vol. 24: Focus on intergenerational relations across time and place (pp. 3-28). New York: Springer.
11. Riley, M. W., & Riley, J. W. (1993). Connections: Kin and cohort. In V. L. Bengtson & W. A. Achenbaum (Eds.), The changing contract across generations. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
12. Smith, D. E. (1993). The standard north American family: SNAF as an ideological code. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 50-65.
13. Uhlenberg, P. (2005). Historical forces shaping grandparent-grandchild relationships: Demography and beyond. In M. Silverstein (Ed.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, Vol. 24: Focus on intergenerational relations across time and place (pp. 77-97). New York: Springer.
14. Umberson, D., & Slaten, E. (2000). Gender and intergenerational relationships. In D. H. Demo, K. R. Allen, & M. A. Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 105-127). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Walker, A. J., Allen, K. R., & Connidis, I. A. (2005). Theorizing and studying sibling ties in adulthood. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 167-190). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.