Participatory tools for coastal zone management: Use of stakeholder analysis and social mapping in Australia

Journal of Coastal Conservation

Volumn 10, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 81-92

  Rockloff, Susan F ^a   Lockie, Stewart ^a  

^a CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Environmental conflict; Great Barrier Reef; Planning; Queensland; Social analysis; Socio cultural

Indexed keywords

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; CORAL SEA; GREAT BARRIER REEF; PACIFIC OCEAN; QUEENSLAND;

EID: 33749511910     PISSN: 14000350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1652/1400-0350(2004)010[0081:PTFCZM]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bingham, G. 1986. Resolving environmental disputes: a decade of experience. The Conservation Foundation, Washington DC, US.
2. Cicin-Sain, B. & Knecht, R. W. 1998. Integrated coastal and ocean management: concepts and practices. Island Press, Washington, DC, US.
3. Dale, A.P. & Lane, M.B. 1994. Strategic perspectives analysis: A procedure for participatory and political social impact assessment. Soc. Nat. Resour. 7: 253-267.
4. De Lopes, T.T. 2001. Stakeholder management for conservation projects: A case study of Ream National Park, Cambodia. Environ. Manage. 28: 49-60.
5. Dryzek, J. 1990. Discursive democracy. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US.
6. Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st century business. Capstone, Oxford, UK.
7. Heard, C. 2002. The good oil. Insight, 16/05/2002, Available: http://www.sbs.com.au (Accessed 27 May. 2002).
8. Jennings, S.F. & Lockie, S. 2002. Democratisation and capacity building in coastal zone decision-making in Australia: the application of stakeholder analysis and social mapping. Paper presented at the Coastal Zone Asia Pacific Conference, Bangkok, TH.
9. Jennings, S.F. & Moore, S.A. 2000. The rhetoric behind regionalization in Australian natural resource management: myth, reality and moving forward. J. Environ. Policy Plann. 2: 177-191.
10. Lockie, S. 2001. Social Impact Assessment in Review: Setting the Agenda for Impact Assessment in the Twenty-First Century. Impact Assess. Project Appr. 19: 277-287.
11. Lockie, S. & Jennings, S. F. 2002. Central Queensland healthy waterways survey. Cooperative Research Centre for Coastal Zone, Estuary and Waterway Management, Brisbane.
12. McCreary, S., Gamman, J., Brooks, B., Whitman, L., Bryson, R., Fuller, B., McInerny, A. & Glaser, R. 2001. Applying a mediated negotiation framework to integrated coastal zone management. Coastal Manage. 29: 183-216.
13. McGlashan, D.J. & Williams, E. 2003. Stakeholder involvement in coastal decision-making processes. Local Environ. 8: 85-94.
14. Mitchell, B. & Hollick, M. 1993. Integrated catchment management in Western Australia: The transition from concept to implementation. Environ. Manage. 17: 735-743.
15. Ramanathan, R. 2001. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 63: 27-35.
16. Reeve, I. 2001. Property rights and natural resource management: tiptoeing round the slumbering dragon. In: Lockie, S. & Bourke, L. (eds.) Rurality bites: the social and environmental transformation of rural Australia, pp. 257-269. Pluto Press, Sydney, AU.
17. Stolp, A. 1999. Citizen values profiling: an impact assessment tool to investigate citizens' judgements. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of International Association for Impact Assessment, 15-19 June 1999, Glasgow, UK.
18. Wescott, G. 2002. Integrated natural resource management in Australia: the opportunity offered by a National Coastal Policy. Aust. J. Environ. Manage. 9: 138-140.
19. Westmacott, G. 1998. Reforming coastal management to improve community participation and integration in Victoria, Australia. Coastal Manage. 26: 3-15.