The blue tit's song is an inconsistent signal of male condition

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1029-1040

  Parker, Timothy H ^a,b,f   Barr, Iain R ^c,d   Griffith, Simon C ^a,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^f WHITMAN COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Condition dependence; Dawn song; Meta analysis; Parus caeruleus; Survival; Ultraviolet

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; BREEDING SEASON; MALE BEHAVIOR; META-ANALYSIS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNALING; SONGBIRD; SURVIVAL;

CYANISTES CAERULEUS; PARUS CAERULEUS;

EID: 33749524022     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arl041     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Andersson M. 1986. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40:804-16.
2. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
3. Andersson S, Amundsen T. 1997. Ultraviolet colour vision and ornamentation in bluethroats. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264:1587-91.
4. Andersson S, Ornborg J, Andersson M. 1998. Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:445-50.
5. Badyaev AV, Hill GE, Dunn PO, Glen JC. 2001. Plumage color as a composite trait: developmental and functional integration of sexual ornamentation. Am Nat 158:221-35.
6. Balsby TJS. 2000. Song activity and variability in relation to male quality and female choice in Whitethroats Sylvia communis. J Avian Biol 31:56-62.
7. Bijnens L. 1988. Blue tit Parus caeruleus song in relation to survival, reproduction and biometry. Bird Study 35:61-7.
8. Bijnens L, Dhondt AA. 1984. Vocalizations in a Belgian blue tit, Parus c. caeruleus, population. Le Gerfaut 74:243-69.
9. Buchanan KL, Leitner S, Spencer KA, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2004. Developmental stress selectively affects the song control nucleus HVC in the zebra finch. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:2381-6.
10. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. 1995. Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Dale J. 2000. Ornamental plumage does not signal male quality in red-billed queleas. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:2143-9.
12. Doutrelant C, Blondel J, Perret P, Lambrechts MM. 2000. Blue tit song repertoire size, male quality and interspecific competition. J Avian Biol 31:360-6.
13. Dreiss A, Richard M, Moyen F, White J, Møller AP, Danchin E. 2006. Sex ratio and male sexual characters in a population of blue tits, Parus caeruleus. Behav Ecol 17:13-9.
14. Eberhardt LS. 1994. Oxygen-consumption during singing by male Carolina wrens (Thryothorus ludovicianus). Auk 111:124-30.
15. Foerster K, Poesel A, Kunc H, Kempenaers B. 2002. The natural plasma testosterone profile of male blue tits during the breeding season and its relation to song output. J Avian Biol 33:269-75.
16. Forstmeier W, Hasselquist D, Bensch S, Leisler B. 2006. Does song reflect age and viability? A comparison between two populations of the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:634-43.
17. Forstmeier W, Kempenaers B, Meyer A, Leisler B. 2002. A novel song parameter correlates with extra-pair paternity and reflects male longevity. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:1479-85.
18. Forstmeier W, Leisler B. 2004. Repertoire size, sexual selection, and offspring viability in the great reed warbler: changing patterns in space and time. Behav Ecol 15:555-63.
19. Galeotti P, Saino N, Sacchi R, Moller AP. 1997. Song correlates with social context, testosterone and body condition in male barn swallows. Anim Behav 53:687-700.
20. Gaunt AS, Bucher TL, Gaunt SLL, Baptista LF. 1996. Is singing costly? Auk 113:718-21.
21. Gil D, Cobb JLS, Slater PJB. 2001. Song characteristics are age dependent in the willow warbler, Phylloscopus trochilus. Anim Behav 62:689-94.
22. Gosler AG. 1996. Environmental and social determinants of winter fat storage in the great tit Parus major. J Anim Ecol 65:1-17.
23. Gosler AG, Harper D. 2000. Assessing the heritability of body condition in birds: a challenge exemplified by the great tit Parus major L. (Aves). Biol J Linn Soc 71:103-17.
24. Greene E, Lyon BE, Muehter VR, Ratcliffe L, Oliver SJ, Boag PT. 2000. Disruptive sexual selection for plumage coloration in a passerine bird. Nature 407:1000-3.
25. Griffith SC, Ornborg J, Russell AF, Andersson S, Sheldon BC. 2003. Correlations between ultraviolet coloration, overwinter survival and offspring sex ratio in the blue tit. J Evol Biol 16:1045-54.
26. Griffith SC, Pryke SR. 2006. Benefits to female birds of assessing color displays. In: Hill GE, McGraw KJ, editors. Bird coloration, volume 2: function and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. p 233-79.
27. Gurevitch J, Hedges LV. 1999. Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 80:1142-49.
28. Iwasa Y, Pomiankowski A. 1994. The evolution of mate preferences for multiple sexual ornaments. Evolution 48:853-67.
29. Kempenaers B, Verheyen GR, Dhondt AA. 1997. Extrapair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behav Ecol 8:481-92.
30. Kipper S, Mundry R, Sommer C, Hultsch H, Todt D. 2006. Song repertoire size is correlated with body measures and arrival date in common nightingales, Luscinia megarhynchos. Anim Behav 71:211-7.
31. Kokko H, Brooks R, McNamara JM, Houston AI. 2002. The sexual selection continuum. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci Ser B 269:1331-40.
32. Lambrechts M, Dhondt AA. 1986. Male quality, reproduction, and survival in the great tit (Parus major). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:57-63.
33. Lampe HM, Espmark YO. 1994. Song structure reflects male quality in pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim Behav 47:869-76.
34. Ligon JD. 1999. The evolution of avian breeding systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Ligon JD, Kimball R, Merola-Zwartjes M. 1998. Mate choice by female red junglefowl: the issues of multiple ornaments and fluctuating asymmetry. Anim Behav 55:41-50.
36. Mace R. 1989. The dawn chorus in the great tit Parus major is directly related to female fertility. Nature 330:745-6.
37. Mennill DJ, Ratcliffe LM, Boag PT. 2002. Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. Science 296:873.
38. Møller AP, Jennions MD. 2002. How much variance can be explained by ecologists and evolutionary biologists? Oecologia 132:492-500.
39. Møller AP, Pomiankowski A. 1993. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:167-76.
40. Nowicki S, Hasselquist D, Bensch S, Peters S. 2000. Nestling growth and song repertoire size in great reed warblers: evidence for song learning as an indicator mechanism in mate choice. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:2419-24.
41. Nowicki S, Peters S, Podos J. 1998. Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Am Zool 38:179-90.
42. Otter K, Chruszcz B, Ratcliffe L. 1997. Honest advertisement and song output during the dawn chorus of black-capped chickadees. Behav Ecol 8:167-73.
43. Palmer AR. 1999. Detecting publication bias in meta-analyses: a case study of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Am Nat 154:220-33.
44. Parker TH, Ligon JD. 2002. Dominant male red junglefowl test the dominance status of other males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 53:20-4.
45. Parker TH, Stansberry BM, Becker CD, Gipson PS. 2003. Do melaninor carotenoid-pigmented plumage ornaments signal condition and predict pairing success in the Kentucky warbler? Condor 105: 663-71.
46. Parker TH, Stansberry BM, Becker CD, Gipson PS. 2005. Edge and area effects on the occurrence of migrant forest songbirds. Conserv Biol 19:1157-67.
47. Podos J, Huber SK, Taft B. 2004. Bird song: the interface of evolution and mechanism. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:55-87.
48. Poesel A, Foerster K, Kempenaers B. 2001. The dawn song of the blue tit Parus caeruleus and its role in sexual selection. Ethology 107:521-31.
49. Poesel A, Kempenaers B. 2000. When a bird is tired from singing: a study of drift during the dawn chorus. Etología 8:1-7.
50. Pryke SR, Andersson S, Lawes MJ. 2001. Sexual selection of multiple handicaps in the red-collared widowbird: female choice of tail length but not carotenoid display. Evolution 55:1452-63.
51. Rinden H, Lampe HM, Slagsvold T, Espmark YO. 2000. Song quality does not indicate male parental abilities in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca. Behaviour 137:809-23.
52. Rosenberg KV, Adams DC, Gurevitch J. 2000. MetaWin 2.0 user's manual. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
53. Rosenberg MS, Adams DC, Gurevitch J. 1997. MetaWin 2.1 ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
54. Rosenthal R. 1984. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
55. Ryan MJ. 1998. Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science 281:1999-2003.
56. Schluter D, Price T. 1993. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 253:117-22.
57. Senar JC, Figuerola J, Pascual J. 2002. Brighter yellow blue tits make better parents. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:257-61.
58. Sheldon BC, Andersson S, Griffith SC, Ornborg J, Sendecka J. 1999. Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature 402:874-7.
59. Sheldon BC,West SA. 2004. Maternal dominance, maternal condition, and offspring sex ratio in ungulate mammals. Am Nat 163:40-54.
60. Slagsvold T, Dale S, Saetre GP. 1994. Dawn singing in the great tit (Parus major): mate attraction, mate guarding, or territorial defense. Behaviour 131:115-38.
61. Spencer KA, Buchanan KL, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2003. Song as an honest signal of developmental stress in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Horm Behav 44:132-9.
62. Spencer KA, Buchanan KL, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2004. Developmental stress, social rank and song complexity in the European starling (Stumus vulgaris). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:S121-3.
63. Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K. 2005. Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science 308:1934-7.
64. Thomas RJ. 2002. The costs of singing in nightingales. Anim Behav 63:959-66.
65. Ward S, Lampe HM, Slater PJB. 2004. Singing is not energetically demanding for pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca. Behav Ecol 15:477-84.