The paradox of administrative control in fostering teacher professional development

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1104-1117

  Sandholtz, Judith Haymore ^a   Scribner, Samantha Paredes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Administrative control; Professional development; Reform; Standards; Teacher learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749515764     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ball D.L., and Cohen D.K. Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In: Darling Hammond L., and Sykes G. (Eds). Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (1999), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 127-150
2. Bryk A., Camburn E., and Louis K.S. Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly 35 (1999) 751-781
3. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved from 〈http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1〉.
4. Darling-Hammond L., and McLaughlin M.W. Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan 76 8 (1995) 597-605
5. Fullan M. The new meaning of educational change (1991), Teachers College Press, New York
6. Fullan M. The limits and the potential of professional development. In: Guskey T.R., and Huberman M. (Eds). Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (1995), Teachers College Press, New York
7. Goldenberg C., and Gallimore R. Changing teaching takes more than a one-shot workshop. Educational Leadership 49 3 (1991) 69-72
8. Hawley W.D., and Rosenholtz S. Good schools: What research says about improving student achievement. Peabody Journal of Education 61 4 (1985) 1-178
9. Hawley W.D., and Valli L. The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In: Darling Hammond L., and Sykes G. (Eds). Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (1999), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco 127-150
10. Lee V., and Smith J. Collective responsibility for learning its effects on gains in achievement for early secondary school students. American Journal of Education 104 (1996) 103-147
11. Lieberman A. Practices that support teacher development: Transforming conceptions of professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan 76 8 (1995) 591-596
12. Lieberman A., and Miller L. Teacher development in professional practice schools. Teachers College Record 92 1 (1990) 105-122
13. Little J.W. Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15 2 (1993) 129-151
14. Loucks-Horsely S., Hewson P.W., Love N., and Stiles K.E. Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (1998), Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA
15. Louis K.S., and Marks H.M. Does professional community affect the classroom? Teachers' work and students' experiences in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education 106 (1998) 532-575
16. McLaughlin M.W. Test-based accountability as a reform strategy. Phi Delta Kappan 73 3 (1991) 248-251
17. McNeil L.M. Contradictions of control, Part 3: Contradictions of reform. Phi Delta Kappan 69 7 (1988) 478-485
18. McNeil L.M. Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing (2000), Routledge, New York
19. Miller E. The old model of staff development survives in a world where everything else has changed. In: Tovey R. (Ed). Professional Development, Harvard Education Letter Focus Series No.4 (1998), Harvard Education Letter, Cambridge
20. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. What matters most: Teaching for America's future (1996), Author, New York
21. Richardson V., and Placier P. Teacher change. In: Richardson V. (Ed). Fourth handbook of research on teaching (2001), American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C. 905-947
22. Sandholtz J.H., Ogawa R., and Scribner S. Standards gaps: Unintended consequences of standards-based reform. Teachers College Record 106 6 (2004) 1177-1202
23. Scribner J.P. Professional development: Untangling the influence of work context on teacher learning. Educational Administration Quarterly 38 (1999) 238-266
24. Shimahara N.K. The Japanese model of professional development: Teaching as craft. Teaching and Teacher Education 14 1 (1998) 33-52
25. Smylie M.A. Teacher learning in the workplace: Implications for school reform. In: Guskey T.R., and Huberman M. (Eds). Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (1995), Teachers College Press, New York
26. Smylie M.A., and Conyers J.G. Changing conceptions of teaching influence the future of staff development. Journal of Staff Development 12 1 (1991) 12-16
27. Sykes G. Reform of and as professional development. Phi Delta Kappan 77 7 (1996) 465-467
28. Yin R.K. Case study research: Design and methods. 2nd ed. (1994), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA