The 0/0 problem in the fuzzy-logical model of perception

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Volumn 120, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1795-1798

  Schwartz, Jean Luc ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIO-VISUAL RESPONSE; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR;

ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING;

FUZZY SETS;

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONFLICT; DATA ANALYSIS; MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; BAYES THEOREM; FUZZY LOGIC; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33749545789     PISSN: 00014966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1121/1.2258814     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cathiard, M. A., Schwartz, J. L., and Abry, C. (2001). " Asking a naive question to the McGurk effect: Why does audio [b] give more [d] percepts with visual [g] than with visual [d] ?, " Proceedings of AVSP'2001, pp. 138-142.
2. Cutting, J. E., Brady, N. P., Bruno, N., and Moore, C. (1992). " Selectivity, scope, and simplicity of models: A lesson from fitting judgments of perceived depth., " J. Exp. Psychol. 121, 364-381.
3. Dunn, J. C. (2000). " Model complexity: The fit to random data reconsidered., " Psychol. Res. 63, 174-182.
4. Grant, K. W., and Seitz, P. F. (1998). " Measures of auditory-visual integration in nonsense syllables and sentences., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 2438-2450.
5. Grant, K. W., Walden, B. E., and Seitz, P. F. (1998). " Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: Consonant recognition, sentence recognition and auditory-visual integration., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 2677-2690.
6. Green, K. P. (1998). " The use of auditory and visual information during phonetic processing: Implications for theories of speech perception., " in Hearing by Eye II, edited by, R. Campbell,,, B. Dodd,, and, D. Burnham, (Psychology Press, Hove, UK), pp. 3-25.
7. Jones, J. A., and Callan, D. E. (2003). " Brain activation during an audiovisual speech perception task: An fMRI study of the McGurk effect., " NeuroReport 14, 1129-1133.
8. MacKay, D. J. C. (1992). " Bayesian interpolation., " Neural Comput. 4, 415-447.
9. Massaro, D. W. (1987). Speech Perception by Ear and Eye: A Paradigm for Psychological Inquiry (Laurence Erlbaum Associates, London).
10. Massaro, D. W. (1998). Perceiving Talking Faces (MIT, Cambridge).
11. Massaro, D. W., and Cohen, M. M. (1993). " The Paradigm and the Fuzzy Logical Model of Perception are alive and well., " J. Exp. Psychol. 122, 115-124.
12. Massaro, D. W., and Cohen, M. M. (2000). " Tests of auditory-visual integration efficiency within the framework of the fuzzy-logical model of perception., " J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 784-789.
13. Massaro, D. W., Cohen, M. M., Campbell, C. S., and Rodriguez, T. (2001). " Bayes factor of model selection validates FLMP., " Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 1-17.
14. McGurk, H., and MacDonald, J. (1976). " Hearing lips and seeing voices., " Nature (London) 264, 746-748.
15. Myung, I. J., and Pitt, M. A. (1997). " Applying Occam's razor in modeling cognition: A Bayesian approach., " Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4, 79-95.
16. Pitt, M. A., Kim, W., and Myung, I. J. (2003). " Flexibility versus generalizability in model selection., " Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 29-44.
17. Pitt, M. A., and Myung, I. J. (2002). " When a good fit can be bad., " Trends in Cognitive Science 6, 421-425.
18. Sekiyama, K., Kanno, I., Miura, S., and Sugita, Y. (2003). " Auditory-visual speech perception examined by fMRI and PET., " Neurosci. Res. (N Y) 47, 277-287.
19. Tiippana, K., Andersen, T. S., and Sams, M. (2004). " Visual attention modulates audiovisual speech perception., " European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16, 457-472.