Use of technology as an evaluation tool of clinical care in preterm newborns;Uso da tecnologia como ferramenta de avaliação no cuidado clínico de recém-nascidos prematuros

Jornal de Pediatria

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 371-376

  Mendes, Izabel ^a,d   De Carvalho, Manoel ^b   Almeida, Rosimary Terezinha ^c   Moreira, Maria Elizabeth ^a  

^a INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

^b FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^d NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Evaluation of clinical practices; Intensive care; Preterm newborns; Severity scores; Use of technology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE TEST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ETHICS; FISHER EXACT TEST; GESTATION PERIOD; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MORBIDITY; NEWBORN; PREMATURITY; PRENATAL PERIOD; RANK SUM TEST; SCORING SYSTEM; STUDENT T TEST; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 33749522020     PISSN: 00217557     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2223/JPED.1535     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Soll RF, Andruscavage L. The principles and practices of evidence-based neonatology. Pediatrics. 1999;103:215-24.
2. Almeida RT, Panerai RB, Carvalho M, Lopes JMA. Avaliação de cuidados intensivos neonatais. Cad Cienc Tec. 1991;3:45-9.
3. Panerai RB, Almeida RT, Portela MC, de Carvalho M, Coura-Silho O, da Costa TP. Estimating the effectiveness of perinatal care technologies by expert opinion. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1991;7:367-78.
4. Krauss LS. Technology Assessment of different levels of neonatal care [dissertação]. Birmingham (UK): Health Services Management Centre Faculty of Commerce and Social Science University of Birmingham; 1992.
5. Sinclair JC, Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Horwood SP, Saigal S, Sackett DL. Evaluation of neonatal-Intensive-Care Programs. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:489-94.
6. Richardson D, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Lee SK. Risk adjustment for quality improvement. Pediatrics. 1999;103:255-65.
7. Richardson DK, Gray JE, Gortmaker SL, Goldmann DA, Pursley DM, McCormick M. Declining severity adjust mortality: evidence of improving neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics. 1998;102:893-9.
8. Banta DH. Tecnologia para a Saúde. Cad Cienc Tec. 1991;7:8-16.
9. Horbar JD. The Vermont Oxford Network: evidence-based quality improvement for neonatology. Pediatrics. 1999;103(1 Suppl E):350-9.
10. Donabedian A. Criteria, norms and standards of quality: what do they mean? Am J Public Health. 1981;71:409-12.
11. Gray JE, Richardson DK, McCormick MC, Workman-Daniels K, Goldmann DA. Neonatal therapeutic intervention scoring system: a therapy-based severity-of-illness index. Pediatrics. 1992;90:561-7.
12. Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJ, Lee SK. SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: Simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores. J Pediatr. 2001;138:92-100.
13. Statistic Package for Social Science (SPSS) for Windows 1999.
14. Rogowski J. Using economic information in a quality improvement collaborative. Pediatrics. 2003;111:e411-8.
15. Lee SK, McMillan DD, Ohlsson A, Pendray M, Synnes A, Whyte R, et al. Variations in practices and outcomes in the Canadian NICU network: 1996-1997. Pediatrics. 2000;106:1070-9.
16. Gagliardi L, Cavazza A, Brunelli A, Battaglioli M, Merazzi D, Tandoi F, et al. Assessing mortality risk in very low birthweight infants: a comparison of CRIB, CRIB-II, and SNAPPE-II. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004;89:F419-22.
17. Zardo MS, Procianoy MS. Comparison between different mortality risk scores in a neonatal intensive care unit. Rev Saude Publica. 2003;37:591-6.
18. Georgieff MK, Mills MM, Bhatt P. Validation of two scoring systems which assess the degree of physiology instability in critically ill newborn infants. Crit Care Med. 1989;17:17-21.
19. Matijasevich A, Barros FC, Rossello JLD. Atención de la salud en niños de muy bajo peso al nacer en Montevideo, Uruguay: comparación entre los sectores público y privado. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2001;77:313-20.