First breech twin pregnancy: Can we still accept a vaginal delivery? Comparative study of perinatal outcome with attempt of vaginal delivery versus planned cesarean: 166 Cases;Grossesse gémellaire et siège premier à terme: Peut-on encore accepter un accouchement par les voies naturelles? Comparaison rétrospective de l'issue périnatale selon la décision du mode d'accouchement sur 166 accouchements

Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 584-593

  Bats, A S ^a   Marie, V ^a   Sentilhes, L ^b   Cabrol, D ^a   Goffinet, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b HÔPITAL CHARLES NICOLLE   (France)

Author keywords

First breech twin; Maternal morbidity; Neonatal morbidity; Route of delivery; Twin pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITERION VARIABLE; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; LABOR ONSET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MOTHER FETUS RELATIONSHIP; NATURAL CHILDBIRTH; NEWBORN; NEWBORN DEATH; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; PERINATAL PERIOD; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; TWIN PREGNANCY; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 33749517048     PISSN: 03682315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0368-2315(06)76448-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Enquête nationale périnatale 2003, http://www.sante.gouv.fr/ htm/dossiers/perinat03/.Paris, 2005.
2. Chervenak FA, Johnson RE, Youcha S, Hobbins JC, Berkowitz RL. Intrapartum management of twin gestation. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 65: 119-24.
3. Pons JC, Hoffmann P. La césarienne a-t-elle une indication en cas de grossesse gémellaire ? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2000 ; 29 (suppl. 2): 40-50.
4. Hofmeyr GJ, Drakeley AJ. Delivery of twins. Baillière's Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 12: 91-108.
5. Barrett JFR, Ritchie WK. Twin delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 16: 43-56.
6. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR, for the Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation term: a randomized multicenter trial. The Lancet 2000; 356: 1375-83.
7. Spinillo A, Stronati M, Ometto A, Fazzi E, de Seta F, Iasci A. The influence of presentation ad method of delivery on neonatal mortality and infant neurodevelopmental outcome in nondiscordant low-birth weight (<2500 g) twin gestation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1992; 47: 189-94.
8. Bartnicki J, Meyenburg M, Sailing E. The interval in twin delivery: the second twin need not always be born shortly after the first. Gynaecol Obstet Investig 1992: 19-20.
9. Zhang J, Bowes WA, Grey TW, Mc Mahon MJ. Twin delivery and neonatal and infant mortality: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 593-8.
10. Hogle KL, Hutton EK, McBrien KA, Barrett JF, Hannah ME. Cesarean delivery for twins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 220-7.
11. Carbonne B, Langer B, Goffinet F, Audibert F, Tardif D, Le Goueff F et al. Multicenterstudy on the clinical value of fetal pulse oximetry. II. Compared predictive values of pulse oximetry and fetal blood analysis. The French Study Group on Fetal Pulse Oximetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 593-8.
12. Carayol M, Alexander S, Goffinet F, Breart G, Alexander S, Uzan S, et al. Mode d'accouchement des femmes avec une présentation du siège à terme dans l'étude PREMODA (PRE-sentation et MODe d'Accouchement). J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2004 ; 33 (1 Suppl) : S37-44.
13. Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, et al. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 864-71.
14. Linasmita V, Prasertsawat PO, Sirimongkolkasem R. Twin pregnancy: intrapartum management of twins presenting other than vertex-vertex. J Med Assoc Thailand 1986; 69: 263-272.
15. Motew M, Ginsberg NA. Clinical management of monoamniotic twins. In: Keith LG, Papiernik E, Keith DM, Luke B, ed. Multiple pregnancy: Epidemiology, gestation, and perinatal outcome. New York: Parthenon publishing, 1995:527-534.
16. Pons JC, Papiernik E. Les grossesses multiples. In: Papiernik E, Cabrol D, Pons JC. Obstétrique. Médecine-Sciences Flammarion, 1995, p. 585-604.
17. Cabrol D, Goffinet F. Présentation du siège. In: Cabrol D, Goffinet F. Protocoles cliniques en obstétrique, Masson Eds, Paris, 2003, p. 163-166.
18. Persad VL, Baskett TF, O'Connell CM, Scott HM. Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98: 1032-7.
19. Cheung YB, Yip P, Karlberg J. Mortality of twins and single-tons by gestational age: a varying-coefficient approach. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152: 1107-16.
20. Grisaru D, Fuchs S, Kupferminc MJ, Har-Toov J, Niv J, Lessing JB. Outcome of 306 twin deliveries according to first twin presentation and method of delivery. Am J Perinatol 2000; 17: 303-7.
21. Blickstein I, Goldman RD, Kupferminc M. Delivery of breech first twins: a multicenter retrospective study. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 37-42.
22. Oettinger M, Ophir E, Markovitz J, Stolero E, Odeh M. Is caesarean section necessary for delivery of a breech first twin? Gynecol Obstet Invest 1993; 35: 38-43.
23. Essel JK, Opai-Tetteh ET. Is routine caesarean section necessary for breech-breech and breech-transverse twin gestations? S AfrMed J 1996; 86: 1196-2000.
24. Subtil D, Vaast P, Dufour P, Depret-Mosser S, Codaccioni X, Puech F. Conséquences maternelles de la césarienne par rapport à la voie basse. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2000 ; 29 (suppl.2) : 10-6.
25. Wells SR, Thorp JM Jr, Bowes WA Jr. Management of the nonvertex second twin. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991 ; 172: 383-5.