Morphological convergence or lineage sorting? The case of Cytisus purgans auct. (Leguminosae)

Taxon

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 695-704

  Cubas, Paloma ^a   Pardo, Cristina ^a   Tahiri, Hikmat ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES   (Morocco)

Author keywords

Cytisus purgans; ETS; ITS; Lineage sorting; Molecular phylogeny; trnL trnF IGS; Western Mediterranean

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; DNA; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT; MORPHOLOGY; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION GENETICS;

MEDITERRANEAN REGION; MEDITERRANEAN SEA;

CYTISUS; CYTISUS BALANSAE; CYTISUS OROMEDITERRANEUS; CYTISUS PURGANS; FABACEAE;

EID: 33749560095     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/25065645     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Acevedo-Rosas, R., Cameron, K., Sosa, V. & Pel, S. 2004. A molecular phylogenetic study of Graptopetalum (Crassulaceae) based on ETS, ITS, rpl16, and trnL-F nucleotide sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 1099-1104.
2. Aïnouche, A. K. & Bayer, R. J. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships in Lupinus (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) based on internal transcribed spacer sequences (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 590-607.
3. Aïnouche, A. K., Bayer, R. J., Cubas, P. & Misset, M. T. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships within Genisteae (Papilionoideae) with special reference to genus Ulex. Pp. 239-252 in: Klitgaard, B. B. & Bruneau, A. (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, part 10, Higher Level Systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
4. Andreasen, K. & Baldwin, B. G. 2003. Reexamination of relationships, habital evolution, and phylogeography of checker mallows (Sidalcea; Malvaceae) based on molecular phylogenetic data. Amer. J. Bot. 90: 436-444.
5. Avise, J. C. 2004. Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
6. Baldwin, B. G. & Markos, S. 1998. Phylogenetic utility of the external transcribed spacer (ETS) of 18S-26S rDN A: congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia (Compositae). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 10: 449-463.
7. Bena, G., Prosperi, J.-M., Lejeune, B. & Olivieri, I. 1998. Evolution of annual species of the genus Medicago: a molecular phylogenetic approach. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 9: 552-559.
8. Briquet, J. 1894. Etudes sur les Cytises des Alpes Maritimes. Georg. & Co, Genève et Basel.
9. Cantó, P. & Rivas-Martínez, S. 2002. Cytisus oromediterraneus y Cytisus balansae (Cytiseae, Leguminosae) dos especies europeas. Lazaroa 23: 3-6.
10. Chandler, G. T., Bayer, R. J. & Crisp, M. D. 2001. A molecular phylogeny of the endemic Australian genus Gastrolobium (Fabaceae: Mirbelieae) and allied genera using chloroplast and nuclear markers. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 1675-1687.
11. Crisp, M. D., Gilmore, S. & Van Wyk, B.-E. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of the genistoid tribes of papilionoid legumes. Pp. 249-276 in: Herendeen, P. S. & Bruneau, A. (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics 9. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
12. Cubas, P., Pardo, C. & Tahiri, H. 2002. Molecular approach to the phylogeny and systematics of Cytisus (Leguminosae) and related genera based on nucleotide sequences of nrDNA (ITS region) and cpDNA (trnL-trnF intergenic spacer). Pl. Syst. Evol. 233: 223-242.
13. De Castro, O., Cozzolino, S., Jury, S. L. & Caputo, P. 2002. Molecular relationships in Genista L. Sect. Spartocarpus Spach (Fabaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 244: 93-119.
14. Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E. & Quattro, J. M. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
15. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
16. Frodin, D. G. & Heywood, V. H. 1968. Cytisus L. Pp. 86-90 in: Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M. & Webb, D. A. (eds.) Flora Europaea, vol. 2. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
17. Higgins, D. G., Bleasby, A. J. & Fuchs, R. 1992. Clustal V: improved software for multiple sequence alignment. Comput. Appl. Biosc. 8: 189-191.
18. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
19. Käss, E. & Wink, M. 1997a. Phylogenetic relationships in the Papilionoideae (family Leguminosae) based on nucleotide sequences of cpDNA (rbcL) and ncDNA (ITS1 and 2). Molec. Phylog. Evol. 8: 65-88.
20. Käss, E. & Wink, M. 1997b. Molecular phylogeny and phylogeography of Lupinus (Leguminosae) inferred from nucleotide sequences rbcL gene and ITS 1+2 regions of rDNA. Pl. Syst. Evol. 208: 139-167.
21. López González, G. 2000. Sobre el Cytisus balansae (Boiss.) Ball [C. purgans auct., non (L.) Boiss] (Leguminosae) y sus razas geográficas. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 57: 447-450.
22. López González, G. & Jarvis, C. E. 1984. De linnaei plantis hispanicis novitates nonnullae. Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 40: 341-344.
23. Neigel, J. E. & Avise, C. 1986. Phylogenetic relationships of mitochondrial DNA under various demographic models of speciation. Pp. 515-534 in: Nemo, E. & Karlin, S. (eds.), Evolutionary Processes and Theory. Academic Press, New York.
24. Pardo, C., Cubas, P. & Tahiri, H. 2004. Molecular phylogeny and systematics of Genista (Leguminosae) and related genera based on nucleotide sequences of nrDNA (ITS region) and cpDNA (trnL-trnF intergenic spacer). Pl. Syst. Evol. 244: 93-119.
25. Polhill, P. 1976. Genisteae (Adans) Benth. and related tribes. Syst. Bot. 1: 143-362.
26. Polhill, P. & Van Wyk, B.-E. 2005. Tribe Genisteae. Pp. 283-297 in: Lewis, G., Schrire, B., Mackinder, B. & Lock, M. (eds.), The Legumes of the World. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
27. Rannala, B. & Yang, Z. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Molec. Evol. 43: 304-311.
28. Rodríguez, F., Oliver, J. F., Marin, A. & Medina, J. R. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitutions. J. Theor. Biol. 142: 485-501.
29. Rivas Martínez, S., Díaz, T. E., Prieto, J. A. F., Loidi, J. & Penas, A. 1984. La Vegetación de la Alta Montaña Cantábrica. Los Picos de Europa. Ediciones Leonesas, León.
30. Schneider, S., Roessli, D. & Excoffier, L. 2000. Arlequin ver 2.000: a Software for Population Genetics Data Analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory. Univ. Geneva, Switzerland.
31. Swofford, D. L. 2000. PAUP*: Phylogenetics Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other Methods). Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
32. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Molec. Biol. 17: 1105-1109.
33. Talavera, S. & Gibbs, P. 1997. Cytisus purgans auct. (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) comprises four distinct species. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 125: 331-342.
34. Vander Stappen, J., Marant, S. & Volckaert, S. 2003. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic utility of the rDNA external transcribed spacer region in Stylosanthes (Fabaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 291-298.
35. Weber, A. 2003. What is morphology and why is it time for its renaissance in plant systematics? Pp. 3-32 in: Stuessy, T. F., Mayer, V. & Hörandl, E. (eds.), Deep Morphology. Towards a Renaissance of Morphology in Plant Systematics. A. R. G. Gantner Verlag K. G., Liechtenstein.
36. Wendel, J. F. & Doyle, J. J. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. Pp. 265-296 in: Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S. & Doyle, J. J. (eds.), Molecular Systematics of Plants II. DNA sequencing. Kluwer Academic Publ., Boston.
37. White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. Pp. 315-322 in: Innis M. A., Gelfand D. H., Sninsky J. J. & White T. J. (eds.), PCR Protocols. A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, New York.